An
asterisk (*) indicates that the book was one of my dad’s.
Servants
-- Lucy Lethbridge
A
well-written history of domestic service in England over the mid-1800s to the
1970s. Modernization came late to England because house-owners didn't want to
go to the expense and inconvenience of getting things like washing machines or
electric irons just to make things easier for the servants. Many great English
houses didn't even have electricity until they were occupied by the Army during
World War II. Of course the upper class painted this as a moral issue: if the
servants' work got easier they'd just use their spare time to laze around. They
used the same argument against the National Health -- the employers protested
volubly that the relation between master and servant was an age-old noble
tradition and the Government interfering in it would destroy the fabric of
society (this despite the fact that it was very rare for employers to make any
kind of retirement provisions even for servants who'd worked for them for
decades.) As usual, social change had to wait for people to die: as both the
employers who demanded Victorian service and the number of people willing to
provide it died off, domestic service heavily declined in England. It wasn't
until the 1970s (!) that the majority of households had no servants. Really
interesting.
Take
This Bread -- Sara Miles
A
memoir; the first few chapters are the author's conversion story, pretty banal
and self-congratulatory, with a good deal of sneering over how shallow and
robotic other Christians are compared to her own hippy-dippy nonsectarian
congregation. Had that been all the book wouldn't be worth reading, but the
majority of it is taken up with an account of the food pantry she started in
San Francisco, operating weekly out of her church to provide groceries to
people who needed them. It's a good picture of the logistics of a volunteer
charity, and also a depressing reminder of how enormous the problem is, and how
any charitable volunteer eventually has to confront the fact that they will
never be able to feed everyone. That part of the book was really interesting.
Marathon
-- Richard A. Billows
A
gripping re-creation of the great battle of Marathon, with some good material
on its background and consequences but mainly concentrating on the course of
the battle itself. Billows makes a convincing case that the Athenians, whose
fighting style relied on hitting the enemy as a more or less concentrated mass,
probably didn't charge at full speed all the way from their encampment to the
Persian lines. Granted it was downhill all the way, but it's unlikely they
could have kept a unified front while running more than a mile over uneven
ground. Billows argues that they probably marched downhill at a walking pace in
order to stay together, only breaking into a run when they came into range of
the Persian arrows (two hundred yards or so.) It always surprises me that
pretty much all historians agree that Herodotos's account of only a few dozen
Athenian casualties versus thousands of Persian dead is probably accurate.
Alone
among the Greeks, the Plataeans stood with Athens at Marathon, sending their
whole army, and the Athenians never forgot it. When Plataea was later invaded
by the Persians, Athens took in the entire population and voted to make them
Athenian citizens, the only outsiders ever given that status.
Even
more interesting is the way the legend of Marathon has survived. Everyone
remembers that the herald Pheidippides ran the 26 miles from the beach at
Marathon to the Acropolis with news of the victory before dropping dead, but in
fact this didn't happen -- it's a conflation of two other things that did
happen, both of which are way more impressive! On the one hand, Pheidippides
did make an epic run, but it wasn't after the battle, it was before it.
Pheidippides was sent to Sparta to warn them of the Persian approach and ask
for help; he ran the hundred and forty miles from Athens to Sparta, crossing
two very difficult mountain passes, in only forty-eight hours -- and when the
Spartans said they wouldn't come until after the change of the moon, he slept
the night there and then ran all the way back with the bad news! On the other
hand, even more amazingly, although the Persians were badly beaten at Marathon,
they weren't destroyed, and their ships withdrew and set off southward,
intending to round the Euboean peninsula and attack Athens from the west. Since
the entire Athenian adult population was at Marathon, that meant the city was
defenseless -- so the whole Athenian army, after winning the battle,
immediately had to turn around and run the twenty-six miles back to Athens, in
their armor and carrying their weapons, cutting across the peninsula to beat
the Persians there. They made it with a couple hours to spare, and when the
Persian ships came in view of Athens and saw the army waiting for them, they
gave it up and went home. An excellent book.
So
You've Been Publicly Shamed -- Jon Ronson
A
book mostly about how the pile-on culture of the Internet has effectively
brought back the pillory. He opens with a vignette about a problem he had with
a trio of annoying college students who put his name on a Twitter account and
used it to publish inane garbage, and he found how easy it was to harness the
Internet's outrage machine to force them to stop -- literally thousands of
people, who didn't know any of the parties involved, gleefully piled on the
trio with harassing calls, emails, DDoS attacks, and the like until they had to
take the account down. Ronson thinks people join in this sort of thing so
eagerly for the same reasons they join lynch mobs: it provides an easy,
consequence-free rush of self-righteousness. He goes on to deal with the
stories of several other people who had the weight of the Internet fall on them
for various reasons major and minor -- a guy the author caught in plagiarism,
that dentist who shot the endangered lion, a couple people who made tasteless
jokes on Twitter -- and what happened to them afterwards. Most of them still
seemed genuinely shocked even months later, not only having lost their jobs and
careers but having to cope with ongoing harassment from thousands of strangers
with no reason to think it would ever stop. The case that struck me the most
was that of a British politician who was attacked in the newspapers, with
pictures, for his non-standard sexual practices. He seemed to suffer no
consequences whatever, not even losing his next election, which Ronson
attributes to the fact that he refused to defend himself or make any apology.
You can't be shamed if you won't be embarrassed. I thought that was
interesting. It was a good book.
Dear
American Airlines -- Jonathan Miles
A
polemic novel that takes the form of an angry letter written by the
protagonist, who is stuck at O'Hare because of an airline delay and in danger
of missing the wedding of his daughter, whom he hasn't seen since she was a
baby. He keeps adding to the letter as the delay gets longer and longer and he
has to keep going through security over and over when he goes outside to smoke,
and the letter eventually spreads out to cover his upbringing and tell the
story of his unsuccessful marriage and alienation from his ex-wife, the strain
of taking care of his mentally ill and now physically disabled mother, and his
urges toward suicide. This is all gotten across between some very funny asides,
which was necessary because the story itself is pretty heavy. I liked it.
The
White Feather -- P.G. Wodehouse
A
very early novel, set at the public school of Wrykyn (Wodehouse's disguised
version of his own school) telling the story of a bookish student who, ashamed of
not having jumped in when a fight broke out between the school boys and the
townies, spends the semester secretly training with a retired boxer in order to
enter the end-of-term contests and redeem himself. Even Wodehouse couldn't make
that plot seem fresh and the story is a little tedious. Well-written, though.
*Deathblow
Hill -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo mystery, not very good as a mystery (her books generally aren't) but
a great picture of Cape Cod in the mid-30s. Dad was very pleased with the
accuracy of the rural scenes -- such as a woman, upon hearing thunder, rushing
out to bring in the milk (after milking her cow she'd left the milk outside to
separate, and she had to go get it so the pail wouldn't get rained in.) He also
notes the way Asey's Cape relatives quote Scripture quite un-self-consciously
("Well, if thine enemy hunger, feed 'im, Asey") and someone remarking
"Here we be" (which he remembered Uncle George often saying.) My
favorite line was when Asey says of a long-standing enmity between two families
that it's "Not a good Southern feud -- more a passionately restrained
Eugene O'Neill sort." The mystery is resolved rather stupidly when it
turns out one of the characters has been insane all along, but you don't read
these books for the plot.
Radio
On -- Sarah Vowell
Her
first book, a diary of what was on the radio throughout 1995, alternating
mostly between the stations in Chicago and Bozeman, Montana. She was in her
early twenties and it shows. The prose is over-written and dull, and the book
has only commonplace things to say: Rush Limbaugh and Gordon Liddy are
mean-spirited and dishonest, NPR is self-admiring and unadventurous, top forty
pop music is shallow and usually boring. It wasn't very interesting.
Haruki
Murakami Goes to Meet Hayao Kawai -- Haruki Murakami
A
record of some conversations Murakami had with Kawai, a psychologist better
known in Japan than the US. I found it uninteresting. Murakami tried to start
general topics and Kawai always led them back to his ideas about therapy. A lot
of it has slipped my mind already and what I do remember was dull.
Heartbreak
House -- George Bernard Shaw
A
farcical comedy set in the teens, reading rather like a parody of Chekhov. The
action takes place at the Shotover house, an English country house built in the
shape of a sailing ship for some reason. Shotover is a mad inventor whose
function is to go in and out making crazy speeches and fail to recognize his
children; in between those scenes, the house guests take turns seeing who can
be more totally unmoved by other guests declaring their secret love. There's a
funny scene when the family catches a burglar, but are too softhearted to turn
him in, and they tell him he can go, but he refuses to leave unless they pay
him to -- he's not really a burglar at all, but an aggressive panhandler who
preys on English people's reluctance to make a scene. Shotover's laboratory is
blown up by an air raid, but no one seems to care very much and they all return
to being bored by life. I didn't find it very interesting.
*Coleridge's
Writings on Shakespeare -- Terence Hawkes, ed.
My
main takeaway from this was that Coleridge was really, really insistent that he
started paying serious attention to Shakespeare all on his own and absolutely
not because he went to lectures on Shakespeare by Friedrich Schiller in
Germany, that had nothing to do with it. In my memory he spends more time
insisting that his interpretation of Shakespeare is utterly uninfluenced by
Schiller than he does actually interpreting Shakespeare. This may be because
the book is a collection of public lectures he gave, reconstructed from
shorthand notes taken by newspaper stenographers in the audience. Coleridge is
supposed to have been a pretty good lecturer, but that doesn't come across in
these transcripts and I found them kind of dry.
One
of Ours -- Willa Cather
A
war novel, sort of, although most of it takes place in Nebraska around the turn
of the last century. The hero, Claude, is a farmer's son who feels hopelessly
locked in to a life of unfulfilling drudgery on the prairie; his father could
afford to send him to college, but won't do it because he considers it
unnecessary. Looking for some independence, Claude marries and sets up on his
own farmstead; but his wife is only interested in promoting missionary work --
it's strongly implied that the marriage is never consummated -- and Claude
feels more isolated and hopeless than ever, so much so that when the US enters
the war in Europe in 1917, Claude can't volunteer fast enough. He mentally
infuses the war with his romantic ideas about purpose, and for the first time
in his life he feels like what he's doing matters. He ends up getting killed in
a German offensive, which, I'm pretty sure, is what he was hoping for. It was a
good book.
Black
Folk Tales -- Julius Lester
A
collection of retold slave stories from the 19th century. Most of them tell the
adventures of High John the Conqueror, a trickster figure probably derived from
Anansi, and probably also the inspiration for Br'er Rabbit. High John is an
African prince sold into American slavery, and he outwits the whites by
exploiting their laziness, greed, and arrogance. Good reading.
*Portrait
of Dr. Gachet -- Cynthia Saltzman
A
good book about one specific painting, Van Gogh's brilliant portrait of the
doctor who was treating him during the last months of his life. Van Gogh seems
to have taken a dislike to the doctor at first but soon warmed up to him; his
private letters describe the doctor as "sensitive and intelligent".
The first part of the book deals with the background and composition of the
portrait: Dr. Gachet is shown in the classic pose of melancholy, his elbow on a
table and his chin resting heavily on his right hand. Van Gogh said he meant
the doctor's face to represent "the heartbroken expression of our time".
Van Gogh killed himself less than a month after finishing it, and along with
the rest of his property it went to his brother and sister. The rest of the
book follows the painting as it was sold and re-sold until it went for $82
million at an auction in 1990, making it the most expensive painting in history
at the time the book was written. For the early part of the 20th century it was
in a museum in Frankfurt; the curator took it down in the thirties and hid it
in a storeroom in hopes of protecting it from the Nazis' campaign to clean
Germany of "degenerate" art. It didn't work, though, and the portrait
was confiscated in 1937. It might have been burned, as many other paintings
were, but Goering requisitioned it and sold it; a Jewish banker named Karmarsky
got hold of it through a middleman and sent it out of Europe to the United
States, where it hung in the Met in New York for a long time until Kramarsky's
descendants had Christie's auction it off. A crazy Japanese gazillionaire
bought it and promptly shut it away in his house, and it's never been seen in
public since, although the buyer died over twenty years ago. Good reading.
Devil
in a Blue Dress -- Walter Mosley
His
first novel, a noir story introducing Ezekiel ("Easy") Rawlins, a
black Army veteran living in LA just after the war. As the novel begins he's
just been let go from his factory job for being "uppity", and at
loose ends (and with a mortgage to meet) he takes a kind of shady
friend-of-a-friend job looking for a black woman who's lying low while several
white men are on her trail, for reasons no one wants to tell Rawlins. He
figures it out as the plot unfolds, dealing with 1940s race politics, theft,
murder, and obsession. I liked the internal struggle he goes through when
debating whether to call for help from a childhood friend of his, a stone-cold
killer incongruously named Mouse. Rawlins knows that Mouse's solution to every
problem is just to kill everyone involved, and he has to decide between the
weight that involving Mouse will put on his own conscience against the bad
consequences of failing to resolve the case. I liked it a lot.
The
Coming of Bill -- P.G. Wodehouse
I
didn't like this. I thought both the hero and the love interest were awful, and
it was all the worse because Wodehouse obviously expects you to admire their
awful behavior. The hero is a semi-talented painter with a trust fund living a
Bohemian life in New York. When he falls for a woman and gets married she
drives off all his former friends; it's explicitly stated that she does this
because she's jealous of them and can't stand for there to be anyone who shares
a part of his life that she wasn't there for. This is held up as something to
be praised. They live a life of near-total isolation, seeing and speaking to no
one but each other and their infant son Bill, for a year or two until the
hero's trust fund collapses. He joins a mining expedition to Central America to
make a fortune, and comes back to New York two years later having failed at it.
When he returns he finds that his wife has inherited money and they're now
rich. He's furious that his wife has made friends and now has a life outside of
the house instead of sitting quietly at home (again Wodehouse presents this as
an attitude we're supposed to sympathize with) and eventually leaves her
because of it. In the end she comes crawling to him and renounces her
independence, and they settle down to live in monastic solitude. Wodehouse
clearly thinks this is a happy ending, but I think the whole book is really a
horror story.
Pedagogy
of the Oppressed -- Paulo Freire
An
interesting book about educating the proletariat while maintaining solidarity
-- that is, not being condescending or trying to dictate the people's direction
for them. The book is concerned with educating illiterate adults rather than
with child-based teaching. It does rather stumble on the blind spot of Marxist
theorists, the assumption that whatever the mass of the people decide on is by
definition morally right. If you held a plebiscite in America to determine
whether or not to outlaw every non-Christian religion, I'm sure the result
would be yes.
*The
Tinkling Symbol -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
The
first of the Asey Mayo books Dad read; apparently Mom saw Taylor's obituary in
the Globe and showed it to Dad, who went to the library to see what they had.
That was in 1976 so it would have still been the old library in the Memorial
building. It's a murder mystery, narrated by yet another middle-aged New
England spinster, who can place people within ten miles or so from their
accents; Dad notes this was quite possible back before television. I was
interested in how the subtext changes what people meant -- for example, when
Asey says a man wasn't good enough at football to get a job after college, he's
not talking about playing in pro football, he means that if the man had been a
bigger star at his Ivy League school, some alumnus would have given him a minor
Wall Street sinecure because of it. (Dad notes this was still true well into
the fifties.) Also when someone says of a woman that she's well-known for her
personal generosity, I might not have realized that that was a roundabout way
of calling her promiscuous. The mystery itself is silly, as usual, with Taylor
obviously not deciding who the killer is until the last minute and then pulling
a motive out of thin air.
The
Hidden Life of Trees -- Peter Wohlleben
I
learned a lot of cool stuff about trees from this -- I hadn't known, for
example, that fallen trees soak up the spring rains and act as reservoirs for
the forest life throughout the summer; or that a forest's root structure is
immensely more interconnected than I'd thought, so much so that a tree in a
forest and the same tree standing in the open by itself would practically be
different organisms; or that on average trees live at replacement level -- that
is, out of all the seeds a tree produces over its lifetime, typically one will
become a full-grown tree. On the other hand the writer seems to be asserting
(although not a hundred percent seriously, since he must know it's ridiculous)
that trees are intelligent and capable of emotions. He absurdly romanticizes
wholly mechanical actions. For example, when a tree falls, the stump often
stays alive for several years, because its roots are still connected to the
surrounding trees, and the interchange of nutrients goes on for quite a while
until the stump degenerates enough that its tissues are no longer capable of
supporting moisture. Because trees that fall are generally older trees, the
surrounding trees will usually have sprung from seeds dropped by the fallen
tree. The author, with a straight face, says that this shows that the trees
keep the stump alive on purpose out of filial affection. That detracted from
the book for me, but it was still interesting.
Justinian's
Flea -- William Rosen
Outstanding
book about the terrible pandemic that struck the Roman Empire in AD 540-542,
the first known outbreak of the Black Death. It was caused by a now-extinct
strain of the plague virus, apparently a mutation generated in rat-borne fleas
carried on grain ships across the Mediterranean. Anywhere from thirty to fifty million
people died, about twenty-five percent of the empire, including nearly half the
population of Constantinople itself. This outbreak carried not only the
fearsome buboes but a fast-spreading necrosis: people's hands rotted right off
their arms before they died. The fact that the empire, in however changed form,
was able to survive such an enormous blow is a testament to the staggering
power, wealth, and organization of the Roman state. Rome was always more a
product of mass power than individual will, and there were many emperors who
had almost no effect on the operation or legacy of the empire, but you couldn't
say that about Justinian. A man of tremendous energy and intelligence, he
governed the world with the help of immensely competent assistants; the honest
ones he sent to solve distant problems, the treacherous ones he kept helplessly
under his thumb. Unlike many monarchs, who schemed or fought for the purple
with no real motive beyond wanting to be top dog, Justinian had a very clear
and wide-horizoned vision of what he wanted the empire to do and become. Along
with securing the borders, crushing dissent, and reforming the laws, he set out
to reconquer Italy and its possessions, lost to the Empire a hundred years
previously, at least as much out of vainglory as policy. He was the last
emperor to rule both the western and eastern halves of the empire and is
sometimes called "the last Roman". The codex of laws he produced was
probably his most lasting influence. It was said of Augustus that he found Rome
in brick and left it in marble; it might be said of Justinian that he found
Rome a tribal monarchy and left it a theocratic nation-state. The plague hit at
the very height of his success; Justinian himself sickened from it, but
recovered. He seems to have recognized almost right away that the appalling
loss of manpower and resources meant that he would have to abandon some of his
ambitions and Rome would have to contract its sphere of influence, and to his
credit he got right to it without much delay. The book raises a lot of
what-ifs. Muhammad was born only twenty years after the plague; what if
emerging Islam had faced a Rome that hadn't had to withdraw from the Middle
East? What if a heavily weakened Rome hadn't had to grant local autonomy to
powerful Slavic and Germanic tribes? All of Eurasia might have ended up divided
between a unified Rome in the west and a unified China in the east, with
Zoroastrian Persia as a buffer state in the middle and Islam a forgotten
footnote. Very good reading.
Dynasty
-- Tom Holland
I
liked this, but I did get the feeling that the original manuscript must have
been a bit sticky when Holland handed it in. It's a blood-and-sex history of
the Julio-Claudian dynasty, from Caesar to Nero, and Holland clearly decided
that the best way to get an exciting punch-'em-in-the-face story was not only
to accept every single thing people's enemies wrote about them at face value,
but to add lurid descriptions that he probably thinks "give an educated
idea of what might have happened" (read: he made them up.) I particularly
thought he was overly interested in what specifically Tiberius was doing during
his retirement on Capri. The Forum gossip held that Tiberius was secretly a
predator of demonic sexual energy and that Capri was filled with nonstop orgies
of indescribable depravity; Holland cheerfully assumes this is perfectly true
and outdoes the sources in speculating exactly what the orgies might have been
like. (I myself think that Tiberius probably spent his time on Capri quietly
reading, and I have better reason, since that's what he's known to have done
with his free time elsewhere.)
This
makes me not take the book seriously, since once you've accepted an assumption
as true it affects all your subsequent reasoning. For example, take these three
known facts about Caligula: for the first year of his reign he was widely
praised as a temperate, reasonable person who took his duties seriously and
made a large number of excellent policy decisions that everyone approved of.
Then he got so sick he almost died. After that he was universally reviled as a
monster of cruelty and treated the Senate and Rome generally like dirt.
The
most reasonable explanation, most modern historians think (I agree, for what
that's worth) is that Caligula suffered some sort of brain damage from his
illness and became progressively more insane as time went on. Holland, though,
to fit his narrative, constructs a psychodrama where the young Caligula was so
scarred by witnessing the incredible sexual excesses at orgies in his youth
(here Holland digresses again to give a picture of what those orgies must have
been like, drawn unapologetically from his imagination) that his mind was
permanently twisted, and his good behavior in his first year on the throne is
explained away as Caligula slowly gathering the courage to behave as he wanted
to. It's a good story but it's bad history.
*Out
of My Later Years -- Albert Einstein
A
collection of magazine articles, mostly about peace and disarmament. I was
struck by one article that consisted of notes for a speech he'd prepared for a
gathering of German university professors (which never took place because the
Nazis ordered them all fired) in which he called for all the intellectual
leaders of the nation to stand up for science and freedom of thought, because
if they wouldn't defend them they didn't deserve to have them.
A
Pelican at Blandings -- P.G. Wodehouse
One
of his last books, a terrific farce wherein the peacefully solitary life at
Blandings is knocked askew by the arrival of a crowd of unwanted house guests,
all of whom consider themselves free to criticize and harass poor Lord
Emsworth: his snobbish sister Connie, an equally snobbish woman named Vanessa
(the first chance acquaintance made on a boat in all of Wodehouse who doesn't
turn out to be a con artist), and the awful bullyragging Duke of Dunstable, the
Donald Trump of his time, an obnoxious ass who considers the whole world his
doormat. Lord Emsworth calls for help from his loyal brother Gally, who arrives
to suavely insult and infuriate the houseguests, coolly reminding Dunstable
that he was rejected from Gally's Pelican Club as an undesirable. Dunstable
clings like a limpet, though: he's bought a valuable painting because he knows
the wealthy Wilbur Trout badly wants it, and he intends to squeeze a high price
out of Trout for it when he visits in his turn. (Wodehouse disliked greed, and
he once said of some rich man that although he was worth a million pounds he
would still walk eight miles in pinching shoes in order to cheat someone out of
sixpence.) However, Gally learns from his godson Johnny -- who is secretly
engaged to Dunstable's ward Linda, though they're on the outs just now because
Linda was a witness in a court case, and Johnny, who happened to be acting for
the defense, grilled her harshly on the stand -- that the painting is a fake,
and in order to save Johnny's friend the art dealer from exposure Gally steals
the fake, intending to replace it with the real one. Before he can, though,
Lord Emsworth, who has been down by the sty condoling with his prize pig, who
is ill and off her feed, finds himself locked out and has to get in the house
through Dunstable's window, causing a mass confusion that ends with Johnny
falling down the main staircase and taking Dunstable with him. Worth the price,
I'd say, and on top of that his accident brings Linda running to make things
up. To soothe Dunstable's temper, Connie gets him to write a letter proposing
marriage to the wealthy Vanessa, but when Wilbur Trout arrives to look at the
painting, we find that he and Vanessa are old flames; meanwhile, Gally, having
intercepted the letter of proposal, tells Dunstable that Vanessa is actually a
pauper, and uses the letter to blackmail him into allowing Linda to marry Johnny,
before he can find out that Gally made it up and in fact Trout and Vanessa have
run off together. All the infuriated guests blow out of Blandings in a rage and
Lord Emsworth is left alone to eat his meals peacefully in the library. It says
a lot about how neatly Wodehouse's crazy plots resolve themselves that I read
this book months ago and the plot is still clear in my mind. I loved it.
The
Sketch-Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent. -- Washington Irving
His
most famous book, a collection of stories and essays including "The Legend
of Sleepy Hollow" and "Rip Van Winkle". It was the first really
popular American book, widely read both in the US and in Europe. Most of the
essays actually deal with England, where he was living when he wrote it, and
English writers he admired, such as William Roscoe and Izaak Walton. There's a
good essay condemning the American government for its brutal treatment of the
American Indians. The prose is very good, very "easy" as Samuel
Johnson would say, and I enjoyed reading it.
Acres
of Skin -- Allen M. Hornblum
An
appalling book about medical experiments on black prisoners in Pennsylvania in
the fifties, sixties, and seventies. The man who ran the program was a
dermatologist named Kligman; he was originally called in to Holmesburg prison
to treat the chronic athlete's foot the prisoners were getting from poorly
cleaned shower floors. He later said of the prisoners that "all I saw was
acres of skin"; he realized right away that the prisoners would make ideal
test subjects because every aspect of their lives was tightly controlled. He
quickly got funding from Johnson & Johnson and recruited prisoners for
skin-cream experiments; the prisoners, desperate for money to pay their lawyers,
were told they were simply testing acne treatments, which in fact some of them
were. The author, entering Holmesburg for the first time around 1970, was
surprised to see shirtless prisoners with tic-tac-toe patterns taped on their
backs and others walking around with terrible scarring; what really got to him
was that none of the guards or prison administrators seemed to care at all. The
author eventually found out that Kligman was also funded by Dow Chemical and
he'd been experimenting on the prisoners using Agent Orange, psychoactive
drugs, and even radioactive material. Not only had Kligman not told the
prisoners what he was doing, he was just a dermatologist and not in any way
qualified to administer drugs or work with radiation, and he was also sloppy
and dishonest, discarding results he didn't like and falsely claiming
certifications he didn't possess. The FDA revoked his approval for a while when
this came to light but Johnson & Johnson leaned on Congress to force them
to restore it. Everything about this was awful, but I couldn't decide which was
the absolute worst. Was it that Kligman got very rich off the program? That so
many of the prisoners were left with permanently crippling conditions for which
they were never compensated? That Kligman never showed any remorse at all
(either about this or about his separate experiments on retarded children) and
went to his grave without apologizing? That when it all came to light the
op-eds in the newspapers regarded the whole thing as part of the prisoners'
debt to society, arguing that prisoners don't have human rights? It was a very
good book but very heavy going.
Sex,
Bombs, and Burgers -- Peter Nowak
A
book on the history of technology, basically about how pretty much every
technical gadget you use was originally designed for pornography or the
military or the fast food industry, and later repurposed for general
consumption. The microwave oven was invented by a defense contractor based on
radar technology he developed during the war; the early ovens were huge and
expensive, and it was only when McDonald's adopted them that they became
financially tenable. The Roomba self-propelled vacuum cleaner was originally a
mine-sweeper developed for searching caves in Afghanistan. And so on. It was
pretty good.
The
Tale of the Dueling Neurosurgeons -- Sam Kean
The
title led me to expect a conflict of personality between two specific people,
but that's not what the book is about. It's mostly a collection of case
histories of people with brain injuries and their odd results (the author
admits, with a weary sigh, that he just couldn't avoid including Phineas Gage,
even though his story has been told ad nauseam.) The connecting thread is the
pretty much wholly empirical development of neuroscience, for which the only
approach until very recently was just to find people with head injuries and
follow them around. The field eventually developed into two camps: those who
thought communication among the nerves in the brain used chemical secretions,
and those who thought it used electrical impulses. The two camps were generally
known as the "Soups" and the "Sparks", though surprisingly
without much of the vicious acrimony that usually accompanies academic
disagreements. I liked it.
*The
Crimson Patch -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo mystery set on the Cape in 1936. The effects of the Depression are
everywhere visible, though no one uses the word -- characters talk about losing
their pensions and everyone just knows what they mean. Also when someone causes
a disturbance to distract the heroes' attention, Asey grumbles "They
probably got some hobos to leave off pretending to dig alphabetical ditches for
the Government and come up here." Taylor believed you should never let the
plot get in the way of the setting; very visible here, as the plot involves a
naive Bostonian who gets on a budget bus to the Cape, not realizing the driver
is an escaping criminal who has murdered the real driver, and strains
credibility by accidentally switching bags with the driver and so walking off
with the loot. Taylor gives everyone an alibi so when she finally decides, a
few pages before the end, who the killer is, she has to undo his alibi, pretty
unconvincingly. Dad liked the scene where a character tries to get to sleep and
instead of counting sheep recites the Iliad and "Thanatopsis" to
himself. (Dad notes that Mom memorized part of "Thanatopsis" in
school, but when I asked her about it she said she didn't and had probably just
said that to show off.)
The
Undoing Project -- Michael Lewis
Michael
Lewis is a bit of a hero-worshipper, and I get the feeling that when he's not
writing about finance (a topic where his feet are firmly on his own ground) he
relies too much on what the subjects of his books tell him. This book is about
the economist Daniel Kahneman and his contentious intellectual partnership with
the cognitive scientist Amos Tversky; since Tversky died twenty years ago it's
necessarily told from Kahneman's point of view, and I think Lewis was overly
uncritical. He quotes Kahneman saying, about his own work (I'm paraphrasing)
"This is established fact, there's no possible disagreement" when
actually there's a lot of contemporary criticism of Kahneman's work,
particularly his over-reliance on insufficient sample sizes, none of which
Lewis mentions. There's a classic example of authorial blindness: Lewis
describes a lecture Kahneman and Tversky gave to an audience of historians, in
which they described points of important decisions in history, and argued that
modern historians don't have any information that the people involved didn't
have before the decision, so their only advantage is that they know how things
turned out, which doesn't actually tell you anything about the decision-making
process. Then Lewis quotes Kahneman beaming about how all the historians
staggered out of the room ashen-faced, having had their entire discipline
turned upside down, with no acknowledgement whatever that the whole story
relies on Kahneman's unsupported memory of something that happened forty years ago,
which is exactly the same error that Kahneman is warning about on the same
page! Lewis also did not find and speak to any historians who were at that
lecture, so he's really just taking Kahneman's word that he won a fight and the
other guy ran off crying. Kahneman and Tversky are best known for their
argument that long-term decisions shouldn't be made on the basis of short-term
peak or trough performances, since those performances are sure to regress to
the mean over time. As far as I can see the only people who have really
internalized that lesson are the people who run professional sports teams.
(It's why the Patriots didn't break the bank to re-sign LeGarrette Blount; Bill
Belichick knows that a guy who averages 4.5 rushing touchdowns a season over his
career, and then has 18 at age thirty, isn't going to do it again the next
season.) For all that, it was an interesting read.
*Happy
to Be Here -- Garrison Keillor
His
first book, a collection of several short stories and a few dozen vignettes. I
liked the ones about a detective who realizes his private-eye skills are
ideally suited to the field of arts administration; the rest I thought were
kind of hit or miss. Not bad though.
Nervous
Conditions -- Tsitsi Dangarembga
An
autobiographical novel, telling the story of a young girl named Tambu growing
up in Rhodesia during the UDI period. (The UDI, Unilateral Declaration of
Independence, was the fifteen-year period between Rhodesia separating from
Britain and Britain accepting it, ending with the creation of fully independent
Zimbabwe in 1980.) Tambu's family lives in rural semi-poverty, relieved by aid
from the head of their family; we never learn his name because Tambu thinks of
him only as Babamukuru, literally "father's older brother".
Babamukuru is a teacher and school administrator, and the novel dwells on his
(and Tambu's) obsession with European values: the whole family has converted to
Anglican Christianity, and Babamukuru has studied in England and is grooming
Tambu's older brother to follow in his footsteps, which makes him feel superior
to the others and refuse to do his share of the family chores. After the
brother dies at age twelve, Tambu is sent to the school to take his place; she
finds that her once easy relationship with her cousin Nyasha has become less
warm now that Nyasha has been to school in England and speaks English almost
exclusively, snobbishly affecting to have trouble understanding their native
Shona. Nyasha's time abroad has also made her less willing to conform to the
traditional life of a Shona woman as her father expects her to, and this leads
to angry arguments within the family. Tambu devotes her time to the fiercely
competitive schoolwork, with the aim of qualifying for higher education, and to
dealing with Nyasha's unhealthy eating disorder, which her father refuses to
acknowledge. It was a troubling book but I liked it.
The
Pot-Hunters -- P.G. Wodehouse
His
first novel, written when he was a teenager. It's a school-story, revolving
around a pair of silver sports trophies stolen from the school grounds, and the
difficulty of catching the thief (a local poacher) given the complexities of
who saw what when they were out after curfew, or off school grounds when they
weren't supposed to be, and that sort of thing. It isn't that great, but come
on, he wrote it when he was nineteen. The only part I really liked was the
scene where a teacher visits a local house where a student (for plot reasons)
is laid up with a sprained ankle; he intends to give the student a talking-to,
but the woman whose house it is guesses what he's there for and, knowing that
the teacher can't decently yell at a student with a local matron in the room,
sits cheerfully by the bedside, deaf to all hints about giving them some
privacy, until the teacher has to give in and leave. Other than that it was
pretty dull.
Tales
of St. Austin's -- P.G. Wodehouse
A
collection of mildly interesting short stories all set at an English boys'
school in the 1890s, generally about clever but lazy schoolboys who slack off
their work and play tricks on the school masters. Mostly written when Wodehouse
was in his teens, when he had some skill with prose but had not yet developed
his strengths of plot and character. I read it because I'm a completist, but it
didn't exactly enrich my life.
Mildred
Pierce -- James M. Cain
A
nasty novel from the thirties, very well written and tightly paced, but I
didn't like it because all the characters are so awful. The main character,
Mildred Pierce, is a housewife in the early days of the Great Depression; as
the story begins she kicks her worthless philandering husband out of the house
and sets out to find a job. After some trouble swallowing her pride, she ends
up as a waitress at a diner, which she at first tries to keep secret for fear
of offending her older daughter, a spoiled ten-year-old who has been raised to
despise the working-class and admire the idle rich. Mildred starts a side
business baking pies and eventually opens her own restaurant, but all her work
is always undermined by her desperate need to buy the love of her monstrous
daughter, who detests her. Eventually she loses everything and the story ends
with her clearly on the road to drinking herself to death. A miserably
depressing book.
Never
Look an American in the Eye -- Okey Ndibe
Ndibe
is a Nigerian writer who came to America in the late eighties to attend grad
school at UMass -- I must have met him in the English department there but I
don't remember it. There's a funny scene when he arrives in New York in
December, having flown from near-equatorial Nigeria without even a jacket; he
walks out of the airport terminal into his first winter wind, and immediately
turns around and walks right back in. His name is pronounced "okay",
which led to a lot of confusion in his early days at grad school. He also got
to work with the great writer Chinua Achebe; he tells the story of how when he
was young all the neighborhood boys would come running out to wave at Achebe's
car when it went by. With Achebe's encouragement, he founded a well-respected
magazine called African Commentary, which had a good reputation for a while
before folding for lack of money. (Ndibe expected Achebe to be more involved
with the magazine than he turned out to be, and this soured their relationship
a bit.) The title comes from the way his Nigerian relatives loaded him with
advice about going to America, although none of them had ever been there; his
uncle solemnly assured him that Americans would shoot you if you looked them in
the eye, so he spent his first few weeks in the US always looking at the
ground. I liked it.
The
Little Nugget -- P.G. Wodehouse
Not
one of his better books. The hero is Peter, a wealthy idler, who, after his
fiancée jilted him, became engaged to an impoverished woman named Cynthia,
mostly out of pity. Cynthia works for a very rich American, whose rotten
teenage son, Ogden, is the "nugget" of the title: so called because
of his value as a target for kidnappers. He has in fact been kidnapped several
times: sometimes by agents of his divorced parents stealing him back and forth
from each other, sometimes by professionals working on spec, as it were. The
father has sent Ogden to an English school, and against his better judgement
Peter lets Cynthia talk him into helping her kidnap Ogden on behalf of the
mother; he gets a job at the school as a classics teacher, but soon finds that
several other would-be kidnappers have also taken jobs there and they all
settle into a war of attrition. As it happens Peter's ex-fiancée also works
there, having been deserted by the guy she ran off with, and the two of them
end up barricaded in a stable and holding off a gang, until Ogden escapes
through the roof, having decided he'd rather be kidnapped than stay at the
school. Luckily Peter hears that Cynthia has dumped him so he can reunite with
his ex. The only part I thought was really funny was the math teacher who sells
insurance on the side, and whose gloomy conversation always dwells on sickness,
old age, and death.
The
American Senator -- Anthony Trollope
This
wasn't bad but I felt like Trollope couldn't decide which of the three story
lines was the main plot and which were the subplots. There are two romances,
intended to be foils to each other: one the story of Mary, the daughter of a
country lawyer who falls in love with a gentleman but says nothing because he's
of too high a social class for her; the other the story of Arabella, a
well-born but insolvent society woman who sets out in the most cynical way to
entrap a lord into marriage. Arabella's story is much more vivid and well-told,
but Arabella herself is repellent, a woman totally devoid of any feeling other
than hatred of herself and the wealthy men she unsuccessfully pursues;
everything she says or does is part of a calculated act and she lies
constantly. Mary is a much nicer but also less interesting character; her whole
story is loving the squire's brother in silence and refusing a marriage offer
from a farmer without telling anyone why, and suffering persecution from her
stepmother for it. Eventually she does marry the squire's brother, but only
because circumstances arrange it -- she never really does anything other than
sit in her room and cry. I thought she was tedious -- I can't imagine having a
conversation with her, for example. What could you talk about? To both of these
stories is added a third, the visit to England of the honest but tactless
Senator Gotobed, who is shown to be constitutionally incapable of understanding
English customs. Trollope probably meant to use the Senator to deliver some
mild social criticism, but he detested America and progressiveness in general
so the Senator comes across as an arrogant buffoon. The Senator becomes
interested in a local case where a landowner sues a local nobleman for damages
after the nobleman's fox-hunt wrecks his crops; this could have been a good
plot-thread, showing how the courts behave when a poor man sues a rich man, but
in Trollope anyone who opposes any aristocrat or any old custom is by
definition a villain, so of course the plaintiff is shown to be a worthless
thief who's only suing the lord because he's too lazy to work his land
properly. It could have been handled better.
Time
and Tide -- John Ruskin
A
series of public letters addressed to a friend in Manchester, on the subject of
the public unrest there at the time (in the mid-1800s, Manchester was the
second-largest city in England but it had no representatives in Parliament.)
It's a well-argued tract in favor of Ruskin's awful political views -- he was
very much against equality and individual liberty, and he describes his ideal
government as a sort of Confucian England, an unchanging hierarchy where every
man's life is under constant supervision by a political/religious official, who
is supervised in turn by an official still higher, and so on up to the House of
Lords. Everyone would spend all his life in the station to which he was born,
and all aspects of his work and domestic life would be laid out in rules, which
his supervisor would make sure he followed. Also every detail of his
professional and private lives would have to be written down in a state-ordered
journal that would be periodically published. Since Ruskin's picture of the
good life sounds to me like an appalling nightmare, it won't surprise you that
I thought all his other ideas were equally useless and repellent.
The
Real Inspector Hound -- Tom Stoppard
A
play from the sixties, a really, really funny dark comedy. I last read it in
college and it's even funnier the second time around. The main characters are
two theater critics watching a whodunit, a parody of Christie's The
Mouse-Trap. The whodunit is a disaster, with the actors missing cues,
coming on and off at the wrong times, and clearly ad-libbing to cover their
mistakes. The critics are only half interested in the play; the older critic is
more concerned with the affair he hopes to have with the lead actress, while
the younger is gloomily resentful of his career as a stand-in for his paper's
more successful theater critic. The play they're watching gets ever more lost
in its own complications, made worse by the actors' obvious panic backstage,
and the critics end up getting involved in the play against their wills. It all
ends up with my favorite closing line ever: "Puckeridge! You cunning
bastard." I hope to see it live someday.
*Out
of Order -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
Another
Asey Mayo mystery, bringing Asey's old boss Bill Porter back on the scene for
the first time since the first book. Bill and an annoying former classmate get
in a fistfight at the Harvard Club -- apparently a common thing for the two of
them -- on the day of the Harvard-Yale game. An ill-advised drunken bet
results, the details of which nobody seems to understand for sure, except that
the classmate seems to have goaded Bill into the fight on purpose for just that
reason. Bill's wife rounds up Asey to sort out what's going on, which leads to
some social criticism unusual for Taylor, who was a die-hard Landon Republican:
Asey is unsettled at the lavish meals at the rich people's houses when so many
people are out of work. An old saying about oysters is mentioned several times:
that they are ungodly, unkind, and uncharitable (Dad remembered the saying
appearing in Swift -- they're ungodly because you eat them without saying
grace, unkind because you eat them alive, uncharitable because only the shells
are left for the poor.) Dad was surprised at the scene where Asey sends the kid
who's tagging along after him to get him a couple hot dogs, "and get some
for yourself", and the kid winds up eating eight of them. Was he that
hungry just because he was a teenager, or because it was the Depression and he
didn't get to eat regularly? The bet turns out to be a dim-witted cover-up for
some rich people having stupidly lost their fortune, which seems like an
insufficient reason to kill three people, but I guess Taylor didn't think it
was really a mystery without a murder.
The
Political Economy of Art -- John Ruskin
I
thought I'd seen Ruskin at his worst, but I was wrong. This is his manifesto of
total cultural supremacism, not making an argument but simply stating as an
unquestionable truth that all art in history was produced by Christian Western
Europe. He says, as if there could be no possible disagreement, "There is
no art in America, none in Africa, none in Asia." I actually can't get
past that -- if he's capable of believing that the entire non-white world is
incapable of making art, then he can't possibly understand art or have anything
useful to say about it.
Persuasion
-- Jane Austen
Her
last novel and probably the best written. The heroine is Anne, a woman in her
late twenties, who was once engaged to a naval officer named Wentworth but
broke it off under pressure from her family, who considered Wentworth's social
standing too low. The story begins seven years later, at the end of the
Napoleonic Wars, with most of the Navy being mustered out and sent home. Anne's
family, hurting for money, lets their property to a retired admiral who turns
out to be an in-law of the still unmarried Wentworth. Anne and her younger
sisters become the center of a crowd of returning sailors and also their
cousin, long estranged from the family but now trying to patch things up (it
turns out he's a creep, and since he's the heir to the estate he's really just
trying to prevent Anne's father from remarrying and possibly having a son,
which would disinherit him.) A lot of the novel deals with the heavy power of
persuasion older relatives have on younger, and the inability of younger
relatives to stand up to it. Anne realizes that Wentworth is both still
attached to her and still hurt, and she finally asks him to forgive her for
caving to family pressure and they get engaged again. I liked it.
A
History of the World in 100 Objects -- Neil MacGregor
I'm
surprised there could be a successful radio program all about art objects the
listeners would just have to picture in their minds, but the BBC did it and
apparently it was well received. This book is a collection of the transcripts
of that program, but illustrated with photos of the objects, so the reader is
one up on the radio listener. It's well explained and the illustrations are
great; also I went to the British Museum a few weeks after reading it and had
fun finding the objects from the book. It starts with the oldest artifacts from
the museum -- cutting-stones from about a million and a half years ago -- and
ends with the most recent display item, a credit card. It was pretty
interesting.
The
Man Who Planted Trees -- Jean Giono
An
illustrated short story about a hiker in the Alps who wanders into a desolate
valley in Provence, where he meets a shepherd named Bouffier who is slowly and
methodically planting the valley with acorns he has brought from more fertile
regions. Over the next thirty or forty years, the hiker occasionally returns to
the valley to watch Bouffier's progress, seeing the valley gradually become a
mighty forest. It was really well-told and touching. It was made into a very
good animated film Lucy showed me some years ago.
Hair
-- Kurt Stenn
Just
what it says on the cover. It wandered a bit. Rather more of a collection of
thematically-related essays than a book, since there's no overall structure,
but a lot of it was interesting. There's a lot about the wig industry, of
course, and unusual demands on it -- Hasidic women, for example, are big
customers of wigs, since they're ritually proscribed from letting their hair
show, but their wigs need to be good enough to wear but bad enough to be
visibly fake, since if they were too convincing the women might be suspected of
not wearing a wig at all. There's also a section about how drug traces
stay in the hair a lot longer than in the body, which made me wonder if it's a
coincidence that the fad for pro athletes shaving their heads started just about
the same time more rigorous drug testing was being introduced. It wasn't
bad.
Unspeakable
Practices, Unnatural Acts --- Donald Barthelme
A
collection of post-modern short stories that I didn't really understand. The
only one I felt like I sort of got was "The Balloon", a story about a
miles-wide balloon that appears mysteriously over New York; some people run
around on top of it, some try to find paths that lead inside, some try to pop
it (probably a picture of people's reactions to art -- some appreciate the
surface, some look for deeper meaning, some feel threatened) but at the end the
narrator explains that he inflated the balloon for purely personal and
inexplicable reasons (i.e. the critics are all wrong.) I didn't connect with
it, really.
*Victoria
-- Knut Hamsun
A
love story, about Victoria and Johannes, two Norwegians who have loved each
other since childhood but are separated by an uncrossable social divide.
Johannes is from a working-class family, and though he educates himself, becomes
a famous writer, and travels the world, he will still never be welcomed into
Victoria's family's country house through the front door. Victoria is
eventually forced by her family to become engaged to an upper-class suitor, a
military officer, who is jealous and suspicious of Johannes even though
Johannes has moved to the city in order to avoid encountering them. Johannes
and Victoria occasionally meet at social events in the city, and once or twice
they have short conversations in the street, but these meetings are painful for
both of them. The officer is killed in an accident, but it's socially
impossible for Johannes to visit the family to condole with them. Not long
afterward Victoria falls ill and dies, and Johannes visits her grave before
leaving the area for good. It was a sad book but I liked it.
The
World As Will and Idea -- Arthur Schopenhauer
I
had a terrific professor in college, David Knauf, who retired my junior year
and gave me most of his office library: hundreds of plays and books of theater
criticism, along with several works of German philosophy, including this one.
David actually died of complications from AIDS before the semester ended. (I
remember his partner at the funeral talking about David’s father and uncle,
Ernst and Werner, who emigrated from Germany; because they lived in Brooklyn
they were universally known as Oinie and Woinie.) I put the book on my shelf in
1991 and it sat there unread until now; it wasn’t worth the wait. How did I
hate it? Let me count the ways. In the very first place, there's a long, long
preface, written about twenty years after the book was published, in which
Schopenhauer angrily whines that the book hasn't made him rich, and snarls that
the reason other people have university positions and he doesn't is that
they're all talentless toadies who will say anything to get ahead, while his
own shining intellect and respect for the truth have made everyone work against
him out of puerile jealousy. The whole book is very much in keeping with the
preface, and serves as an excellent illustration of what I think of as the Ayn
Rand mindset, which can be summed up as: "My worldview is based SOLELY on
pure objective reason -- DON'T QUESTION ME -- but no one agrees with me, so
that must mean everyone else is really stupid and only I understand the
truth." His philosophy is one of those life-is-nothing-but-misery affairs,
arguing "the best thing is never to be born, and next-best is to die as
early as possible," and he simultaneously tries to incorporate the idea
that all people are really, in some sense, the same person. There are dull
digressions on art that read rather like Stalinist criticism -- that is, art is
to be judged on how well it illustrates the principles of Schopenhauer's
philosophy, and in so far as it doesn't do that, it's bad art and only stupid
people like it. Also only Schopenhauer has ever understood Christianity
properly -- ditto for Hinduism -- and he wastes more pages explaining to people
why they have mistaken their own religions, although he makes sure to leave
himself time to spend hating Jews and women. I could go on but I'm tired of it.
The thing that surprised me was that very early on Schopenhauer discusses,
quite correctly, how philosophical exploration is really just people finding
ways to justify what they already believe by instinct, but then forgets all
about that as soon as he's discussed it. What a revolting person.
This
Is Your Brain On Music -- Daniel Levitin
A
good book on the physics of music, with a good explanation of the difference
between a harmonic and an overtone, which has always confused me. When you
pluck a string it vibrates at several frequencies at the same time. The main
frequency -- the "note" -- is called the fundamental. Technically an
overtone is any frequency higher than the fundamental, while a harmonic is a
frequency that's an integer multiple of the fundamental. (Including the integer
1, of course, which is why the first harmonic is lower than the first overtone,
which is the sort of thing that's always driven me batty.) It's generally the
overtones that make one instrument sound distinctly different to another instrument
even when they're playing the same note. There's a great deal of information on
the physiology of the ear and the parts of the brain responsible for
interpreting sound. Did you know that listening to music is one of the only
activities known to use every region of the brain and every neural subsystem? I
also really liked the section on consonant resolution, the phenomenon that
makes music sound "incomplete" unless it concludes on the expected
note. An example the book uses is the motif of the last movement of Beethoven's
Ninth Symphony, which is made up of two cadences that are identical except for
the final note: the first time through the cadence ends with re-re,
which makes you aware that it's not finished, while the second time the cadence
ends with re-do, which gives you a sense of resolution. I found it
fascinating that the Beatles' song "For No One" -- which deliberately
ends in the middle of a phrase (because it's a song about a messy breakup) --
is actually completed by the next song on that album, "Doctor
Robert", since the opening note of "Doctor Robert" is the note
that would have resolved the phrase at the end of "For No One".
I liked it a lot.
The
Haunted Tea-Cosy -- Edward Gorey
An
absurd retelling of A Christmas Carol, wherein the hero is visited by the
Bahhum Bug, a giant supernatural insectoid creature, who takes him through the
stages of Christmas Past, Present, and Yet To Come, illustrated with Gorey's
strange and intricate artwork. It was great.
The
Headless Bust -- Edward Gorey
The
story of the monumental hangover everyone had the day after the visit of the
Christmas spirits. The hero and the Bahhum Bug clean up in a desultory way and
the whole thing is pretty strange. Good artwork.
*Figure
Away -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo book set around the anniversary celebration of a Cape Cod town (very
similar to the Ashland anniversary, Dad says.) Someone seems to be trying to
sabotage the whole thing, and Asey -- as a local and a relative of lots of the
people running the show -- is called in to figure things out on the quiet. One
of the purposes of the festival is to draw in tourist money, although putting
up with the tourists requires a lot of gritting of teeth. Asey recalls a
tourist who took an heirloom quilt right off his clothes line and left fifty
cents for it. Taylor eventually decides that the bad guy is one of the town
selectmen, and evidence that he's been embezzling for years pops up out of
nowhere, even though the selectman is old and wheezy and she's previously
established that the bad guy outran a local in a chase that lasted twenty
minutes. (She even made a point of saying the local ran a 4:17 mile in
college!) I read once that it took Taylor about three weeks to write a novel;
clearly none of that time was spent editing.
Rosencrantz
and Guildenstern Are Dead -- Tom Stoppard
A
tragicomedy, by turns funny and bleak. The action of the play covers the events
happening offstage in Hamlet -- "Every exit is an entrance
somewhere else", as Stoppard says, and the play follows Rosencrantz and
Guildenstern while they're not actually talking to Hamlet. The two of them are
exceptionally uncertain people, not quite sure of what's really going on, or
what the people they talk to really want, or at times even which of them is
which. This is probably because, despite their high-minded conversation, they
don't really have any moral character; for instance, when they find out that
they are escorting Hamlet to England only for him to be murdered there, they
not only don't warn him but try to argue that they are only innocent bystanders
and have no responsibility to act. A big chunk of the play is taken up with the
two of them talking at cross-purposes with the Player King and his band, which
is good because those scenes are very funny and without them the play would be
miserable. I saw it live in London recently and I thought the Player King was
the best part of the show. I also thought Guildenstern delivered his final
speech very well -- a weary, puzzled monologue where he tries to figure out
where he went wrong: "There must have been some point where I could have
said 'No', and I missed it" -- the only time he comes close to recognizing
that he had a moral responsibility and didn't live up to it. An unpleasant play
but I liked the performance I saw.
A
Rage In Harlem -- Chester Himes
The
first of his 1950s novels following the careers of two black police detectives
called Grave Digger and Coffin Ed, ferociously angry men who are treated with
terrified respect by everyone in Harlem. They do the sort of policing where the
fist follows immediately on the question, and sometimes precedes it. The story
follows what happens when a Harlem handyman falls for the old "money
box" routine. (This is a scam where a con man claims he has a machine that
can turn ten-dollar bills into twenties, uses some planted twenties to fool the
mark into believing it, and gets him to pony up all his money to be doubled; a
phony cop busts in during the process and "arrests" the con man for
"counterfeiting" and confiscates the money. As a double dip the phony
cop shakes down the mark for a bribe to refrain from "arresting" him
too.) The con man puts his device in the handyman's cheap gas oven to
"heat up the ink", but just as the phony cop appears to make his
phony arrest, the faulty oven explodes, and everything goes wrong from there.
The woman who roped the handyman into the scheme grabs the money and makes a
run for it, pursued by the handyman (who thinks he's rescuing her), by the con
man and his partner (who want the money), by the handyman's much smarter
brother (who's after the money himself), by the handyman's employer (whose
money the handyman stole to give to the con man), and by the detectives (once
the bodies start falling.) It was a very good story.
The
Wind-Up Bird Chronicle -- Haruki Murakami
A
strange book. I had previously read the first chapter, which was published
separately as a short story, but without the context of the novel the story
didn't really make sense. The first chapter finds our hero, Toru, at home
during the day, having recently quit his job because he saw no prospects for
advancement. His wife has asked him to go out and search for their cat, who has
been missing for some days; in between searches he starts getting obscene phone
calls from a woman he doesn't know. He doesn't find the cat but does make
friends with a teenager named May, who seems to live by herself and doesn't
attend school for reasons she won't go into. In the novel a complex plot develops,
revolving around Toru's brother-in-law Noburu, whom he detests: a right-wing
academic making the transition to political demagogue. There's something
off-putting about Noburu (we later learn he's a serial rapist) and he's taking
steps to make his personal life newspaper-proof. One day Toru's wife Kumiko
doesn't come home, and Noburu tells Toru that Kumiko has left him and doesn't
want to see or speak to him. Toru speaks to mutual acquaintances, a pair of
fortune-telling sisters that Noburu's superstitious family sometimes consults,
and at the same time starts learning about the life story of a former neighbor
and the strange things that happened to him when he was trapped for several
days in a dry well in the desert in Mongolia during the Japanese invasion of
China. What he hears from the fortune-tellers seems to echo the neighbor's
story, and moved by an obscure impulse he climbs down to the bottom of a deep
dry well in the yard of a local abandoned house; while there he has a mystical
experience and seems to walk through the side of the well into an otherworldly
hotel, where he goes into a dark room and meets the woman who has been calling
him on the phone, although she won't let him see her face and warns him away
from the hotel, which she says is dangerous. Back in the real world he wakes up
with a strange bluish mark on his face and a conviction that somehow that hotel
is the key to finding out what happened to Kumiko, whom he thinks Noburu has
forced to leave him. The mark on his face seems to be recognized in some way by
a few people, including a faith healer who hires him to help revitalize her
clients, in return for buying the abandoned property so Toru can continue to
sit at the bottom of the well, hoping to return to the other world; in the mean
time he corresponds with May, who has moved away to work in a distant wig
factory and writes him strangely chatty letters about death and spiritual
disintegration. Eventually Toru returns to the other place through the well and
finds the woman again; it turns out the woman is in fact Kumiko, who is trapped
by an unexplained power Noburu has over her, and the phone calls Toru has been
getting were from her, a part of her psyche reaching out to him for rescue. In
the darkness of the hotel Toru is attacked by a guard, but hits him on the head
with a baseball bat he acquired under mysterious circumstances; when he returns
to the real world, the mark on his face now gone, he learns that Noburu has had
a cerebral hemorrhage, and he's convinced that this is a result of the fight in
the other world. Toru gets a message from Kumiko telling him that, now freed of
Noburu's power, she intends to unplug him from his life-support and so kill
him. In a last conversation with May we learn that Kumiko has killed Noburu and
gone to prison, and Toru is waiting for her sentence to run out.
One
thing that bothered me about the story was that looked at from a different
angle, Toru could easily be seen as a controlling stalker who refuses to
believe that his wife doesn't want to live with him any more, and who invents a
conspiracy among her relatives to keep her away from him, thus justifying his
obsessive refusal to let her go as a heroic rescue; but Toru is consistently
presented as sympathetic, so that set up a bit of an emotional dissonance for
me. Also, there are some frustrating gaps in the story, such as the
disappearance without explanation of the fortune-telling sisters; I found out
that this is because the translator cut out about sixty pages of the book and
also rearranged the order of some of the chapters, I don't know why. Maybe I'd
grasp the story better if I could read the whole thing. Overall, though, I
still liked it.
The
Murder of Charles the Good -- Galbert of Bruges (James Bruce Ross, trans.)
A
first-hand history of the murder of the Count of Flanders in Bruges in 1127 and
its aftermath. Galbert was a court notary, and he was actually present in the
Bruges church when the assassins surprised the Count at prayer and cut him
down. He gives a very clear day-by-day account of the next few months, as the
populace seized and killed the assassins, while the men who hired them -- the
Erembald family, who had badly misjudged the attitude of the people --
barricaded themselves in the church tower and withstood a siege for several
months. Unable to fight their way in to the well-defended tower, the
townspeople eventually started pulling the foundation apart, and the Erembalds
had to flee the tower just before it fell; they were all taken and tortured to
death. Galbert recorded all this as it happened, with digressions added later
to explain what was happening elsewhere at the same time, as the King of France
and the Burgundians both put forward their own candidates to replace the fallen
Charles. It was pretty interesting.
Much
More of This, Old Boy...? -- Peter Paterson
A
memoir of newspaper and magazine work in England over the second half of the
20th century. The author was raised in an orphanage and started working and
living on his own at age fourteen, starting as a copy boy and working his way
from small provincial papers to Bristol and then London, eventually spending
decades covering labor relations for the Spectator and the Times
before strangely shifting gears to television criticism, which seems like kind
of a waste of talent. The title comes from a traditional newspaper joke: when
reporters phoned in their stories to the copy desk, the copy editor would take
it all down and occasionally give a weary sigh and ask: "Much more of
this, old boy...?" It was pretty good reading. Paterson doesn't mind
telling stories against himself: he was a little embarrassed about never having
gone to school, and he used to say defensively that he'd been at "the
university of life", until a co-worker responded "Failed your degree,
did you?"
The
Broken Road -- Patrick Leigh Fermor
The
third of three books covering Fermor's walk across Europe in 1933-4. It's good
but not as well written as the previous two books, since he wrote it in the
2010s, nearly eighty years after the fact, relying on old journals unexpectedly
recovered from where they were lost in Romania in the thirties and filling in
the details from memory, and he died before he was finished. It's still
enjoyable, covering the last leg of the trip, from the lower Danube into Serb
territory in Yugoslavia and thence through Bulgaria, with a northerly detour to
Bucharest in Romania, before finally arriving in Istanbul just before New
Year's Eve 1934. In Bucharest he stayed in a brothel, which had nicer rooms
than the hotels he could afford, and he gives an interesting picture of it --
as a roomer he was treated very differently from the customers, eating in the
kitchen with the women who worked there, whom he describes as very friendly in
a wholly Platonic way. In fact just about everyone treated him very well --
there's a funny episode, though it probably didn't seem funny at the time, when
he got lost along the coast of the Black Sea at night in November, and, having
both fallen in the water and cut up his boots on the rocks, had to keep walking
to keep from freezing; he was composing his obituary in his head ("Irish
student found dead of exposure; foul play not suspected") when he ran
across a cave shared by Greek fishermen and Bulgarian goat-herders, who took
him in as though they'd been expecting him, the fishermen helping him to their
dinner and warming him up with raki while the goat-herders calmly stitched up a
new pair of goatskin boots. I liked it a lot.
*Octagon
House -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo mystery, largely about a chunk of ambergris that washes up on the
Cape and the people who kill each other over it. There's some good
Depression-era detail -- Taylor gets a lot of laughs out of the New Deal-type
WPA artist who paints a civic-pride mural in the post office; when a vandal
paints over it everyone agrees that the vandal should be given a vote of
thanks from the town. The local sawbones, Doc Cummings, gets a lot of page
time. Dad's favorite part was how Doc spends ten minutes declaiming about how
speechless he is. He also liked Taylor's description of Doc's car as a
"coffee grinder", noting that she was talking about the big
Rube-Goldbergian manual grinders people used in general stores before the war,
before vacuum-sealed pre-ground coffee became common. Dad says people still
used the old store grinders in Germany in the fifties.
*Franz
Kafka: A Biography -- Max Brod
More
of a memoir than a biography. Brod and Kafka met as teenagers and remained
close friends until Kafka died of tuberculosis when he was forty; this is a
pretty good look at Kafka's development as an artist (Brod generally critiqued
Kafka's early drafts) and his difficult relationship with his cold and
disapproving father. One thing Brod emphasized is that if you only knew Kafka
from speaking to him you would never guess what his writing was like, since in
person Kafka was friendly and full of lively and interesting conversation. Brod
argued, I thought insightfully, that this was not a mask -- neither the Kafka
of the writing nor the Kafka of the conversation was the "real" man;
the "real" man was a complex mixture of the two and he just chose to
emphasize one aspect of himself in his writing and another in his personal
relationships. Brod also says that when Kafka, toward the end of his life,
asked Brod to burn his unpublished manuscripts when he died, Brod flatly
refused and told Kafka to his face that if he wanted the manuscripts burned he
would have to entrust them to someone else, since Brod intended to publish them.
Kafka had plenty of time to appoint someone else but never did, so he probably
wasn't really as averse to having them published as all that. Not all of it is
wholly reliable: Brod incorrectly believed that Kafka had an illegitimate son,
for example, and his picture of Kafka's relationship with Milena Jesenská is
not consistent with the letters Kafka wrote her (which Brod hadn't read.) An
interesting book.
Summer
Moonshine -- P.G. Wodehouse
A
farce set in an English country house, owned by a baron who is too broke to pay
the house's upkeep and so has turned it into a summer hotel. The baron is a
good guy whose friends call him Buck, and the actual running of the hotel is
mostly managed by his daughter Jane, one of whose duties is tactfully shooing
away foreign visitors who expect Buck to be visibly aristocratic. Sharing the
work is Buck's secretary, Miss Whittaker, who was engaged to a guest at the
hotel, a friendly fellow called Tubby, but they've had a falling out and now
Miss Whittaker treats him with icily insulting politeness. Things get moving
when Tubby's brother Joe arrives to enlist Tubby's support against their
stepmother, whom they both despise; Joe has written a hit play, in which the
villain is recognizably the stepmother, and she's going to sue. Also arriving
is Jane's uncle, whom she's never met, and Jane's secret fiancé Adrian, a weedy
loser. Jane needs to shuffle everyone around to keep things running smoothly,
since they're expecting the arrival of a rich princess who may want to buy the house.
However, when the princess arrives, she turns out to be Joe and Tubby's
stepmother, plus it turns out she's previously had an affair with Adrian; not
to be out-complicated, Joe falls in love with Jane at first sight. Of course it
has to happen that Joe and Jane, Tubby and Miss Whittaker, and Adrian and the
princess will all pair off and get married, but the fun is seeing how Wodehouse
manages to throw all sixteen eggs into the air and have them end up all in
their proper rows unbroken. I thought it was great.
The
Iron Tonic -- Edward Gorey
A
strange story in dark rhyme about a bleak winter, illustrated with his eerie
macabre drawings of things such as children skating on a frozen pond known to
contain a colony of eels. I've always loved the way Gorey can hint at a whole
world of implications: a small foot sticking out of a snow drift with the
couplet "The infant dead beside the path/Escaped the orphanage's
wrath." I loved it.
Can't
Stop Won't Stop -- Jeff Chang
A
very readable history of hip-hop music. A lot of the early part tells the story
of DJ Kool Herc, a dance-music expert who in the sixties noticed that when he
played records in a club, the dancers would hang back waiting for the
instrumental breakdown, that being the best part of a song to dance to. So he
developed a routine of having multiple records spinning on multiple turntables,
and playing only the break from any song, switching out records to build
extended dance mixes; that's why it's called "break dancing".
Competition was hot among DJs to see who could build the best and most exciting
break mixes on the fly; Herc says DJs would scrape the labels off their records
to keep rivals from seeing what they were playing. The early rappers like
Afrikaa Bambaataa and Grand Master Flash would rap while a DJ played breaks
underneath, the rapper and the DJ cooperating to accentuate each other's beats,
a skill they called "flow" that became the mark of a great rapper.
The book also covers the graffiti-art movement in New York in the seventies, but
those parts were less interesting. There's also a stretch near the end that
goes into way too much detail about the office politics at Source
magazine. Overall, though, it was really interesting. I felt like a learned a
lot.
The
Carnival of Thieves -- Jean Anouilh
A
farcical play from the thirties, about a group of thieves who take advantage of
Carnival-time to assume grotesque disguises; one of the younger thieves rebels
against the hidebound rules of the leader, while another sets up to con a rich
family but ends up abandoning the game and eloping with the family's daughter.
Not bad, although it's probably funnier in French.
Real
Food, Fake Food -- Larry Olmsted
A
terrific and infuriating book about food packaging in America. It's a
long-festering grievance that the United States refuses to recognize other
countries' food trademarks -- that's why American manufacturers make
"parmesan" that doesn't come from Parma and "champagne"
that doesn't come from Champagne, and why even chain restaurants sell
"Kobe beef sliders" (Kobe beef is not commercially available in the
US; it's so expensive that no one would waste it in a hamburger; and its marbly
texture would make terrible hamburgers anyway.) European vintners are so mad
about it that a lot of them bottle their cheapest, crappiest wines with
"Napa Valley" on the label as payback. The US has tried to prevent
this with trade agreements, but won't agree to reciprocal trademark respect, so
in Europe "Napa Valley" means "cheap garbage". Serves us
right. (Also, it turns out that "Aspirin" became a non-protected
generic term not because of "common use" but because Bayer let the
trademark expire.) Within the US, there's almost no limit to what food
manufacturers can get away with, because the FDA is hobbled by hostile lobbying
and doesn't have any weapons for enforcement, even if it had the resources to
inspect everything properly, which it doesn't. Several independent investigations
have found that there is no American sushi restaurant that really serves
everything it claims to serve on the menu. One kind of whitefish looks just
like every other, so it's easy to substitute. Red snapper seems to be the most
common -- every team found that over ninety percent of the sushi they were sold
as "red snapper" was really some far less expensive whitefish. Big
companies are even more brazen -- Kraft sells a product called "100%
Grated Parmesan Cheese" that not only isn't Parmesan, it isn't even
cheese, consisting mostly of wood pulp. When they were sued Kraft calmly
maintained that the contents of the can were in fact 100% grated, so the label
was strictly correct, and they got away with it. In fact in most cases it
doesn't matter what they put on the label, because Congress won't let the FDA
assign specific legal meanings to certain phrases. Does your food have a label
that says "Cruelty-free"? "Grass-fed"? "Organic"?
"Free-range"? None of those phrases have any legal meaning, so anyone
who wants to can put any or all of them on anything and face no penalty. About
fifteen percent of olive oil made is "extra virgin", but in the US
over 95% of olive oil sold says "extra virgin" on the label. And so
on. I thought the book was great, though I could have lived with a little less
of the author rhapsodizing about the awesomeness of really authentic and
expensive food that I'll never eat.
*The
Good Soldier Schweik -- Jaroslav Hasek
A
very funny anti-war story from the twenties, following the misadventures of the
titular Josef Schweik (Svejk in Czech) who, hearing of the assassination
of Archduke Ferdinand, rushes off to public patriotic displays, bursting with
zealous enthusiasm -- but we soon see that his apparent zeal is really a front,
a parody of bone-headed militarism aimed at people too blind to see it.
Schweik's army career is a non-stop parade of cheerful noncompliance and open
insolence to his superiors, which he gets away with because they all think he's
mentally incompetent. He's constantly being yelled at by senior officers, who,
the more they berate him, the more they unintentionally reveal their own
stupidity and show how unsuited they are to hold any kind of authority. Dad
loved it, of course. It was publically burned by the Nazis -- a good
recommendation for anything in my book -- and Schweik has become something of a
hero of passive resistance in eastern Europe. It isn't complete, the author
having died before he was finished, but it was intended as a series of
self-contained volumes, so it's only the last volume that ends in mid-story. I
liked it a lot.
Snow
White -- Donald Barthelme
A
post-modern novel that finds Snow White and the dwarves inexplicably living in
a condo in New York in a contentious eight-way relationship that pleases no
one, Snow White least of all. Prince Charming hangs around but he's too aimless
and nihilistic to do any rescuing. The point of the book is more the prose than
the story. In most books where the main attraction is meant to be the aesthetic
pleasure of the arrangement of the words on the page, the whole thing is
usually an exercise in word play, which doesn't generally hold my interest --
that's why most of Nabokov doesn't appeal to me -- but here Barthelme seems to
just have been concentrating on writing weird, funny prose that's also,
considered as just an arrangement of words, aesthetically pleasing. I liked the
scene where the irritated dwarves decide to throw six-packs of Miller High Life
through the windshield of a man named Fondue. I really prefer plot-driven books
to word-art, but this was fun to read anyway.
*Pigeon
Feathers -- John Updike
The
first Updike I've ever read that I liked. It's an early collection of short
stories, mostly slice-of-life vignettes. The best was "A&P", a
good story about a teenage supermarket cashier whose slow day at work is
interrupted when a trio of teenage girls in bikinis come in to the store on
their way to the beach. The cashier watches them covertly, seesawing between
being embarrassed and admiring their un-self-conscious confidence. When the
three check out, the store's manager comes out of his office to berate them,
and the cashier, angry at the manager for embarrassing the girls for no reason,
quits on the spot in a tiny moment of heroism. I liked the ludicrousness of the
more-in-sorrow-than-in-anger rebuke the manager gives him -- imagine the
mind-set of someone who really believes that walking away from a high-school
summer job at the supermarket is something you'll regret all your life!
*The
Annulet of Gilt -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo novel, in which an old Army buddy of Asey's makes an appearance and
we learn that Asey was a secret agent during World War I, going on murky
missions to eastern Europe, which apparently everybody in Cape Cod knows,
although Asey firmly insists he spent the war peeling potatoes on a destroyer.
It turns out "annulet" is an old heraldic term for a ring, and
although a ring is the McGuffin in the story, calling it an "annulet"
seems to have no importance -- I'd be willing to bet Taylor just saw the word
somewhere and liked it. Not a lot of local color in this one -- there's a kids'
camera club going around using various locations for shooting "war
footage", but Taylor either got bored with them or forgot what she introduced
them for, because they drop out of the story halfway through and have no effect
on the mystery. Interestingly, there's a millionaire named Colvin who's been
living in Europe but has come back to the US (the book was written in 1938) and
Taylor, though a staunch opponent of Roosevelt herself, clearly means Colvin as
a portrait of a bad American -- someone who, though he has lived in Europe and
seen Fascism first-hand, still thinks that the New Deal is the real threat to
America. I feel it would be remiss of me not to mention that there's an escaped
elephant roaming around the Cape, which everyone accepts with almost
exaggerated aplomb -- Asey's cousin seems strangely untroubled to come home and
find an elephant eating her hedge. I can hardly think of any book that wouldn't
be improved by an elephant.
The
Sixth Extinction -- Elizabeth Kolbert
A
terrifying book about our ongoing destruction of our environment. It won the
Pulitzer a couple years ago for its vivid and clearly laid out picture of how
environmental catastrophe rushes toward us at every turn, like incoming water
on a small boat, with no one point where bailing will stop the inflow. Human
transport of invasive species all over the world; human over-predation of
animals; human over-exploitation of natural resources that other animals rely
on; human over-production of pollutants; human destruction of animal habitats.
Every major river in the world and most of the minor ones have been dammed in
several places, using up more than half of the planet's freshwater runoff.
We've introduced far more nitrogen than there are nitrogen fixers to receive
it. We've filled the atmosphere with carbon dioxide, a lot of which is absorbed
by the ocean to make carbonic acid, which is killing the ocean life. Not to mention
it's warming the whole planet, leading to the melting of the ice caps and
possibly an apocalyptic release of poisonous methane gases that are currently
trapped in the ice. We constantly carry species from one continent to another,
both intentionally and unintentionally, which not only leads to things like
Australia being covered with rabbits and the US drowning in kudzu vines, it
also leads to the spreading and mutation of drug-resistant microorganisms. It's
amazing we're still here at all, honestly. I remember that I was told in middle
school that the mastodons and the Neanderthals couldn't adapt after the Ice Age
ended and that's why they died out, but it turns out it's far more likely that
they died out because we killed them all. See, this is why I think Elon Musk is
wrong -- if we want anything of humanity to survive, we should put all-out
effort into building intelligent machines. We won't survive a mass extinction,
but robots will, and intellectually at least they'll be our children. Go robots!
The
Road to Little Dribbling -- Bill Bryson
This
book pulls off the rare combination of being both terrible and boring. What is
it about getting older that makes people start being proud of how rude and
abrasive they are? This is a rehash of Bryson's earlier book Notes From a
Small Island, but without the same spirit of fun. Bryson says at the outset
that he intends to write about different parts of Britain than he did last
time, but he doesn't hold to it. He grumpily travels around England and
Scotland and bitches about how everything is worse than it used to be, and goes
out of his way to show himself being an asshole to everyone. Can he possibly
think his kids-these-days groaning could be interesting to anyone at all?
Sunset
at Blandings -- P.G. Wodehouse
Wodehouse's
last novel, left unfinished at his death at age 93. His longtime editor Richard
Usborne put the manuscript in order and published it along with Wodehouse's
notes for the unfinished part of the book, as well as notes on planned
revisions for the completed part. Usborne also gave the book its title, a
gloomier one than Wodehouse himself would have chosen, certainly.
Appropriately, it has all the classic elements of a Blandings story: yet
another family niece (apparently every woman in England between seventeen and
twenty-six was a niece or godchild or ward or step-daughter of the Emsworth
clan) has fallen in love, as all the Emsworth nieces do, with a man who is in
every way a good egg but has no money. More of the poor Earl's endless supply
of harpy-like sisters come out of the woodwork to prevent the marriage, and the
Earl and the niece both turn for sympathy and help to the resourceful Uncle
Galahad, who brings the young man to Blandings (as an impostor, of course) in
the guise of an animal-art guru hired to paint a portrait of the Earl's prize
pig. Yet another of the family sisters turns up, this one, astonishingly, quite
decent and friendly (she was probably switched by elves or something.) Also on
the scene is the Chancellor of the Exchequer, who's in love with the friendly
sister but can't propose because he's hampered by the inescapable presence of
his stodgily proper bodyguard, who sticks to him like a limpet. Galahad takes
on his sister's case too, leaving him two sets of lovers to unite and a mean
sister to frustrate. The notes give an idea of how the story would have gone,
but Wodehouse revised everything he wrote several times, often rewriting whole
sections of a book if a funnier idea occurred to him, so it's really only a
suggestion. I'm glad to have read it, though. It's nice to know that the Earl
and Galahad had at least one sister who didn't make their lives a torment.
Buddha
-- Karen Armstrong
A
biography of the Buddha can't be really definitive, since we don't even know
whether he lived in the sixth or fifth century BCE, and on top of that a lot of
the stories about Gautama's life are actually allegories intended to
demonstrate a moral lesson, but given the unavoidable limitations this was a
really good job. There are two versions of the Buddhist scriptures, one in
Pali, the language Gautama spoke, and one in Sanskrit, which was the lingua
franca of the subcontinent at the time. English uses the Sanskrit for most
Buddhist terminology -- so dharma instead of dhamma, Nirvana
instead of Nibbana, and so on. It's known that Gautama spent some time
as an ascetic before deciding that the path to enlightenment must be a middle
way between self-indulgence on one hand and self-denial on the other. I was
really interested in the way the stories about the Buddha were understood even
at the time to be illustrative rather than strictly literal. For example, the
story of how Gautama finally became enlightened tells how he was sitting under
a tree while the gods rooted for him, and during the night he was confronted by
a demon called Mara. "Mara" is actually the part of the Buddha's own
soul that doesn't want to become enlightened because it clings to selfishness,
to the freedom to indulge his own desires without caring what consequences they
will have on other people; he's the embodiment of what the Buddha called the
three fires in the soul that enlightenment extinguishes: greed, hatred, and
ignorance. Anyway, Mara approaches the Buddha at the head of an army, riding a
huge war-elephant and in the guise of a cakavatti, a conquering
warrior-king, sprouting a hundred arms, each holding a different weapon. (Mara
thinks he can solve all problems with violence.) Pointing at the Buddha's seat
under the great tree, Mara demands that he give it up -- a man detached from
life does not deserve such a place. "I belong there, not you!" The
Buddha calmly answers that Mara has done nothing to deserve a seat of honor,
since all his accomplishments are destructive, while he, the Buddha, has spent
his life giving alms and devoting himself to compassion: "Who can say that
he has seen Mara help anyone?" Mara bellows that he has his army to
witness his deeds, while the Buddha is alone. "Who will bear witness for
you?" he demands. In response, the Buddha does something that no cakavatti
would ever do: he asks for help. He places his right hand on the ground and
begs the Earth to be his witness. Upon this, the ground shakes and the Earth
speaks: "I WILL BEAR HIM WITNESS!" Mara's army flees in terror and
his elephant falls to its knees, and Mara has to admit defeat. (This is why you
often see statues of the Buddha sitting with his right hand touching the
ground, in the gesture now called "dispelling of demons".) The story
illustrates the Buddha's extinguishing his own selfishness and so becoming
enlightened, and also shows that the Buddha's Middle Way is not against nature,
but in harmony with it, and therefore achievable by anyone. The Buddha lived
for over forty years after he became enlightened, showing that spiritual awakening
is not incompatible with living in the world. There's a story that one
day the Buddha was sitting and thinking by the side of a road when a traveler
passed by and saw that he was not an ordinary man. The traveler asked him if he
was a god, and the Buddha answered that he wasn't. When the traveler, still
puzzled, asked how he should describe the Buddha to his friends, the Buddha
answered "Tell them you have seen a man who has woken up."
The
Marble Faun -- Nathaniel Hawthorne
This
is sort of a love story and sort of a Gothic beautiful-woman-with-a-dark-past
story, but what it really is, is an awful fetishization of "purity".
There are four main characters, but the heroine of the story is Hilda, a New
England woman in her twenties living in Rome and studying art. All the other
characters, plus the omniscient narrator, go on and on and on about how
innocent and tender and virginal and stainless and childlike and pure and
angelic she is, and how this specifically is what makes her so attractive, which
really got to be nauseating -- I started to feel as though the narrator were
secretly Humbert Humbert. What really stood out for me, aside from the
child-molester creepiness, was the almost frantic anti-Catholicism. Hilda
visits St. Peter's, and her artistic sensibility is so overwhelmed by its
grandeur that she actually touches the holy water in the basin, and is on the
very verge of making the sign of the cross, until a sudden vision of her mother
weeping at her apostasy breaks the evil spell and she flicks the water off her
hand as if it were acid. A little later on, a sculptor she knows -- an older
man who's supposed to be the moral center of the story -- sees her having a
conversation with a priest and immediately accosts her and sternly interrogates
her about her orthodoxy, just as if he were Cotton Mather trying a witch.
The plot isn't much; Emerson called the novel "mush" and I agree. I
wouldn't recommend it.
Always
Outnumbered, Always Outgunned -- Walter Mosley
An
excellent collection of short stories about a black man in his fifties named
Socrates Fortlow, who lives in an abandoned building in Los Angeles, after
serving twenty-seven years in prison for killing his two best friends in a
drunken fight. Because of his criminal record he can't get a job so he collects
cans and brings them to the supermarket, where the white teenagers make him
wait in smoldering resentment, sometimes for hours, before they sneeringly take
the cans. Prison has taught him to keep his rage on the inside but it seeps through
sometimes. There's a good scene where he meets a robber who brags about his
technique of wearing crummy clothes over a good suit so he can rob someone and
then ditch the outer layer and walk away as an upright citizen who doesn't fit
the description. Socrates lays into him for causing trouble for other black
people: "You say you wear garbage clothes, you mean me, you dress like me.
That's why people look at me they see a robber." It was a good read.
Under
Heaven -- Guy Gavriel Kay
A
good adventure-intrigue novel, set in an imaginary version of China during the
Tang Dynasty and revolving around the An Lushan rebellion of the mid-8th
century CE. Our hero, Shen Tai, in his late twenties, is a former soldier who
left the army after a traumatic campaign in Mongolia in order to become a
Taoist scholar, but following the death of his father he left the capital and
now lives in a valley in the no-man's-land between China and the Tibetan
empire. The valley has been a battlefield many times over the centuries, and
Shen Tai spends his time digging graves for the bones of the thousands of
soldiers who lie dead there, as an act of piety on behalf of his family (his
father was a general in a battle that was fought there), which doesn't seem a
half-bad way to spend your life, actually. He lives alone, since people avoid
the valley for fear of the ghosts of the dead armies, but after two years of
grave-digging he receives two visits. The first is an emissary from the queen
of the Tibetans, who as an acknowledgement of his pious work has made him a
present of purebred Tibetan horses; one such horse would be a fortune no
ordinary man could ever afford, and she has given him two hundred and fifty,
putting him in an impossible position. Immediately after this he is visited by
a Chinese messenger, who turns out to be an assassin, there to kill him on
behalf of a former romantic rival who is now the prime minister. He survives,
but now has to leave the valley and return to the dangerous intrigue of the
capital, both to sort out the assassins and to find a way of delivering the
horses to the stables of the Army without being murdered by rival generals who
want all the horses for their own corps. Luckily he has the help of a second
assassin who was dispatched by a friend to stop the first one, and of the
real-life great poet Li Bai, who was so honored for his poetry that he was
called "the banished Immortal" (meaning he was so talented he must
have been a god who was banished from Heaven, probably for writing a disrespectful
poem about the chief of the gods.) There's also a good secondary plot involving
Shen Tai's sister escaping hunters and wolves across the steppes of Mongolia.
It was a good story, a real page-turner.
*Spring
Harrowing -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo mystery, set during the run-up to the war -- one character has
recently resigned from the Navy, which everyone thinks very strange, but it
turns out he was medically discharged for sleepwalking. There's a lot of
discussion of the changes in the coastline caused by the great hurricane of
1938 (the year before the book came out) which interested Dad a great deal. Dad
also liked the murder victim because he was a man who collected all kinds of
things. One of his curios was an Indian weapon called a wagh nakh, a
sort of brass knuckles with raking blades attached; this was the murder weapon,
and the murderer intended to make it look as though the victim had been killed
by a wild cat (serendipitously there's a neighbor who keeps lynxes.) Asey
recognizes the weapon, though, because he knows everything the plot requires
him to know. My favorite bit was when the doctor, who often assumes an air of
martyrdom, remarks sourly that "My wealthy patients disappear as fast as
they can, but the poor are always with me."
The
Real Cool Killers -- Chester Himes
A
good murder mystery set in 1950s Harlem. It's really well done, fast-paced and
exciting. A slumming white guy hanging around a Harlem bar gets attacked by a
black man with a knife, which starts a brawl; fleeing outside, the white man --
very much out of place and even more conspicuous in his bloody suit -- catches
the eye of a local drunk, who pulls a gun and chases the white guy down the
street, shooting. The hard-case detectives Grave Digger and Coffin Ed arrive to
find the white man shot to death in the street. They arrest the drunk, but a
street gang calling themselves the Real Cool Moslems (really local teenagers in
fake beards) cause a distraction and spirit the drunk away. After settling
everything down, the detectives find that the gun they confiscated from the
drunk is a stage prop that only shoots blanks. So the rest of the story follows
two paths: on the one hand figuring out who really shot the white guy, and on
the other hunting down the gang and finding out why they got involved. The two
paths cross, of course. A really good read.
Browsings
-- Michael Dirda
A
collection of columns by the book critic for the Washington Post. They're not
reviews of new books; they're mostly appreciations of books he likes. Since his
favorite genre is "adventure stories from about 1880 to about 1950",
a genre I feel is criminally overlooked, I was very much on his side right from
the beginning: when someone ends his introduction with "Oh, one more
thing, as Lieutenant Columbo used to say", I know he's the right
sort. How could I not love a guy who taught a college literature class
with a reading list of Kidnapped, The Lost World, Kim, The
Man Who Was Thursday, Captain Blood, Double Indemnity, Red
Harvest, and At The Mountains of Madness? I got a long list of books
I want to read from these columns.
Mozart
-- Peter Gay
A
well-written biography of Mozart's too-short life. The biggest figure in his
life was his grasping and manipulative father, himself a musician, who seems to
have resented his son all his life for being a better pianist and composer than
he was. Before Mozart was four years old his father was dragging him all over
Europe to perform; like many child stars he suffered some long-term consequences.
As an adult he was full of nervous energy, apparently having trouble sitting
still, and he had fits of temper over trivial things -- although it's hard to
know how much of this was just the unsurprising behavior of an artist who was
always insecure financially, and exaggerated because he was famous. He also had
what the author calls a "startling fondness" for scatological humor,
and his letters to his sisters do make surprising reading. It certainly didn't
help that his awful father called him a traitor for getting married (as long as
he remained a bachelor all the money he made came to his father, with none
going for trivial things like supporting a wife and children.) After Mozart
escaped to Vienna his father took to writing vicious letters blaming Mozart for
his mother's death, never letting up until he himself died some years later,
and good riddance. I had thought Mozart lived in dire poverty, but actually he
made quite a lot of money; it's true he could never make ends meet and was
constantly borrowing from people, but that was because he had no idea how to
budget -- his father was a miser and he never had any money of his own until he
was almost thirty. He was buried in a "common grave", but that
doesn't mean a pauper's grave, it just means a grave for someone who wasn't
noble. Under Austrian law at the time all funerals had to be modest, but his
was as formal as the law allowed, and his friends from court attended,
including Salieri, whose rivalry with him was more friendly than not. Legend
has him dying of sheer want, but in fact it was some sort of rheumatic fever.
He really did keep composing the Requiem Mass on his deathbed, though.
Laughing
Gas -- P.G. Wodehouse
A
body-switching story, and also a send-up of Hollywood, particularly the
treatment of child stars. Our hero is Reggie, whose stuck-up relatives have
dispatched him from England to California with orders to find his runaway
cousin Eggy and keep him out of trouble (by which they mean not letting him
marry someone unsuitable.) On the cross-country train Reggie meets the actress
April June, who (after finding out he's an earl) lays on the all-American
sweetheart routine with a trowel. The smitten Reggie forgets all about his
cousin until they meet by accident at a party, where Reggie learns that Eggy is
engaged to Reggie's ex-fiancée Ann (which is good because Ann is great, but bad
because Ann hasn't been able to stop Eggy's problem drinking.) Ann tries to
warn Reggie about April, but he ignores her and is on the point of proposing
when a toothache sends him on an emergency visit to the dentist, where he meets
a famous twelve-year-old movie star named Joey who is also there for a
tooth-pulling. They both go under anaesthetic at the same time, and somehow
this causes them to switch bodies. Reggie, in Joey's body, is appalled to find
he has to live at the house of the head of his studio, with no contact with his
parents, and under the thumb of a mean-spirited housekeeper who feeds him on
dried prunes. Meanwhile Joey, in Reggie's body, is delighted to find that
Reggie is built like a gorilla and he sets out to find people who have been
mean to Joey and sock them one. Joey is currently co-starring in a movie with
April, and Reggie gets to see what she's really like (awful) while also getting
reacquainted with Ann, who coincidentally has just been hired as Joey's
publicist, a tough job since the real Joey has been misbehaving in hopes of
breaking his contract, while Reggie in Joey's body absent-mindedly smokes in
front of tabloid reporters. Joey and Reggie keep crossing paths at Eggy's
place, and their behavior convinces Eggy he's gone mad and should quit
drinking. With the help of the house servants (who it turns out are all
would-be actors hoping to catch the studio head's eye) Reggie-as-Joey gets out
a window to run away, and accidentally runs into Joey-as-Reggie, who has just
belted a few studio executives and is escaping on a stolen police motorcycle.
The collision makes them switch back, and the real Joey happily gets sent home
to Ohio in disgrace while the real Reggie skips town to avoid getting arrested
for assault, and, once again engaged to Ann, can report at home that Eggy has
gotten sober and safely married a respectable leader of the temperance
movement. It was pretty good.
*Dr.
Johnson's Women -- Norma Clarke
Biographies
and critical studies of the leading female authors of Johnson's lifetime, most
of whom he knew and was on friendly terms with. A little dry, but not bad.
The
Eastern Stars -- Mark Kurlansky
This
was marketed as a baseball book, but it isn't really. It's more a look at
Caribbean poverty, with the small town of San Pedro de Macoris -- which has
produced a surprising number of major-league players considering its population
is under twenty thousand -- serving as the tie-in to baseball, with its local
team, the sad-sack Estrellas Orientales, providing the book's title.
Using baseball as the hook might not have been the best idea, since Kurlansky
is clearly not a baseball fan and he makes a lot of really basic mistakes when
talking about the game. The non-baseball parts are much better, describing the
long arm of colonialism: after the Spanish slaughtered the Taino Indians, they
brought in huge numbers of African slaves to work and die in the sugar cane
fields, turning Santo Domingo into a single-crop economy, which collapsed when
sugar stopped being a cash crop, leaving the Dominicans in a state of crushing
poverty they haven't recovered from yet. A depressing book.
Cutting
Along the Color Line -- Quincy T. Mills
A
book about the history of black barbers in America. The subject was really
interesting but the writing was extremely dry and academic, so it took some
getting through. Also, the author said right up front that he tried to
interview barbers for the book but was met with uncooperative hostility, mostly
because he had dreadlocks, so everything in the book comes from written
sources. Barber shops were battlegrounds for civil rights in the twenties and
again in the sixties. Throughout the nineteenth century nearly all barbers were
black, both because it was considered a menial occupation and because white
customers considered it appropriate for blacks to be their body-servants. White
barbers became more numerous in the twentieth century and they tried to drive
the black barbers away from white customers, both by direct violence and by
trying to establish state barbering boards, which would administer examinations
and issue licenses, both of which of course would be closed to blacks, either
openly or through silent agreement. Many black barber shop owners were
prominent in state politics, though, since they had their finger on the pulse
of the black community, and they used their influence to protect their shops.
In fact many of them owned separate barber shops for white and black customers;
Zora Neale Hurston worked as a manicurist in a black-owned whites-only shop and
said that the employees would get angry if a black customer tried to get
served, because that would drive away the white customers the shop relied on.
Throughout the sixties white barber shop owners tried to keep blacks out on the
grounds that black and white hair are so different that white people literally
couldn't cut black hair, which led to bizarre scenes in court where jurors had
to take close-up looks at witnesses' scalps. The barber shop business seems to
have settled into a kind of voluntary segregation for now, as black customers
generally prefer a place where they can speak freely away from hostile
listeners. This could have been a really great book if the writing weren't so
wooden.
Treason
By the Book -- Jonathan D. Spence
A
very interesting book about propaganda and the best way of dealing with
dissidents. In China in the early 18th century, during the reign of the Yongzheng
Emperor (fifth ruler of the Qing Dynasty), an obscure provincial named Zeng
wrote a few books criticizing the Emperor in abusive terms -- blaming his bad
governance for causing natural disasters and accusing him of having his
relatives murdered, that sort of thing. The advisers in the capital all wanted
Zeng executed, but the Emperor thought it might be better P.R. to have Zeng
admit he was wrong, so he had Zeng brought to Beijing and essentially told him
"You don't know squat about this country and I'll prove it to you."
So Zeng got locked in a house where he had to sit and read through all the
government paperwork for the last ten years -- and write book reports and
essays on it! While he was doing that, the Emperor took the unusual step of publishing
a rebuttal to Zeng's book, which he wrote himself; I was impressed by his calm
remark that natural disasters happen all the time, century after century,
whether people are good or bad, and the test of a ruler is not whether
disasters happen but how well he relieves his people from them, which is more
sense than a lot of people have right now. Also applicable today: a lot of the
opposition to the Qing was based on ethnic hatred, because the Qing were
Manchurian, unlike the Ming they replaced, who were Han. Zeng's book said that
everything outside China was barbaric and only Chinese were truly human. The
exasperated Emperor answered, "This cannot be true. Did not Master
Kung" [Confucius] "write that 'Harmony will prevail throughout Heaven
and Earth, all things will be nourished and will flourish'? The world is vast,
and however large our land appears to us living in it, it is only a hundredth
part of the whole. The Tao is the same everywhere; how then can there be one
Heaven and Earth for China and another for the outer tribes?" Zeng
eventually came to agree that he was wrong, and the arguments in his book were
based on rumors, which were probably part of a whispering campaign started by
the Emperor's brothers. The Emperor let Zeng go home, where he wrote a book
called Awakening From Delusion, though he did have the rumormongers Zeng
had talked to rounded up and killed. A really good read.
*Banbury
Bog -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo mystery, not one of the better ones. The motive for the murder is introduced
four pages before the end, obviously made up on the spur of the moment when
Taylor finally decided who the murderer was. Also there's an unusual amount of
"scene-setting" with copious descriptions of a heavy fog that sets
in, but the fog doesn't affect the plot in any way -- no one hides in it, it
doesn't prevent Asey from driving at high speeds on back roads -- so it seems
strange that Taylor should make such a big deal out of it. Dad liked the scenes
where Asey and his companions search the basement of an old house, and Asey
points out that the basement is a circle, which allowed the builders to use the
smallest possible number of bricks. (Dad notes that there were no brick yards
on the Cape when the house was built so the bricks would have to be brought in
from near Boston, which is why they were so expensive.) Inevitably there's some
vaudeville business with people mishearing "Banbury" as
"cranberry". Kind of forgettable.
Brass
Knuckles -- Frank Gruber
A
collection of Gruber's 1920s short stories about Oliver Quade, the Human
Encyclopedia, from the old pulp magazines. They're puzzle-mysteries; in each
story Quade, an encyclopedia salesman, cons or gate-crashes his way into some
event where he's not supposed to be -- state fairs, horse races, cock-fighting
meetings -- in order to give his spiel and sell his encyclopedias. Some crime
or other always occurs, and the itinerant outsider Quade is always the main
suspect, until he uses some obscure fact from the encyclopedia (which he's
memorized) to show up the dim-witted local cops and expose the real bad guy.
Kind of formulaic, and the writing is only competent, but they were still
enjoyable.
Colonel
Jack -- Daniel Defoe
A
picaresque novel about a London boy called Jack, raised in a tenement in the
late 1600s by a "nurse". Since both the other boys the nurse has in
her charge are also called Jack (that being the most common name given to
illegitimate boys) she distinguishes them by the nicknames Captain, Major, and
Colonel. The nurse dies when Jack is ten and all three Jacks are left homeless.
The other two soon leave the city, while Colonel Jack supports himself by petty
theft and sleeps in the warm ashes underneath a glass-house. He's eventually
recruited as an assistant by an older thief and taught how to pick pockets, and
goes on to a long career as a thief and occasional highwayman until being
crimped and sold into involuntary servitude in Virginia. He escapes and joins
the Army, and fights in Europe in the War of the Spanish Succession. He marries
several times but each wife turns out to be an adulterer or a drunk or both. It
was pretty good, although I wasn't as happy with the ending as Defoe probably
intended because when Jack eventually becomes a prosperous planter in Virginia,
of course he's making his money off the backs of slaves, which doesn't bother
him at all.
Spook
-- Mary Roach
A
book about looking into the various claims of evidence of a life after death, and
the unsurprising conclusion that none of them meet any kind of standards for
proof. I didn't think it was that great.
The
Second Life of Nick Mason -- Steve Hamilton
I
really liked this. I bought it in the airport in San Jose and finished it
before the plane crossed the Mississippi. The anti-hero, Nick, is a career
burglar doing twenty years in prison after he took the fall for another guy
shooting a cop. In prison he meets a crime lord named Cole, who's in for life.
It turns out that Cole still pulls strings from prison, and he offers to get
Nick released, on the condition that on the outside Nick will do whatever Cole
tells him to. Cole lays it out: "This isn't freedom, this is
mobility." Even though he knows this means becoming a killer -- Cole plans
to have Nick murder the witnesses for Cole's upcoming retrial -- Nick agrees,
both to get out of prison and so he can see his daughter. (It's an iron rule of
an anti-hero story that there must be a pluckily adorable preteen daughter who
serves as an excuse for whatever the anti-hero does.) Cole forces the cop who
arrested Nick to recant his testimony and resign in disgrace, so Nick's
conviction is vacated. The cop's former partner, Sandoval, knowing that the
recantation was fake and that Cole must have sprung Nick for his own reasons,
becomes obsessed with Nick and determined to put him back in prison. The novel
follows Nick through his education in the assassination business, his first
hit, his reconnection with friends and enemies from before he went away, and
his open contest with Sandoval. It was gripping.
The
Uncollected Wodehouse -- David A. Jesen, ed.
Somewhat
misnamed, as many of the stories were collected during Wodehouse's lifetime in The
Man Upstairs. The rest are minor early comedies, the best being
several stories about a hard-luck boxing promoter and the bizarre lengths he
goes to in order to try to motivate his world-beating but easily distracted
fighter. They were pretty funny.
Men
Without Women -- Haruki Murakami
A
collection of short stories, mostly about alienation, I think. In some the
narrator is the protagonist, in others the narrator is an outside observer. In
every case the main character is a man who has tried to fill an existential
void in his life by loving a woman and failed, with consequences ranging from
mid-life career change to suicide by fasting. (The one exception is a weird
surrealist piece that's a reversal of The Metamorphosis -- that is, one
day a verminous insect wakes up to find that it has inexplicably turned into a
human named Gregor. I thought that one was better in conceit than in
execution.) The one I liked best was "Drive My Car", about a widowed
famous actor who hires a driver because he's lost his license due to glaucoma
and a DUI. Over the course of months he tells the driver about his late wife
and how, though as far as he could tell she was always happy with him, she
conducted serial affairs all through their marriage; although he knew about
them he never spoke to her about it, which he now regrets. After her death from
cancer he sought out one of her lovers (who didn't know him) and spent six
months as his drinking buddy, to try to understand his wife, but it didn't tell
him anything, really. He finally concludes that the affairs didn't have
anything to do with him or the love between him and his wife, but were just an
aspect of his wife he'd never seen and didn't understand, a kind of blind spot.
City
Life -- Donald Barthelme
A
collection of post-modern short stories that didn't really engage me. I did
like "Kierkegaard Unfair to Schlegel", an imagined transcript of a
therapy session, about the narrator's inability to turn off his perception of
literary irony when he's not reading, so he sees subtext in everything. He
draws an arresting word-picture of the military-surplus stores, and how the
people who buy the obsolescent uniform gear and wear it for ironic purposes
form a kind of clown army as a subversive counterpoint to the real one. Most of
the others don't really stand out in my memory.
Invisible
Man -- Ralph Ellison
A
disturbing novel about personal identity and racial identity, and how life in
America forces them to be the same thing. It's told by a nameless narrator
living in an illegal underground apartment he's made by walling off sections of
sub-basements of New York tenements; the narrator is a black man, and he
explains that his color makes him socially invisible. The action of the novel
is told in flashbacks, the narrator recounting his life of disillusion: how he
grew up in the South in the thirties and really internalized Booker T.
Washington's racial-improvement program, eventually going to a black college
whose president is a nationally-admired black leader. While a student he
accidentally lets a rich white visitor see some of the truth of rural black
poverty, and he gets called on the carpet for it. He has a terrible shock when
the president's angry diatribe shows him that the apparent mutual respect of
the black leaders and white donors is a false front on both sides. Expelled
from the school, he goes to New York and joins the Communist Party, where he
becomes a popular speaker and agitator, wholly embracing the party line and
believing it will lead to racial equality, until he comes to realize that the
white higher-ups are only using the black agitators to cause unrest, and
letting the blacks take the punishment while escaping consequences themselves.
Mirroring his spiritual injuries, he's also physically damaged -- he breathes
toxic fumes at a paint factory, and instead of medical treatment the white
doctors give him electroshock therapy. Betrayed in turn by integrationism,
Communism, and black nationalism, he retreats to his underground headquarters
to gather himself and recover his bearings mentally while preparing to return
to the surface and force the world to see him. A powerful story.
Serve
the People -- Jen Lin-Liu
A
very good book about an American-born Chinese woman who lived in Beijing and
Shanghai in the 2000s, first as a freelance journalist and later as the food
editor for a Chinese magazine. She went to a cooking school where she learned
the basics from a grumpy survivor of the Cultural Revolution (typical for cooks
of his age, he had simply been taken out of his previous job and told he was a
cook now.) She did both better and worse than the other students: better
because she hung around the cook and copied everything he did, worse because
cheating among the students was simply a matter of course, but as a foreigner
no one would help her. Similarly, as a foreigner with no experience outside her
government cooking class, no one would hire her; she got jobs by working for
places that couldn't be picky, barely-hanging-on noodle stands and snack stands
that survived on the street lunch trade. She also learned to make dumplings
from her upstairs neighbor, a woman who told her a great deal about living
under the Maoist regime. It was a fun read.
Boxing
Stories -- Robert E. Howard
I
was surprised to find I didn't like these at all. Howard was a brilliant
storyteller, and judging from his outstanding pulp fiction I would have thought
boxing would be right in his wheelhouse, but the stories are poorly written and
boring. Every fight proceeds exactly the same way: our hero fights a much
stronger opponent and gets his head handed to him, but through sheer force of
will stays on his feet and eventually wins because he just has to. The fights
are mind-numbingly repetitive, every move the same and described in exactly the
same words: the hero invariably sinks his left mitt to the wrist in the other
guy's midriff -- seriously, that phrase appears at the midpoint of every single
fight. What a disappointment.
*The
Criminal C.O.D. -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo mystery, this one a real farce where Asey finds a dead body, which
goes missing, turns up somewhere else, then goes missing again, and so on until
it turns up inside a package mailed to the doctor's house. Most of the book is
an extended game of who's-got-the-button, including more than one drive to
Boston (Dad notes that this was a very long trip in the days before expressways
so Asey must have really been tearing up the roads.) The old vaudeville joke
about the white and black horses is mentioned but not told, and I was surprised
to see in Dad's notes that he didn't recognize the joke; it seems just the sort
of thing he would know. (A farmer is puzzled why his black horses eat twice as
much hay as his white horses, until his friend points out that he owns twice as
many black horses as white horses.) The solution is even sillier than usual,
with Asey suddenly remembering a few pages from the end that oh yeah, this
guy's family owns an old ice house, where he must have stowed the body, and
there's totally a good reason for him to be the murderer based on all the stuff
I found out in Boston that I didn't mention to anyone until now. I did like it,
though, for the fun picture of running a local election on the Cape in the
thirties, including a funny scene where one side sets a booby trap for the
other candidate to make him trip in mud and then have to walk unsteadily in the
wrong size boots, so he stumbles into the town meeting looking as if he'd
gotten drunk and fallen in a ditch. It was pretty good.
Clockers
-- Richard Price
A
crime novel set in the early 90s in a fictional version of Jersey City. There
are two main characters, both of whom I kind of hated, whose stories are told
in alternating chapters: Strike, a drug dealer, and Rocco, a homicide
detective. Strike is about nineteen and has risen in the local dealing hierarchy
because he's careful and intelligent and doesn't use drugs himself. However, he
realizes he isn't going to rise any higher when his boss tells him to kill
another dealer who's been skimming, and he realizes he doesn't have it in him
to just murder someone in cold blood. He tells his problems to his older
brother Victor, who -- drunk and furious at his dead-end life -- goes and kills
the guy himself. Rocco and his openly racist partner arrive to examine the
crime scene. Rocco, in his forties, is the kind of guy who works late and stays
out drinking rather than deal with problems at home, as all the cops in the
book seem to be, and also like them his main motive is proving himself right.
He won't believe that the usually clean-living Victor is a killer, despite his
confession, so he decides Strike must have done it and sets out to bully and
harass Strike into confessing, eventually going so far as to set up and arrest
Strike's boss in a drug bust and tell the boss that Strike sold him out,
leading to the boss putting out a hit on Strike, who actually almost dies from
a perforated ulcer before the killer even finds him. The book actually makes me
feel a little bad for Strike, despite the fact that he's a low-life who uses
ten-year-old kids to run his drugs for him. Eventually Rocco, who's realized
that Victor did it after all, saves Strike from his boss by driving him in to
Grand Central and putting him on a bus out of town. It's not a happy ending,
because it's pretty obvious both of them will come to bad ends after the book
is over; Strike, who didn't finish high school and has no skills, will
certainly become a drug dealer again wherever he ends up, and eventually get
killed; Rocco is sure to be divorced soon and will probably drink himself to
death before he's fifty. The writing is very good, but the book is six hundred
pages long and depressing, so it took me a long time to finish it.
The
Life of Samuel Johnson -- James Boswell
I
last read this about twenty years ago, so when I ran across a really nice
three-volume edition at Recycle Books I decided to read it again. It amazes me
that so high-minded a man as Johnson could put up with a low vulgarian like
Boswell, a shameless boot-licker and parasite, who happily admitted that he
only went to church on Easter to see how Johnson behaved there. It's even more
amazing that someone like Boswell could have written such an incredibly good
book. It's fascinating from start to finish, a thoroughly engrossing picture of
the most learned man of a learned age. The picture isn't fully rounded; Boswell
only knew Johnson for the last twenty years of his life, and though he makes an
effort at covering Johnson's younger days it's pretty thin. It's all the more
so because Boswell petulantly rejected all accounts of Johnson given by Mrs.
Thrale (Johnson's closest friend) and others who had known him longer,
obviously out of pure jealousy; Boswell was determined that only he should be
the official torch-bearer of Johnsoniana, and he was tireless in insisting that
Mrs. Thrale was mistaken or lying about everything she ever said. (For every
hour Johnson spent in Boswell's company, he must have spent a hundred with the
Thrales, so I consider her accounts more reliable.) Most of the book is taken
up with accounts of Johnson's conversations, things Boswell heard him say or
other people repeated to him. Johnson was a great talker, and since he was in
very bad health his entire life he had great trouble sleeping and so he would
happily stay up talking as late as anyone wanted to. Although testy and easily
put in a temper, he was a kind man and went to enormous trouble and expense to
help all kinds of people, most of whom had no claim on him. It was funny, in a
pathetic kind of way, to watch Boswell try to win arguments with Johnson in
absentia: Johnson was an abolitionist, while Boswell was enthusiastically
pro-slavery, and after being demolished by Johnson on the subject he wrote
about it and then added "nevertheless.." and brought out arguments he
hadn't dared voice when Johnson was present. I couldn't help laughing when
Boswell, who was an attorney by profession, and a thoroughly incompetent one --
he lost every case he ever argued -- printed in the book a court brief that
Johnson had helped him write, and then said he had showed it to a friend and
called it an example of that friend's "great perspicacity" that he
could point out exactly which parts were Johnson's. (As if it took any skill to
tell Boswell's writing apart from Johnson's!) I liked the edition -- not only was
it well-bound and easy to read, it included a lot of very interesting
marginalia. Mrs. Thrale didn't like Boswell, and the feeling was mutual, so
when Mrs. Thrale read the book she made a lot of acid comments in the margins,
all of which are reprinted in this edition. It's very handy for identifying
people: whenever Boswell tells a story and tactfully doesn't mention someone's
name, Mrs. Thrale notes "This was so-and-so." This is most
entertaining on the several occasions when Boswell recounts "a gentleman"
saying something really stupid and getting dressed down for it, and Mrs. Thrale
notes "This was Boswell himself." I can't tell you how much I love
this book. Probably the best biography ever written, and easily one of the most
entertaining books of any kind.
Catching
Fire -- Richard Wrangham
A
fascinating book about cooking and its effect on human evolution. The author
argues that the essential distinction between proto-humans and humans was not
so much mastering fire as using it to cook food. One stat that astonished me:
if you added up all the time in one day you spend chewing, it would probably
come to less than forty-five minutes. For a gorilla it would come to more than
six hours! Gorillas even have a ridge on the top of their skulls where their
colossal jaw muscles are anchored, whereas our jaw muscles only go as high as
our ears. Raw food needs so much more chewing that it puts limits on ape
behavior. Chimpanzees, for example, kill monkeys for meat, but they don't go on
hunts, and when chasing prey they give up after only a few minutes. That's
because, thermodynamically, chimps just can't afford to invest too much time in
pursuit because they need that time to chew and digest their meals. Digesting
raw food also takes much more energy -- the human digestive system, especially
the stomach and the large intestine, is proportionally much smaller than that
of other apes, because humans use fire to do a lot of the work that other apes
have to do in the stomach. Humans' mouths are also proportionally smaller -- chimpanzees
are about half the size of humans but we have the same sized mouth cavity, and
they can open their mouths far wider than we can. There's so much more! Some
anthropologists think the hair-standing-on-end phenomenon is less aimed at
making you seem bigger than at exposing as much skin as possible to the air for
cooling purposes, since fighting builds up immense body heat, which most
mammals are much less able to shed than we are. Cooking also seems to have
pushed humans to develop tribal behavior: no other apes are observed to share
food, ever, not even between mates. A terrific read. It's one of those books
where you keep thinking about it for months afterwards.
The
Nigger of the Narcissus -- Joseph Conrad
His
third or fourth novel. His original publishers changed the title but Conrad
later insisted on changing it back. Despite the awful title, it's generally
considered the best of his early works. It tells the story of the voyage of the
Narcissus from Bombay to London, and the bad effect on the ship of two sailors
who join at the last minute: Wait, a black West Indian who is dying of
tuberculosis, and a Cockney named Donkin, a sea-lawyer and a lazy coward. Wait
attempts to work, though it's too much for him; Donkin shams sick and avoids
work as much as possible. The crew sympathizes with Wait and they try to make
his voyage as easy as they can, although he's petulant and ungrateful. The
middle part of the book is taken up with the gripping story of a terrible storm
off the Cape of Good Hope, where the ship is laid on her beam-ends -- that is,
she's half-capsized, lying on her side with the tops of the masts almost in the
water. (This is drawn from a real incident in Conrad's sailing career.) The
crew want to cut the masts off at the deck, in hopes that when the masts fall
away the ship will right herself, but the Captain rules against it and the crew
has to ride out the storm clinging wherever they can. In the course of the
storm someone remembers that Wait must still be in the sick-bay, and at great
danger to themselves the crew forms a human chain to rescue him. Donkin,
despite his low standing among the crew, manages to fan their resentment
against the Captain's apparent heartlessness into a near-mutiny. The Captain
aborts the mutiny by issuing the orders that will right the ship and simply
acting as if there is no possibility he will be disobeyed. Conrad seems to be
contrasting the crew's humane feelings toward Wait with the Captain's
professional detachment, since the reader is left to consider that in the face
of the uncaring sea it was the Captain's cold calculation, not the crew's
humanity, that saved the ship and the crew. The Narcissus survives the storm
and sails home; Wait dies within sight of land. There's a very good preface on
the subject of writing and how this book was where Conrad started to think of
himself as an artist.
Ring
For Jeeves -- P.G. Wodehouse
The
only book where Jeeves appears without Bertie, I think because it was
originally written as a stage musical; in a musical comedy the hero must get
married at the end, and Wodehouse wanted Bertie to remain a bachelor. In this
book Jeeves is moonlighting as a valet to an earl named Bill while Bertie,
apparently worried about losing all his money to postwar taxes and Socialism, is
away at a school that teaches idle aristocrats how to work for a living. Bill,
like other earls after the war, is broke and weighed down by the expensive
upkeep of a huge unsellable white elephant of a family house. He also wants to
get married, but despite being a cheerful good-hearted friendly sort of fellow,
he can't get a job due to being a useless pea-brain. On Jeeves's suggestion he
becomes an unlicensed bookie, and does very well for a while until he stupidly
accepts a bet he doesn't have the resources to pay off, and when the bet wins
he and Jeeves have to flee the race course with the cheated bettor in hot
pursuit. They shake him off and hide their disguises in the house, and then
receive several house guests: Bill's fiancée; Bill's sister and brother-in-law;
a wealthy divorcée who is thinking about buying the house; and the divorcée's
suitor, who coincidentally is the same man Bill welshed on. Bill has to be
extra charming to the heiress while keeping the fiancée in good humor and
keeping the suitor from recognizing him, while the brother-in-law cheerfully
goes around pointing out every flaw in the house to all the guests. It's a
great piece of juggling. Jeeves sorts everything out and arranges a number of
happy endings before leaving to rejoin Bertie, who has been expelled from his
independence school for cheating. It was very funny.
The
Black Echo -- Michael Connelly
Kind
of a formulaic crime thriller: a homicide cop with a shadowy past and a
drinking problem digs deep into a murder case everyone else wants him to drop.
The story unfolds predictably. Reading it was like listening to a top-forty pop
song. You think to yourself, "Now we get the scene where the boss tells
the cop he's too much of a lone wolf... here comes the showdown with the partner
over how far to pursue the case... now it's time for the romantic interlude
with the all-business federal agent... oh, we're at the chase scene... here's
where the hero sets off after the bad guys by himself without waiting for
backup... aaaand now we hit the final checkbox where the federal agent was
behind it all." It wouldn't stand out in my mind as much as it does
if it weren't for the annoying foreword by another mystery writer named Burke,
whose books I haven't read, who first whines about the lack of respect crime
fiction gets generally and says, incorrectly, that college English departments
don't teach the works of James M. Cain; then he fatuously says that Connelly's
writing stands up to Cain's. I have to think Connelly didn't see the foreword before
the book went to press, or he would have vetoed it, since having your
pedestrian first novel compared to a once-in-a-generation master of tight prose
must be embarrassing. It stayed in my mind the whole way through the book: I
was constantly thinking things like, "You know, Cain would know that
having the narrator complain about how clichéd his situation is does not excuse
the writer for using a clichéd situation." Honestly I think Burke only
knows that Cain was a great writer because someone told him so.
*The
Deadly Sunshade -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
The
title was the best thing about this one. (The victim is found poisoned sitting
under a beach umbrella.) The victim's name is Newell and Dad was amazed no one
found the opportunity to say she was "deaf as a post". There's a
well-known war correspondent roaming around providing one-liners, but the main
background of the book is the (very dated) comic setup of the Cape women
rounding up rifles and learning to shoot in case of invasion (the book came out
in 1940.) Taylor plays this as straight comedy, taking it as absurd on the face
of it that women should try to learn to shoot or take part in war preparations.
There's a ridiculous scene when Asey is held at gunpoint by one of these
humorless women in a ransacked house, a scene that goes on and on -- Dad called
it "beyond farce" and wondered if it was padded to fill up a
contractual page count. Although Taylor obviously originally intended the
mystery to be a romantic-rivalry-gone-bad story, it soon goes off the rails and
turns into a plot about former rum-runners and crooked cops trying to retake
their former territory, with the murder's solution shoehorned in as a sort of
afterthought. I would have liked it more, but the whole "ha ha, look at
those silly women" thing put me off.
Step
Aside, Pops -- Kate Beaton
Her
second collection of webcomics, generally historical/literary/weird. A lot of
them were very funny. I really liked the series of comics where she created
back stories for Edward Gorey's oddball cover illustrations of Doubleday
paperbacks.
The
Sopping Thursday -- Edward Gorey
Grey-scale
illustrations of mundanity. It's a series of drawings of inconsequential events
on a very rainy day: a woman loses her umbrella, a man in a shop can't find an
umbrella he likes, a dog wanders in and out, a toddler briefly gets lost and is
found again. It's not really about anything but I liked the expressive quality
of the heavy rain.
*Wanderers
-- Knut Hamsun
In
the original Norwegian this was two novels, but the translation puts them
together in one binding. They could have been subtitled "Memoirs of an
Annoying Busybody". The narrator is a man named Pedersen who seems to be a
retired townsman; I'm not sure how old he is -- he's always complaining about
being too old but he's vigorous enough to do heavy manual labor. On what seems
like a whim he leaves his retirement cottage to go tramping around the country
looking for work at farmsteads; in his narration he makes a big point of how
it's important to keep his educated past a secret, but in fact he can't go an
hour without hinting about it to someone. He's a skilled worker, and by far the
best parts of the story are the passages describing the jobs he gets -- digging
wells, laying water pipes, felling timber. He gets taken on for several months
at a prosperous farmstead and becomes obsessed with the farmer's wife; he
creepily stalks her while giving himself airs on his high-mindedness. In the
second part (that is, in the sequel) he returns to the same farm after six
years away, and while doing useful labor around the property also makes a
dreadful pest of himself interfering in the family's affairs, which are none of
his business. I thought the narrator was a sketchy asshole and at least partly
to blame for the farm wife's suicide. I hated it.
The
New American Splendor Anthology -- Harvey Pekar
This
is a collection of self-published autobiographical comic books that Pekar wrote
and various people illustrated. I was impressed with the way Pekar was willing
to show himself at his worst -- short-tempered, irritable, needlessly
combative. He also managed to convey how his testiness was an outgrowth of his
chronic anxiety, without making it seem as though he was making excuses for
himself. He did descend into self-delusion a little bit: Pekar occasionally
appeared on David Letterman's TV show, and according to his own version he
talked rings around Letterman and got the audience cheering for him, so much so
that Letterman had to cut to commercial. I watched the old interviews online,
though, and it was clear that Letterman was a professional and Pekar an amateur
who thought he was cannier than he was, and Pekar really just came off looking
angry and egotistical. I don't know that I'd go out of my way to read any more
of his stuff, but I liked it.
The
American Spirit -- David McCullough
A
collection of speeches, mostly from commencement exercises. A common theme was
that it's essential to being a good citizen to be thoroughly educated in world
history and American history, and to this end you need to read as much as
possible. Naturally I couldn't agree more.
Smart
Baseball -- Keith Law
A
stat primer, mostly, concentrating on explaining the new metrics teams have
started using the last twenty years or so to measure baseball players' value.
He touches on the absurd head-in-the-sand attitude older sports writers have
taken towards the idea that the stats they grew up with aren't perfect, but
that's mined-out territory and in any case most of those writers have either
retired or been relegated to very minor jobs where no one pays attention to
them. The book is in three sections: the first is about relics that are still
used only because of inertia, from wholly useless stats like the save or the
pitcher win to useful-but-incomplete things like batting average and ERA. The
second section goes over the better modern replacements, such as OBP and the
various attempts at measuring fielding ability. (Law doesn't mention it but my
favorite among these is Bill James' replacement for the "error" stat,
what he calls the CIDM, for "clearly identifiable defensive
mistake".) The third section looks at where performance measurement is
going, based on the overwhelming amount of data teams can now capture with
Statcast, a system of networked cameras installed in every ball park a few years
ago that can measure every imaginable event that occurs on a ball field -- the
launch angle of the bat on every contact with the ball, the ball's velocity off
the bat correlated with the arc of the hitter's wrists, the exact number of
spins the ball makes after leaving the pitcher's hand, anything you can think
of. Of course the teams don't share any of that information so the writers are
all back on the outside again. A good book.
A
Red Death -- Walter Mosley
The
second Easy Rawlins novel, set in 1953. In the five years since the action of
the last novel, Easy has bought several apartment buildings, although he passes
himself off as the janitor and lets everyone believe the buildings are owned by
some anonymous realtor downtown. But as the novel begins he is threatened by
the IRS, the problem being that he can't account for how he came to own the
buildings in the first place because the money he bought the first one with was
stolen. An FBI agent intervenes and offers to get Easy out of tax trouble in
return for digging up dirt on a Jewish Communist organizer working in Los
Angeles. Easy reluctantly takes the deal and feels worse and worse about it
when he finds that the Communist organizer is a European refugee and a
thoroughly good man, friendly, tireless, and committed to the relief of the
poor. In fact the Communist is the only character in the book who isn't hiding
anything, and most of the action involves Easy turning up secrets -- who ratted
him out to the IRS, why the IRS agent is pushing back against the FBI, what the
FBI agent is really looking for. The ending was sad but I liked the way the
book was put together.
The
Riddle of the Compass -- Amir D. Aczel
Disappointing.
The book barely makes it to 160 pages even with the help of large print and
extra-wide margins, and even then half of the text is just filler. It read like
a term paper where the student knows they didn't do enough research. There's
not really much information about compasses, either.
Mad
Enchantment -- Ross King
A
story about the last fifteen years or so of Monet's life and his artistic
renaissance. I don't know of any other great painter who had a similar career
path: as a young man Monet's work was derided by the establishment, but he
lived to see it gain acceptance and then admiration from both the critics and
the public, and became rich, famous, and hailed as a genius... and then he
reinvented himself at age seventy, moving in an entirely different direction
and producing wholly new works of great depth, power, and originality. In the
early years of the 20th century Monet went through a period of deep depression:
his wife and oldest son died and he developed cataracts that led to years of
near-blindness. He recovered his sight thanks to several operations and big
contemporary advances in eyeglass technology, and when he could paint again he
produced some of his best work, grand-scale paintings of the water lilies in
his pond and studies of the willows around his Japanese-style footbridge,
wonderfully exuberant riots of color. Monet thought the quality of light was so
important and evanescent that he would set up outside with as many as six
canvases, working on one as long as the light was right, then switching to
another and not going back to the first until the same time the next day.
Monet's house was full of paintings by his favorite artists like Matisse and
Gauguin. When he thought his own work wasn't going well, Monet would go around
his house and cover up their paintings because looking at them made him feel
incompetent; that story really endeared him to me. The book is also a good
picture of his long friendship with Clemenceau and his own ideas about his
place in history. I did think the writer gave too much space to the endless arguments
about the cost and design of the state-funded Monet museum, which took away
from the second half of the book a little bit, but overall it was very good.
Emergence
-- Steven Johnson
A
very good book about emergent behavior, that is, properties of a system that
only become apparent when the system becomes large enough. For example, if you
only observed one ant, or a hundred ants, you would never predict the colossal
feats of organization that appear in very large colonies of ants. One such feat:
an ant colony generally has a garbage pile, which is unerringly located as far
away as possible from the food storage, and also a place where they dump the
bodies of dead ants, which is as far away as possible from both the food
storage and the garbage pile. But there's no boss ant! Ants don't have a
directing intelligence -- the queen's only function is to reproduce. The
complexity of the ants' arrangements is an emergent property of the simple
rules each ant follows independently of all the others. Human cities display
the same phenomenon, even independent of imposed zoning regulations. For
example, certain parts of the city spontaneously organize themselves into
districts: the way all the theaters cluster in the same two blocks in Boston,
or the way all the diamond merchants use the same few blocks of Amsterdam.
Consciousness appears to be an emergent property of the human brain, which is
why people think it's possible that consciousness might also emerge in other
entities, such as a sufficiently complex machine. I enjoyed it.
The
King -- Donald Barthelme
The
only one of his novels I've really liked. It's an absurd story about what World
War II might have been like if Arthur and all his knights had lived into the
twentieth century and were still in charge. There are really funny scenes with
Guinevere and her ladies listening to Lord Haw-Haw attacking them on the radio,
and Arthur and Gawain talking to each other about what Winston's going to say
in Parliament about their latest offensive. At the same time, several knights
have the traditional strange visions and receive eerie visitors bearing arcane
messages, which when they're all assembled at the Round Table turn out to come
together to form plans on building an atomic bomb. Arthur decides that such a weapon
can't coexist with knightly honor and destroys the plans. It was a good story.
The
Old Reliable -- P.G. Wodehouse
A
Hollywood novel, and a story where ill-treated poor relations give their snooty
rich relatives their comeuppance, two of Wodehouse's favorite themes. The hero
is a woman called Bill ("Bill" being Wodehouse's favorite name for a
down-to-earth person; nearly all of his heroes are named Bill or Sally.) Bill
is a writer recently fired in a pointless studio shakeup, and she has to go to
work for her sister Adela, a former silent film star and domestic tyrant,
ghost-writing Adela's memoirs in return for room and board. There are great
scenes where the seething Bill has to do rewrites when Adela can't decide
whether to say she personally stole the important plans during World War I or
she was the romantic inspiration for a hero who did the actual stealing.
Luckily Bill has distractions: helping her also-fired studio buddy court her
niece; commiserating with her fellow poor relation Smedley, Adela's
brother-in-law; and hob-nobbing with the butler, an Englishman whom she happens
to know is a retired safe-cracker (she was on the jury that convicted him.) The
McGuffin is the scorching-hot diary of a late Hollywood bombshell, full of the
sort of names and details that make a best-selling tell-all memoir; everyone is
convinced it's hidden in the house Adela has recently bought, and the tangle of
alliances and betrayals as everyone connives to get hold of the diary form the
bulk of the story. I liked it a lot.
The
Gods Drink Whiskey -- Stephen Asma
A
pretty good book about Buddhism in Cambodia and Thailand; the author manages to
avoid poverty tourism, for which I was thankful. Most Buddhists in Indochina
practice Theravada Buddhism, as distinct from the Mahayana Buddhism practiced
in central Asia or the Zen Buddhism practiced in Japan. The American idea of
Buddhism is generally tied up with Zen because of the strong influence here of
Japanese pop culture, but traditions of Buddhism vary widely. Both the Thai and
Cambodian governments have made periodic attempts to suppress Buddhism, because
the monks carry a great deal of moral weight with the people; Cambodia actually
passed laws against giving charity, because Buddhist monks own nothing and get
their food by begging. In Okinawa I met an ancient Buddhist priest who had
spent some time teaching in America in the sixties, but who eventually decided
that the spirit of America isn't compatible with Buddhism. American
spirituality is grounded on the Judeo-Christian idea of eternity, and can't
find common ground with the essential Buddhist idea of impermanence. The Buddha
himself said that his disciples should treat his teachings like a raft: you use
a raft to get across a river that's in your way, but once you're across the
river, you don't lash the raft to your back and carry it with you -- you leave
it behind and continue your journey. I liked it.
The
Crazy Kill -- Chester Himes
Another
of Himes's novels set in 1950s Harlem. The ferociously angry detectives, Grave
Digger and Coffin Ed -- the only black detectives in their openly racist
precinct -- investigate a very strange crime scene: a tenement "rent
party" where a street preacher falls out of a fourth-floor window, lands
in a pile of bread boxes on the street, and returns to the party unhurt; the
host gets a phone call telling her there's a dead body under her window and
everyone laughs it off, until someone looks and there actually is a dead body
there, a man who's been stabbed, and who is lying in the same place the
preacher fell. It doesn't help that the preacher, who is prone to trances,
starts accusing people of both pushing him out the window and killing the man
in the street, saying he knows because it was revealed to him in a vision.
Digger and Ed follow the trails of jealousy and gambling debts to the killer;
their technique is basically to spread the police brutality around with a big
shovel, sometimes to make people talk, sometimes just because they don't like
someone's attitude. It was a good read.
*Henry
Esmond -- William Makepeace Thackeray
I
read this because Raymond Chandler wrote in an essay that "No one will
ever write a better historical novel than Henry Esmond." I could go into a
lot of detail but suffice it to say that Chandler was wrong. It's a tedious
book about an unlikeable boy in Queen Anne's England who grows up to be a
soldier and would-be writer, and spends a lot of asides attacking the character
of the Duke of Marlborough (because Thackeray thought that Marlborough had been
mean to Thackeray's great-great-great-great-uncle) in between taking shots at
Catholicism. It's as exciting as it sounds. There are ludicrous Mary-Sue scenes
where the hero wittily crushes Jonathan Swift, who sputters in helpless
confusion, and I practically sprained my eyes from rolling them so much. It was
also off-putting that the hero, as a teenager, falls in love with his
eight-years-younger step-sister (who is also his cousin) and spends the whole
novel pining after her, until suddenly abandoning her and marrying his
step-mother four pages before the end. It clearly didn't hold Dad's interest,
as his notes get sparser as the book goes on, ending with the remark
"Obviously I stopped taking notes halfway through." I wouldn't
recommend it.
The
Actor's Nightmare -- Christopher Durang
A
dream-landscape play, where the main character is a man having the
"actor's nightmare", a dream where you're an actor about to go on
stage, but you haven't rehearsed and don't know your lines. Everyone involved
with the theater has had this dream; I've had it myself. The hero finds himself
backstage and is told that the actor for whom he is the understudy has broken
his legs and he must go on in his place; not only has he not rehearsed, he
doesn't remember being cast in a play at all and is pretty sure he's an
accountant. It's only after being pushed on stage and trying his best to get on
with the play -- which morphs from Noel Coward to Samuel Beckett to Shakespeare
-- that he realizes he's dreaming; as the play becomes A Man For All Seasons
and he comes to the beheading scene, he decides that "dying" on stage
in the dream will lead to waking up, so he goes to the headsman's block and the
lights go out just as the axe comes down. The stage directions indicate that
the hero should continue to lie motionless on the stage during the curtain
calls. I liked it but I bet I'd find it pretty disturbing on stage.
*The
Perennial Boarder -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo story, written during the run-up to the war -- the plot involves Asey
getting delayed by having to stop for columns of troop trucks, and the draft is
mentioned several times. Asey, delivering some buckets of fresh clams, finds a
dead body sitting in a telephone booth in the lobby of a boarding house, and is
nonplussed when the body soon disappears -- it turns out that (for no reason
ever explained) the phone booth has a sliding panel. Asey's investigation is
slowed by the boarding house owner trying to cover everything up for fear of
bad publicity. At one point Asey says he wouldn't trust someone on a
"six-lane highway" -- Dad notes this was hyperbole since there
weren't any six-lane highways in America in 1941. There's an extended
digression with a chauffeur (Dad called it a "set-piece"); the
chauffeur is a stage-Irishman ("The cops are all corrupt -- see? Me
brother's a cop -- see?") and since he drops out of the book after his
comic monologue I got the feeling Taylor had written that scene for something
else but hadn't used it and didn't want it to go to waste so she stuck it in
here. I was interested to see the great lengths Doc Cummings goes to in order
to imply a man is gay without actually saying so; I wouldn't have thought even
that would be acceptable to publish in the forties.
Enter
the Saint -- Leslie Charteris
A
collection of three early novellas about Charteris's recurring character,
"the Saint", a British gentleman-adventurer who's decided --
apparently just for the fun of it -- to devote his intelligence and money to
fighting crime. His usual plan is to steal all of a bad guy's money and give it
to charity, after deducting a percentage for expenses. These three are fairly
predictable boiler-plate pulp thrillers; Charteris even apologizes for them in
the foreword, saying that he wouldn't have reprinted them if it weren't for the
demands from completists. (At that, there were even earlier Saint stories he
said he was too embarrassed to reprint.) I'm told the series got much better
later on, so I'll probably find some later books and see how I like those.
Sister
Mary Ignatius Explains It All For You -- Christopher Durang
I
was a kid when this came out but I remember the big noise it made. It's an
absurdist comedy about a confrontation between an elderly nun and some of her
former students, who have returned to accuse her of terrifying and abusing them
as children. Durang, a former Catholic, is clearly writing from angry memories.
The nun I thnk would be diffcult to act on stage; the unruffled way she
explains some of the more bizarre Church dogmas as if they made perfect sense
echoes the way she faces her angry former students and calmly explains that
they're mistaken, all her students loved her. That all builds up to the climax
where, having made sure one of the students has been to confession that day, she
shoots him, serenely explaining that she has sent him to Heaven. My parents
both hated this play, though they didn't join the effort to have it banned in
Boston. I remember Dad -- who always said the Globe was anti-Catholic --
complained to the paper about the way the reviews were written.
Hero
of the Empire -- Candice Millard
A
very good, very entertaining book about Winston Churchill's experience in the
Boer War, the first low point in a century full of them. Churchill was in his
mid-twenties and had already left the Army because he couldn't bear being under
orders; when war broke out in South Africa, he got himself sent there as a war
correspondent. The Boer War was England's most nakedly imperialistic land grab,
which is really saying something, and I would have felt more sympathy for the
Boers resisting England's totally unjust invasion, except that the Boers
themselves were living on land they had brutally stolen from the Sang and Khoi
Khoi people, who had lived there for tens of thousands of years, and about whom
they cared precisely nothing. Churchill wasn't the sort to sit and wait for a
story to come to him, and he traveled around with Army detachments as much as
he could, finally getting caught in a Boer ambush on a troop train. Churchill
was in a bad spot after getting captured, since he had committed very visible
war crimes: he was carrying a gun and wearing a British Army jacket -- both
forbidden to noncombatants -- and he took an active part in the fire-fight,
including giving orders to British soldiers. The Boers would have been
justified in just shooting him out of hand, and Churchill himself admitted that
had a Boer correspondent done the same things the British would have killed
him. Things are generally more civilized in the early days of a war, though,
and Churchill was sent to a prison camp, where, with his usual colossal
self-importance, he invited himself into a group planning an escape; he
insisted on pushing up the escape's timetable, and fouled the operation up due
to his own arrogant pig-headedness, ending up with the guards clamping down
with Churchill on the outside of the wall and everyone else inside. That left
everyone in a bad way: the other prisoners were now under much heavier guard,
and Churchill was alone, far from friendly ground, with a price on his head and
no resources -- he didn't even speak the language. With a stunning combination
of chutzpah and luck he managed to cover a lot of ground by clinging to the
sides of trains in the dark and dropping off before daylight, and with help
from British laborers, who hid him in mine shafts during the day, he crossed
hundreds of miles to reach British-held territory unharmed. The story of his
escape was a nine-day wonder and launched his career in politics, even while
the war grew more and more brutal, ending with the British committing
wide-scale reprisals among the Boer civilians and establishing the first
concentration camps; British propaganda has spent a hundred years avoiding the
word genocide, but that's what it was. A terrific read, a real
page-turner.
Come
as You Are -- Emily Nagoski
A
book about female sexuality that a feminist friend of mine recommended I read.
It was well-organized and well-written; I thought it got a little repetitive in
its constant reminding the reader that "everything about you is
normal", but I guess that's a point that needs a lot of driving home. The
author is a therapist, and she generally finds that her clients have had almost
no sexual education whatever -- most of them seem to have gotten the same
three-minute "This part goes there, and that's where babies come from,
let's move on" school lecture as I did, and never did any research beyond
that. Generally they accepted some half-understood paradigm tacitly expressed
by the media or their partners, and in any place where their own real-life
makeup didn't match the paradigm they thought there must be something wrong
with them, which was simultaneously a failure and a cause for shame. That's not
a formula for a fulfilling life, never mind a sex life, and I'm glad people
like the author exist.
Tangled
Vines -- Frances Dinkelspiel
A
true-crime story about a con man named Anderson who ran the equivalent of a
Ponzi scheme with wine. Apparently if you know even a little about wine it's
easy to pose as an expert, and Anderson sold his customers on storing their
valuable wine collections in his specialized facility, which was supposedly
temperature-controlled and humidity-controlled and all kinds of things, but
which was actually way more basic than that, and even then Anderson was
secretly selling the wine to pay the rent. When customers wanted access to any
of they wine they'd stored with him, Anderson would give them someone else's
wine, or stall them off, or (if he was feeling really brazen that day) just
give them bottles of much cheaper wine and insist that's what they stored with
him in the first place. Juggling the costs didn't ket him keep up the rent, so
without telling any of his customers he moved everything to a rented locker in
a massive commercial wine warehouse in Vallejo, a former Naval base. Unable to
cope with the mounting threats and lawsuits, Anderson decided to burn his
inventory so no one could prove what he'd stolen. Either through malice or
incompetence, no one's sure, the fire he set spread beyond his storage locker
and eventually engulfed the entire warehouse, destroying about four and a half
million bottles of wine (even the bottles that didn't shatter or explode had
their contents cooked by the intense heat.) Something like ninety Napa Valley
vintners stored their wines there; not only were whole years' vintages lost
entirely, many vintners also stored cases of older vintages going back decades
-- the whole history of a vineyard gone overnight. As if that weren't bad
enough, the insurance companies argued that wine in a storehouse is technically
"in transit", so they wouldn't pay out any insurance. Anderson went
to prison, but that didn't help the dozens of smaller vintners who couldn't
withstand the loss and had to close, ending generations of family businesses. A
sad story but really well-written. I liked it.
The
Other Statue -- Edward Gorey
Sort
of what you might get if an alien tried to assemble a murder mystery out of
pieces of other murder mysteries, without knowing what makes a murder mystery
work. It's a funny story about a cocktail party at Backwater Hall, where a
windstorm blows a statue off the roof, killing Lord Wherewithal; in the
confusion the priceless statue of the Lisping Elbow goes missing. Who did it?
The characters cluster confusedly and blink at one another in gentle
bewilderment, rather like a crowd of flamingoes in Edwardian overcoats. It's
the lovely line art that makes it all work, of course.
Sadness
-- Donald Barthelme
A
collection of surrealist short stories. I liked some better than others. The
one that stays with me is a weird piece about Paul Klee, who was (in real life)
assigned the odd job of painting camouflage on war planes during World War I.
In the story he misplaces a plane and can't find it again because he's
camouflaged it so well, and the story follows him trying to track down the
plane while being trailed by a pair of strangely triumphant secret police
agents. Most of the others left no impression on me, to be honest.
The
Shores of Tripoli -- James L. Haley
A
naval-adventure story, probably dealing with the campaign against the Barbary
States, but so clumsily written I stopped reading after thirty pages so who
knows.
The
Genesee Diary -- Henri J.M. Nouwen
In
1974 Nouwen spent seven or eight months living in a Trappist monastery in
upstate New York. This was a special privilege just for him -- ordinarily no
one who wasn't considering becoming a monk would be allowed to live among them.
Nouwen was not called to a contemplative life but he found the experience good
for him, especially the weekly spiritual-direction sessions he had with with
the abbott, a man he found profoundly impressive, where they discussed matters
of faith and how to live a Christian life. The Trappists observe very strict
rules, including maintaining long periods of silence, even while working. They
get up for prayer at two AM and then spend most of the morning baking;
initially Nouwen's job was to sift through the raisins for the raisin bread, looking
for grit and pebbles, because at first he couldn't follow the monks' gestures
well enough to bake. He mentions how one day, when everyone was at lunch, a
monk came in to the hall and, having knocked on the table for attention, made a
few signs; five or six monks got up and went out with him, and Nouwen was later
taken aback to find out that there had been a fire and the monk was calling the
fire brigade to help him put it out. In the afternoons he waded into the local
stream to pull out rocks for the stone chapel the monks were building that
year. The diary does such a good job of discussing dedicated contemplation and
the spiritual life in general that the Trappists now give it to prospective
monks to read before they come to the monastery. I liked it.
The
48 Laws of Power -- Robert Greene
I
read this because the suave and scheming villain in "Luke Cage"
mentions it as a book he relies on. It's appropriate because that villain turns
out to be a dope who wrecks all his own schemes through stupid over-confidence.
It's basically an MRA manual, a guide to winning meaningless victories in a
social game no one but you is playing. Not worth reading.
A
Wonder-Book for Girls and Boys -- Nathaniel Hawthorne
A
collection of classical myths re-told to make them acceptable for 19th-century
New England; the gods are portrayed simply as mysterious strangers and there's
no reference to Greek beliefs at all. Plus of course all hints of sex are
banished, although there's plenty of killing. At that they're not bad, although
since I'm so familiar with the sources my impression of these retellings may be
colored by them. The stories are supposed to be told by a New England college
student to a group of unbearably cutesy children, with names such as Cowslip
and Squash-Blossom, whom I believe would have sickened me even when I was
seven, but you can hold your nose through those parts.
Tanglewood
Tales -- Nathaniel Hawthorne
This
is a continuation of the Wonder-Book, with more bowdlerized stories from the
Greek myths, but without the framing-stories of the disgustingly twee children,
thank God. The stories aren't bad.
God
and Golem, Inc. -- Norbert Wiener
A
short book from fifty years ago about science and religion. It has the feel of
having been a lecture originally. One of his central ideas is that since
machines can learn and reproduce, and humanity unquestionably created machines,
we may stand in the same relation to machines as God does to us (Wiener was an
atheist but interested in the existence of creator-worship as an observed
fact.) Wiener correctly predicted that machines would learn to defeat humans at
even very complex games like chess and go, and although he was hesitant to
describe machines as "alive" ("after all a living being is
living in all its parts") he thought they might be usefully compared to
the legendary Golem, created by the rabbi of Prague, which could move and act
independently. How far does mimicry of life extend before it becomes
indistinguishable from actual life? Boston Dynamics has built a robot dog whose
behavior doesn't differ from that of a real dog in any important way. I'd love
to know what Wiener would have had to say about that.
Doctor
Sally -- P.G. Wodehouse
This
was appalling. Wodehouse never left behind a lot of nineteenth-century
attitudes, and many of his characters pursue their love interests in ways that
I can only describe as stalking, which Wodehouse obviously thought was
endearing; but this is the first one I've read where the hero is an actual
rapist. The hero, Bill, is a wealthy layabout who falls in love at first sight
with Sally Smith, an M.D. He comes up with various schemes to win her
attention, from asking for golf lessons to pretending to be sick, but none of
them work because Sally doesn't like do-nothing idlers. Frustrated, Bill
finally corners Sally alone and grabs her. She fights him off and he briefly
feels ashamed of himself, but he gets over it immediately and manages to
convince Sally that he intends to get a job, whereupon she swoons at his feet.
I was disgusted. If this had been the first Wodehouse I'd read, I would never
have read another.
Hermit
in Paris -- Italo Calvino
A
posthumous collection of letters and autobiographical essays; the majority of
the book is a long series of letters he wrote to his publisher in France during
the six months he spent in America on a grant. (By his own account he seems to
have spent most of his time in the US chasing women.) I hadn't known he was
born in Cuba; his parents were botanists and taught in universities there and
in South America. His mother, expecting him to grow up in the New World, gave
him his unusual first name to remind him of his heritage; but since he wound up
growing up in Italy after all, he was always uncomfortable about his name,
saying it sounded "belligerently nationalistic". An anti-fascist,
Calvino went to the University of Turin to avoid the Italian Army, and
eventually joined the Garibaldi Brigades, fighting as a guerrilla against the
Nazis until the war ended. He left the Communist Party after the Soviet
invasion of Hungary, though he kept that odd Communist habit of talking about
world leaders as though he knew them all personally and perfectly understood
all their strategies. It was pretty interesting.
Falstaff
-- Robert Nye
This
wasn't very good. It purports to be the memoirs of Falstaff's servant, and a
"secret history" of the Battle of Agincourt, and it presents a
picture of Falstaff and the narrator raunching it up Elizabethan style and
cheating and tricking their friends and each other. It goes on well into the
reign of Henry the Sixth, with Falstaff living on to age eighty, twenty or
thirty years later than he's shown dying in Shakespeare. That may have been
explained away as a trick Falstaff was playing on Nell Quickly, but if it was I
missed it, since I could never get into the story and skimmed for a bit before
abandoning it altogether a hundred pages in.
The
Author's Farce -- Henry Fielding
His
first successful play. He had written earlier ones that were all flops; I don't
know if any of them survive. It's a three-act comedy, featuring an unsuccessful
playwright named Harry Luckless, who is constantly rejected by greedy and
stupid theater-managers -- all based on real managers of the day such as Colley
Cibber and his son. At the same time Luckless is trying to marry for money and
making a fool of himself. He manages to get his play put on at an independent
theater (based on the Little Haymarket, where this play was staged) and the
third act is mostly a play-within-a-play as we see Luckless's comedy performed:
the Goddess of Nonsense chooses a husband from among six dunces (also based on
real people Fielding felt like sticking it to.) A Constable appears to arrest
Luckless for "abusing Nonsense" but a character in the play talks him
into letting it continue, and the play and the real world get confused, with
Luckless suddenly inheriting the throne of a far Eastern sultanate and marrying
his landlady. There's a metafictional epilogue where a crowd of poets sit
around arguing about how they would have ended the play. It's very funny,
although it helps a lot to be up on your Augustan literary history, so you know
who Fielding was crapping on and why. I liked it.
Grandfather's
Chair -- Nathaniel Hawthorne
A
children's history of New England, actually quite readable if you glide lightly
over the saccharine framing-scenes of the children pleading with Grandfather
for a story. It gives a lot more attention to pre-Revolutionary Massachusetts
than most histories do, which is unsurprising in Hawthorne but a welcome
change. There's a lively account of William Phips and his sunken treasure,
ending with a picture of the ennobled Sir William sitting in the State House
giving a dinner for all his old seafaring friends. I suppose Hawthorne got his
details out of Cotton Mather's suck-up biography, since there's no mention of
the escapades that made Samuel Eliot Morison refer to Phips and his men as a
"crew of cut-throats who practiced every known form of vice."
White
Butterfly -- Walter Mosley
The
third Easy Rawlins novel. We've jumped ahead now to 1956 and Easy is married
with a baby daughter, living in a house with them and his older adopted son.
He's approached by the LAPD, who strong-arm him into investigating the murders
of four LA women. Easy is pissed about it because the first three victims were
black, and the cops are only investigating now because the fourth victim is a
white woman killed in a black neighborhood. At the same time he's having
trouble with his wife, who wants to be let in on what Easy does for a living.
Easy solves the murders despite pressure from the fourth victim's parents, who
don't want it known that their daughter had a child with a black man. Easy's
domestic problems grated on me, kind of. It bugged me that his wife openly
tells him that she married him only because she wanted a baby, and it bugged me
that they've been married for two years and she's only now decided she wants to
know where his money comes from. What really got to me, though, was an exchange
during an argument, when Easy says he's always been good to her and she snaps
back that he'd better be, because "you ever raise your hand to me or my
child I'll walk out that door after I shoot you dead" -- and I thought,
"But there are two children in that family." I disliked the
wife not because she left Easy for another man and took the baby, but because
she didn't take the older boy; it made me think about what life must have been
like for the boy with her in the house. It put a sour cast on the book for me.
A
Slip of the Keyboard -- Terry Pratchett
A
collection of non-fiction articles from his later years, many of them dealing
with his early-onset Alzheimer's and his decision to end his life. There are
several right-to-die advocacy articles and a long piece about the
assisted-suicide facility in Switzerland, which was made into a BBC documentary
called "Choosing to Die". As it turned out Pratchett died naturally
in his sleep, or at least that's what his family says, so he didn't go to
Switzerland after all. I found the book pretty depressing.
Exit
Strategy -- Steve Hamilton
This
is a sequel to his earlier book about hitman-in-training Nick Mason, and
although it was exciting and suspenseful, with great fight scenes, it
disappointed me. In this one Nick decides to get himself free of Darius Cole,
forging a temporary alliance with the cop Sandoval and a federal agent. Cole,
who's been presented all along as an all-powerful puppet master, is suddenly
and jarringly revealed in the last four pages to be only a tool in the hands of
the EVEN MORE all-powerful puppet masters who have been BEHIND EVERYTHING ALL
ALONG!, a trope that was dumb the first time it was used back in caveman
story-telling times and hasn't improved since. The stupid ending ruined the
whole book for me. The last page clearly sets up a series of sequels which I
will not be reading.
Foreign
Gods, Inc. -- Okey Ndibe
An
awful, nasty novel. The anti-hero is Ike (pronounced ee-kay), who has a
dead-end job and life in New York. Ike came from Nigeria to study finance at
Amherst College, where he got top grades but after graduation took the first of
many wrong steps by abandoning an intelligent, interesting woman (right in the
middle of a conversation about Nigerian literature!) to pursue a vain American
in hopes of marrying her for a green card. His wife never appears in the novel
-- they divorced before the story begins -- but to hear him tell it the
marriage failed because she was selfish and demanding. I don't think we can
rely much on his version of events, though, so who knows. I kept expecting the
story to turn so I would start liking Ike, but I just disliked him more and
more as it went on. He did get a green card but was turned down at a job
interview at a finance company because his accent was too strong; he found this
crushing and never applied anywhere else, instead working as a taxi driver and
gambling away all his money. As the novel opens he's dead broke, months behind
on his rent and all his bills. He decides to act on a plan he's been contemplating
for some time: to return to his home village and steal the war-god Ngene, a
wooden idol, and bring it back to New York, where he will sell it to a gallery
that specializes in selling foreign gods to rich Americans. He borrows money
from friends and maxes out a credit card to pay for the trip. He arrives to
find a family feud in progress, his mother and sister -- who have become
followers of a recently-arrived Christian preacher -- having turned against
Ike's uncle and grandmother, who have remained faithful to Ngene. Ike visits
the preacher and finds him an ignorant fool who is only interested in money;
Ike insults him and leaves, going to see his uncle despite his mother's
forbidding it. His uncle is the priest of Ngene, and he and his fellow traditionalists
welcome Ike and treat him kindly; his uncle has always believed that Ngene will
choose Ike to be the next priest, and he warns Ike that there's no choice about
it: Ngene chooses you and that's that. Despite this, Ike goes ahead with his
plan to steal Ngene, even though he realizes all the consequences: not only is
taking the village's god away inherently immoral and wrong, Ike knows the
preacher will certainly be blamed when the idol vanishes, and if his uncle
doesn't die of the shock he will probably kill the preacher and get executed
for it. Ignoring all of this, Ike steals the god and takes it to New York,
where the owner of the gallery ridicules it and won't pay the huge sums Ike had
fantasized about. So Ike ends up where he began, only worse -- he owes still
more money that he can't pay; he's caused panic and violence in his home
village, which he hears about from his sister, who blames him for it; and the
looming presence of Ngene -- whom he sees in every corner even with the lights
off -- tells him that he has unwillingly become Ngene's chief priest. The novel
ends with him sitting in his dark apartment rocking back and forth in horror. I
hated it. If I could give back having read it, I would.
The
Zen of Fish -- Trevor Corson
A
very good book despite the dumb title. (It's been reissued as The Story of
Sushi, probably a sign of personnel turnover at the publisher.) It follows
the story of a bunch of Californians learning to make sushi in a months-long
class at a restaurant in Hermosa Beach. That's a very non-traditional way to
learn, but nothing about sushi in America is "traditional" anyway;
sushi chefs here are largely self-taught Japanese men who didn't have the time,
money, or inclination to go through the expensive and years-long process of
becoming a sushi chef in Japan. Sushi is made a little differently here because
of our different eating habits (the author does descend occasionally into
self-righteous purist nonsense -- it's not some huge insult to the chef if you
eat the ginger slices as an appetizer rather than as a palate-cleanser between
courses!) For one thing, American diners want to eat what they feel like
instead of just taking what the chef decides to give you. For another, the rice
in the nigiri has to be packed a little tighter in the US, because Americans
tend to dip the rice in soy sauce, which would make a more traditional
loosely-packed nigiri fall apart. The book does a good job of laying out the
whole history of sushi, including the accidental discovery of soy sauce when
someone decided to taste the brown ooze that seeped out of fermenting tofu, and
the gradual refinements of technique. There are lots of different kinds of
sushi but the mental picture everyone has of it -- the rice-and-fish nigiri and
the rice, fish, vegetable, and seaweed rolls -- is actually Tokyo-style sushi,
which became the style of sushi after the widespread destruction in
Japan in World War II, because it can be made without a kitchen. There's also a
great deal of fascinating information about the structure of fish muscles and
what part of the fish makes the best sashimi. I already knew that the
"wasabi" served in American restaurants is actually a mixture of hot
mustard and horseradish with food coloring in it, but I was interested to learn
that throughout most of sushi's history mustard was the preferred condiment:
not only is wasabi hard to grow and expensive, but the leaves of the wasabi
plant look a lot like the design on the crest of the Imperial family, so it
would be disrespectful for common people to eat it. Good book.
*The
Willowdale Handcar -- Edward Gorey
An
illustrated story about three friends who find a handcar on a railroad siding,
and for no particular reason decide to ride away on it. They're constantly on
the periphery of an unexplained second story -- as they roll along the tracks
they encounter fleeing wives, skulking figures who appear to be burying bodies,
wrecked and abandoned cars, all the detritus of an Edwardian murder mystery;
but they regard it all with detached indifference. I thought it was great.
*The
Six Iron Spiders -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo mystery, written during the war. Asey, who is too old to go back into
the Navy, is now manufacturing tanks with his old boss and returns to Wellfleet
for a long weekend. He misses a connection and has to hitchhike sixty miles
from the airport (Dad spent some time trying to figure out what airport that
could have been, and decided it was probably Fall River.) Naturally he trips
over a murder first thing. (A state cop even says to him "This sort of
thing doesn't happen when you're away.") The victim was bashed in the head
with a "spider", that being an old-fashioned cast-iron skillet with
legs to prop it above a fire, hence the name. Everyone and his brother seems to
have acquired an iron spider lately, so there's the usual business of giving
everyone a motive until Taylor decides which are the red herrings and which is
the killer. A lot of the local color involves what Dad called the
"maddening officiousness" of the civilian officials (such as the
air-raid warden) which Dad says is very true to life. At one point the killer
tricks Asey into pursuing him down a road where he's sure to be stopped by a
"spotter" (a 4F civilian on the lookout for enemy landings) and
detained. Asey winds up using the doctor's car because it's the only one on the
Cape that has four good tires (due to wartime rationing.)
Negroes
and the Gun -- Nicholas Johnson
A
history of black people's use of guns in resistance to white violence through
American history. It's written by an NRA supporter so there's some
fetishization of gun violence -- passages about "so-and-so many grains of
lead moving at such-and-such feet per second", that sort of thing. Of
course its ultimate argument is against gun control, resting on a set of
assumptions that form the core of justification for anti-gun-control
philosophy: that murderers are inherently different from other people (the
"born bad" theory); that state power is never sufficient to prevent
illegal traffic of guns; that the American state is not inherently hostile to
non-whites; that state power can never sufficiently protect ordinary people
from born-bad people. As with all advocacy literature, the author is concerned
to present his own side as the calm, rational antidote to the emotional
hysteria of the other side, using such phrasing as "a surface
interpretation might suggest...but a closer investigation reveals..."
where "surface" and "closer" are just semantic wallpaper to
cover up that all he's really saying is "their side says...but my side
says..." The book has nothing new to say about the gun debate, but it does
a better job as a work of history, going over a couple hundred years of blacks
standing up to whites, and the distinction between self-defense and political
violence. I might support legislation saying that only non-white people could
own guns. Worth trying!
Born
to Kvetch -- Michael Wex
An
unexpectedly terrific book all about Yiddish and its cultural context. I knew
that kvetch means to moan or complain; I didn't know that it literally
means "to exert effort" or "to strain", specifically the
kind of straining you do when you need more fiber in your diet. The point is
that listening to someone kvetch is as much fun as listening to someone having
a difficult time on the toilet. The author's mother wouldn't let him watch the
Three Stooges -- not because of the violence but because a lot of their
dialogue is in Yiddish and it's extremely vulgar. (Actors often used Yiddish to
get around the Censorship Board.) A lot of Yiddish expressions are
circumlocutions or in-jokes appropriate to an oppressed minority. A common
Yiddish way of saying "bullshit" is nisht geshtoygen und nisht
gefloygen, literally "didn't climb and didn't fly" (referring to
Jesus: he didn't climb off the Cross into Heaven and he sure didn't fly there.)
Some are transliterated even now: a stock phrase of Jewish comedians --
"What am I, chopped liver?" meaning, How come you're treating me like
this? -- in the original is actually "What, am I a Christian now?" My
favorite part dealt with the famously long and involved Yiddish curses, which
have an underlying spirit of fun -- you might curse out someone who cut you off
in traffic, or even a friend who was getting on your nerves. For someone who'd
done something genuinely bad you wouldn't construct an elaborate curse, you'd
just say yemakh sh'moy, may his name be erased. I remember some of the
old ladies on my paper route saying that when they watched the news. An ideal
Yiddish curse is khazer-fisl, "like a pig's foot": it sounds
like a blessing until you get to the stinger at the end. (To be kosher an
animal must have cloven feet and chew its cud; a pig is unclean because it
doesn't chew its cud, but it does have cloven feet, so if you showed someone
only the pig's foot, they might think it was good to eat, until you showed them
the rest, and they realized they'd been had.) The book gives a terrific
example: "You should own a thousand houses, with a thousand rooms in each
house, and a thousand beds in each room, and every night you should sleep in a
different bed, in a different room, in a different house, and get up every
morning, and go down a different staircase, and get into a different car,
driven by a different chauffeur, who should drive you to a different doctor --
and he shouldn't know what's wrong with you either!" I loved it.
All
Shot Up -- Chester Himes
Another
of his 1950s novels about Harlem. He wrote them in France, having permanently
moved there to escape American racism; in fact they were initially published in
French, although I believe he wrote in English. This one finds the detectives
Grave Digger and Coffin Ed investigating an armed robbery that left several
bystanders dead; the object of the robbery was a payroll carried by a ward
boss, and the detectives are pretty sure the ward boss arranged the robbery
himself in order to steal the money. But they don't want to bring it against
him directly, both because they're reluctant to undermine a black politician
who supports Harlemites against the white establishment and because they
themselves often need the help of a powerful politician against their own white
superiors. So they have to work out a way of clearing everything up without
either bringing down the ward boss or letting him think he can stage fake
crimes with impunity. Good story.
Shadows
on the Koyukuk -- Sidney Huntington and Jim Rearden
A
really interesting book about growing up in beyond-rural Alaska back in the
teens and twenties. The author was the son of half-Athabascan parents, and the
family made its living by fishing for salmon in the summer and trapping furs in
the winter. I doubt Huntington could really have such vivid memories of things
that happened when he was three years old, especially considering that he wrote
the book in his seventies, but even if he remembered them more from being told
about them they're probably accurate. I'm sure he did have vivid memories of
his mother dying when he was five, and being left to take care of his younger
brother and sister by himself because his father was away up the river for
weeks and there were no neighbors. It's a good story, all about surviving in
the wilderness beyond the Koyukuk River, hunting for food and building their
own boats and dog sleds. There are harrowing episodes, such as the time he
almost died after falling through the ice while his sled went on without him --
luckily his sled dogs eventually noticed that the sled was too light and came
back to find him where he'd crawled out of the river. Or the year the ice jam
built up so high the spring flood washed their house and boat away (they found
the boat some miles downstream but they never did find any of the house.)
There's also interesting passages about Athabascan customs, such as the way
they speak in the third person when describing something they've accomplished,
so as not to seem like they're bragging -- so a man telling the story of how
he'd killed a bear with a spear, for example, would say "There was a young
man who went hunting bear..." Huntington occasionally participated in
old-fashioned bear hunts that I don't think would be legal now: hunters would
locate a bear's den and one would wait out front with a spear while others
would dig in through the roof of the den and make noise, so the bear would come
out; the angry bear would charge the first thing it saw, so the hunter out
front would brace the spear and let the bear charge on to it and impale itself,
a staggeringly dangerous way to hunt. Good reading.
The
House Spirit -- Kanoko Okamoto
An
excellent collection of short stories from the thirties; Okamoto was a famous
Buddhist scholar and poet who only turned to writing fiction in the last two or
three years of her life, so this collection represents a great deal of her
total output. They're very engaging, well-told stories about small facets of
ordinary life, many of them having to do with food. My favorite was
"Sushi", about a teenager working at her family's restaurant and
gradually hearing the life story of a regular customer, who as a child was
constantly sick and unable to eat anything except the sushi his mother
carefully made for him, so that for him sushi has become emblematic of love and
tenderness. They were very well written.
The
Gold Bat -- P.G. Wodehouse
Another
very early school story, with a main plot about the rugby team and a B-plot
about some jerks who smash up people's stuff when they're not around. Nothing
really memorable.
*Swann's
Way -- Marcel Proust
The
first volume of Remembrance of Things Past. Dad gave me this a long time
ago, when he bought a newer edition from that academic-overstock catalog he
subscribed to. This is the original C.K. Scott Moncrieff translation, not the
more recent updated one. I prefer it for a few reasons: first, Moncrieff knew
Proust and consulted with him both by letter and in person, a resource no other
translator can have. Second, Moncrieff was Proust's contemporary and must have
had a feel for the times that's impossible for a translator to have now. I
remember a review called the new translation "A Proust for the
twenty-first century!" I found that nonsensical since Proust didn't live
in the twenty-first century, and what we actually want is a Proust for the late
nineteenth and early twentieth century. The novel doesn't really have a plot,
being more a tone poem or a huge mosaic of imagery than a story, so the
author's choice of words is even more important than usual. People can go
overboard about that, though; take the opening sentence: Longtemps, je me
suis couché de bonne heure. Moncrieff translates it, I think unimprovably,
as "For a long time I used to go to bed early." I've read critics say
that since the temps element in the first word echoes the overall title
-- A la Recherche du Temps Perdu -- then "Time" must be the
first word in the English version, thus insisting on such awkward phrasings as
"Time was I went to bed early", which seem to me to sacrifice
elegance in English in a futile attempt to preserve elegance in French.
As
for the novel itself, I liked it, though I think if I'd read it twenty-five
years ago it would have bored me to death. I'm more willing now to follow along
a character with whom I don't sympathize. The unnamed narrator, who is
obviously meant to be Proust himself, though spiritually rather than literally
(it's not an autobiography), is a boy growing up in the countryside in France
just after the fall of Napoleon III, an only child and the youngest of a
numerous and well-off family, and suffering from some sort of emotional problem
that the nineteenth century could only diagnose as "nerves". He and
his parents often go for long walks in the evenings, choosing one path or the
other depending on the weather: either the "Guermantes Way" (a very
long woodsy path that passes the estate of the Guermantes family) or
"Swann's Way" (a shorter path along a stream that passes the house of
their friend Charles Swann.) Interestingly the one thing that absolutely
everyone knows about this book -- that the narrator's memory is sparked by the
scent of a madeleine -- is wrong: it's actually the taste of a cup of tea that
a slightly burnt madeleine has been dipped in. The sense of smell isn't even
mentioned. Anyway the taste of the tea causes what Proust called
"involuntary memory", a rush of memories, images, associations, all
arising in your mind all at once in no sort of order, and the whole novel --
all seven volumes of it -- is meant to evoke that chaotic rush of images. I
don't like the narrator much, as he seems kind of cynical, assuming the worst about
everyone, and he's also a dreadful voyeur; he invents elaborate reasons why
it's a wholly innocent accident that he happens to be hidden in the bushes
outside someone's window where he can see and hear everything inside without
being seen himself, which I don't think are even meant to be believed. He also
gives involved descriptions of the inner feelings of the people he talks about,
down to the tiniest shade of nuance, things he couldn't possibly know, so he
must be inventing them to amuse himself. A very long section of the book is
given to an episode before the narrator was born (although he describes it all
with as much detail as though everyone involved had spoken to him about it with
less reserve than in the Confessional) about a love-affair between Charles
Swann and a woman named Odette. A lot of that part might as well have been set
on an alien planet for all I could relate to it; it was all about society
gatherings and what makes a person a desirable guest, and to what extent wit
makes up for lack of aristocratic birth and vice versa. The hostesses, who are
shown as petty tyrants, are constantly decreeing people "very witty"
or "too dull for words" with so little reason that I have to conclude
that none of them have any idea of what wit or good taste actually are, and
they're only playing a sort of charade. That may be the point of that section,
I don't know. I didn't like Swann much, but I liked Odette and her
unjustifiably snooty friends even less, so I was glad for Swann when the affair
ended badly. There are six volumes still to go to make up the whole novel, so I
will probably have to come back to this several times -- I don't suppose I'll
be able to hold the whole thing in my mind at once.
The
American -- Henry James
Way
back in one of my college classes -- Major British Writers, I think -- I had a
terrific professor, a Socialist firebrand who really knew and loved the
material (his lectures on the cultural background were things like "Europe
then was dominated by Kaiser Wilhelm, an inbred moron ... novels in England
were partly formed by the tastes of King George the Fifth -- another idiot, by
the way --" I never skipped that class.) One day he mentioned The
American because of a scene in it that he described vividly and said was a
real picture of the change in European-American relations in the nineteenth
century. The American hero, Christopher Newman (ha ha) wants to marry a woman
from a noble French family; he speaks to her mother, an old dragon who coldly
tells him he's not good enough and turns away to indicate the conversation is
over. But Newman, instead of slinking away, simply says "I'm rich."
After a pause, the woman turns back and says "How rich?" My professor
described this so well that soon afterwards I bought the book; but right about
then, for another class, I read What Maisie Knew and Daisy Miller,
both of which I hated, so The American sat on my shelf unread for 27
years, until now. I liked it a lot. Newman is a very likable hero, a man who's
worked for a living since age ten and retired rich in his thirties, and has
come to Europe to see some culture. He's a picture of what James considered the
best sort of American, a direct, honest, thoroughly good-natured man who's
inclined to take people as they are. The scene with the old noblewoman is just
as my professor descibed it. The main conflict is internal: after Newman
becomes engaged to his fiancée Claire, her mother and brother forbid the
marriage and force her out of Paris, and since she cannot bring herself to
marry against the will of her family Claire joins a Carmelite convent. At the
same time Newman learns that Claire's family has a terrible secret and gets
hold of evidence that if published will ruin them. He debates making it public;
on the one hand he frankly admits that he has been hurt and wants to hurt them
back, while on the other hand ferreting out other people's secrets seems like a
low and nasty thing to do. Eventually he burns the evidence, deciding that
using it would be beneath him. One of James's points, I think, is that a
smaller man would have published the evidence, in the same way that Claire's
brother fought a duel rather than let an unimportant insult pass; but America
has the potential to produce bigger men. Newman never does see Claire again,
either, which I liked because that would have cheapened the ending.
The
Eternal Husband -- Fyodor Dostoyevsky
A
late novella, generally praised by people who can read Russian as his most
successful piece of pure craftsmanship; I'll have to take their word for that,
although I did like it. It tells the story of Velchaninov, a middle-aged,
moderately well-off landowner, who is living in St. Petersburg because he's
involved in a contentious trial about a disputed tract of land. He doesn't
really like city life and he finds the trial exasperating, plus he's a bit of a
hypochondriac, so he's testy and unsocial. One day he unexpectedly meets
Trusotsky, a man from a country town where Velchaninov once held a government
post; they were friendly then but they have not seen each other in years.
Velchaninov is stunned to learn that Trusotsky's wife Natalia has recently
died. It turns out that Velchaninov had an affair with Natalia and her breaking
it off was why he left that town. Velchaninov isn't inclined to renew the friendship,
especially because Trusotsky has deteriorated and become an alcoholic; but for
old times' sake he sees him once or twice, and meets his daughter Liza, who is
neglected and ill. Doing the math Velchaninov becomes convinced that Liza is
actually his own daughter, and he arranges for her to go live with a country
couple in hopes of recuperating, but her illness worsens and she dies.
Trusotsky, wishing to marry a much younger woman, takes Velchaninov -- who
doesn't feel he can refuse -- along to a party at her house, but is enraged
when the woman and her friends make fun of him while showing marked respect to
Velchaninov, and later he gets drunk and tries to murder Velchaninov with a
razor -- because of the party? Because of Liza? Because of the affair with
Natalia? It's hard to say. Anyway Velchaninov runs him off but doesn't report
him to the police, and soon after the trial ends in his favor and he can return
home, so he's much happier and more relaxed. Not long after that he meets
Trusotsky again in a train station, accompanied by his new wife, a younger
woman; Trusotsky pointedly does not ask Velchaninov to come visit them, but
watching the behavior of a young and handsome soldier traveling with them,
Velchaninov is convinced that Trusotsky's second marriage will turn out the
same as the first. It really held my attention.
*The
Decipherment of Linear B -- John Chadwick
A
good book on the Minoan stone tablets dating from about 1400 BCE or so. There
are two distinct alphabets, known as Linear A and B. Linear A has never been
deciphered, because there just aren't enough existing samples of it for study.
There have been several discoveries of Linear B tablets at several sites,
though; the tablets were made of clay, and in places where there was a major fire
the tablets baked to stone. People attempted to decipher them for a hundred
years or so, but no real progress got made until an Englishman named Michael
Ventris -- an architect who taught himself ancient languages as a hobby --
worked on it in the 1940s and realized that the tablets were written in a form
of ancient Greek. Chadwick worked with Ventris to help him publish his book, so
he had first-hand knowledge of how Ventris approached the problem. For such an
esoteric subject it's very readable, laid out almost like a mystery novel.
Really interesting.
Walkin'
the Dog -- Walter Mosley
A
second collection of stories about the ex-con Socrates Fortlow, who lives in LA
in a sort-of apartment that's really the space between two industrial
buildings. Most of the book deals with his efforts just to keep his head above
water; the hours-long bus rides to his job at the supermarket, keeping his
temper when dealing with the hostile middle manager, looking after a homeless
boy he feels responsible for. There's a striking scene in the middle of the
book where he gets mugged; Mosley has done such a good job of building up our
idea of Socrates as a hugely strong man that it's genuinely shocking when the
much younger mugger just shrugs off his punches. (Socrates eventually wins the
fight by hitting the guy in the head with a rock.) It's notable that pretty
much as soon as he has a steady income he becomes more active in resisting
social injustice. The climax of the book involves him making a public
demonstration against racist police brutality and losing his little gains
because of it. Very well written.
North
of Nowhere -- Steve Hamilton
Usually
I'm put off by books that say "A Name-of-Protagonist Novel!" on the
cover, but I've liked other books by this author so I picked this up and
immediately regretted it. It's a story about an asshole who lives by himself
somewhere in a very cold place -- far northern Minnesota, I think? -- and who
for some reason, even though he's an open and unapologetic jerk, still has
devoted friends who insist on hanging out with him despite the way he treats
them. I got as far as a scene where the inexplicably devoted friend is
insisting on the hero joining him in some hunting expedition or something, but
I got fed up and threw the book away so I may not be describing that
accurately. I didn't like it, is what I'm saying.
Saint
Thomas Aquinas: The Dumb Ox -- G.K. Chesterton
This
book was really just one long sneer. Chesterton was very much a laudator
temporis acti, and he seems only to have written the book in order to have
a platform to compare the brilliance of the thirteenth century with the dull
stupidity of twentieth-century writers other than himself. You know those
modern pagans who are always saying things like "Ooh, science is only now
discovering things that shamans understood perfectly thousands of years ago"?
Chesterton is like that. There's very little actual information about the saint
himself; most of those passages are descriptions of what Chesterton imagined
Aquinas's state of mind to be, which tells you rather more about Chesterton
than it does about Aquinas.
The
Night in Question -- Tobias Wolff
A
well-written short-story collection, with some war stories and some
slice-of-life stories. There was a good one about an overworked newspaper
editor who gets fired after he runs the obituary of a guy who's still alive
(the guy, it turns out, sent in his own obituary just so he could see something
nice about himself in print); another about a young teenager whose divorced
father takes him out one night and insists on driving through heavy snow on
unsafe roads, with a very good sense of the boy's ill-hidden fear of his father
and the unstated reasons for it. I really liked the Vietnam story where the
narrator's buddy keeps getting singled out by their unit's commander, who
doesn't like him, to go on dangerous night recon missions; the narrator,
reflecting that the experience of war has taken away everything he liked about
himself except one thing -- the conviction that he's the kind of man who'd do
anything to help a buddy -- nerves himself up to volunteer in his buddy's
place, but the buddy gets killed before he can and he's left to deal with the
guilt he feels over being relieved that he won't have to volunteer now. Good
book.
The
Specialist -- Chic Sale
A
short book from the twenties, a prose adaptation of Sale's vaudeville routine:
a comic monologue where Sale played a hayseed carpenter giving the audience a
lecture on the tricks of the trade involved in building an outhouse. It was
probably funnier on stage, but I liked it.
Integration
is a BITCH! -- Tom Floyd
A
very funny collection of cartoons from the sixties about being the only black
guy at an office job. A lot of them are pretty savage -- the hero working late,
clearly within view of the receptionist saying on the phone "No, all the
men have gone home"; a white co-worker about to tell a joke but changing
his mind when he sees the hero. My favorite was a cartoon of the office going
out to a movie: the scene on the movie screen shows a pair of Great White
Hunter types tied up and menaced by black tribesmen, and our hero is loudly
cheering while all his co-workers glare at him. It was good reading, and a
reminder that not a lot has changed since then.
The
Grid -- Gretchen Bakke
A
really good book about America's power grid, which is actually three grids: one
for east of the Mississippi, one for west of the Mississippi (which also
includes parts of western Canada and northern Mexico) and a separate one for
Texas. An important thing about the grid is that it wasn't designed, it just
sort of happened -- and it's been in more or less its current state since
before World War II. The Carter administration established the Department of
Energy partly to prepare for an overhaul of the power grid, although naturally
nothing ever got done. One problem is that our electrical systems work so well
that no one ever thinks about them, even though the grid started to fail about
fifteen years ago and we're only now starting to do something about it. Another
is that, as presently constituted, the grid only really works well when it has
constant, consistent, predictable input -- exactly what solar and wind power
don't provide. Yet another, and really the most important one, is that
electricity, practically speaking, can't be stored. Every watt of power you use
was created the instant before you used it. This is a problem because for a
balanced system variable output is just as bad as variable input. There's a
huge spike in demand around five PM, when people get home from work and turn on
the TV and the microwave and do their laundry and crank the AC or the heat, and
then a big valley when people turn everything off and go to bed. (This is why
devices that consume a lot of power, such as dishwashers and especially dryers,
now usually come with a timer option so you can set them to run in the middle
of the night to even out the demands on the grid.) With hydroelectric power you
can just turn a faucet to make the power output go up or down with demand; but
you can't turn the wind off, and if you call up the wind farm and ask them to
stop some of their windmills, powering them down takes time, even if they're
willing to do it -- which they may not be, if they're paid by the
kilowatt-hour. Windmills that aren't turning don't generate revenue. The grid
needs to be made more robust, which probably means overhauling the monolithic
grid into a much larger number of smaller semi-independent grids, so a series
of outages in Ohio (often caused by power companies failing to trim the trees
near their high-power lines) won't cause a blackout over the whole East Coast.
There will also have to be some spillover mechanism, so that one grid getting
too much input can reroute some of the output to another grid in order to stay balanced.
Large-scale battery farms would be good too, but we appear to have reached the
limit of battery technology, and until someone works out a way to synthesize
lithium we're stuck. Very, very good book.
Black
Betty -- Walter Mosley
The
fourth Easy Rawlins book. We've jumped ahead five years to 1961, and Easy is
living in a rented house with his two adopted children because most of his
money is tied up in a real estate project, which he's running through a front
because he doesn't want any stakeholders to know that the primary investor is
black. A white private eye asks him to take on a job looking for a black woman
who's gone missing; Easy doesn't want to get involved but he needs the money so
he agrees. The missing woman is an older woman Easy knew in Texas when he was a
boy, and he tracks her into a morass of wills and inheritance and questions of
who is and isn't related. At the same time he's trying, in a
keep-at-a-safe-distance kind of way, to stop his conscienceless friend Mouse
from going on a murder spree; Mouse has just gotten out of prison after doing
five years for manslaughter, and not knowing who called the cops on him he's
decided just to kill everyone who might have done it. Easy manages to
sort out the missing-person case and stop Mouse from killing half the
neighborhood, but he loses his real-estate investment when his agent sells him
out to a group of rich white men. It really held my interest, I stayed up late
to finish it.
The
Great God Pan -- Arthur Machen
A
nineteenth-century horror story, built around implying that a young woman was
impregnated by the devil, later having a daughter who embodies evil. The prose
is a little purple. I don't know if the author intended this, but for me the
real horror of the story is the way the gentleman-scientist calmly asserts that
since he took the young woman off the streets in the first place, he's within
his rights to perform any experiments he feels like on her. It wasn't bad.
*The
Asey Mayo Trio -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
Three
wartime Asey Mayo novellas. The mysteries are silly but they're an interesting
picture of wartime life on the Cape: very few cars because of the lack of gas
and tires and parts; women running local businesses like the auto mechanic's
and the towing company, and doing a good job, much to everyone's surprise;
blackouts and rationed food and hoarding. Asey grumbles that such a heavy
blackout isn't really necessary three miles from the ocean, but Dad notes that
the blackout was just as heavy in Ashland, thirty miles further inland. People
get around on bicycles and horses and old horse-drawn carts -- Cousin Jennie
blisters Asey for leaving harnessed horses standing in the rain ("If your
grandfather knew you let horses stand!") One of the plots involves a
"fallen" branch that was actually planted in the road in order to
stop a moving truck to make enough time for the murder -- a ten-year-old boy
notices that the branch is out of place because it's maple and there are no
maple trees near that road. (Dad notes that it wouldn't be at all surprising
for even young children to know one tree from another back then, when people
were more "woodsy".)
Blues
For Mister Charlie -- James Baldwin
A
horrifying play based on the murder of Emmett Till. A white man murders a black
teenager and is acquitted by the all-white jury; the appalling open racism of
the prosecutor, the jury, and the townspeople generally is thoroughly laid out,
but the real stinger is the behavior of the "progressive" white
character, who vocally favors civil rights but ends up committing perjury at
the trial to save the murderer's life. This sums up Baldwin's opinion of the
civil rights movement: liberal whites can talk big all they want, but when push
comes to shove, black people can't rely on them. Nothing about that has changed
in the last fifty years, I think.
The
Man of Numbers -- Keith Devlin
A
biography of Leonardo of Pisa, the thirteenth-century Italian mathematician who
was most responsible for introducing Hindu-Arabic numerals to Europe. Leonardo
is widely known as "Fibonacci", a nickname made up by a 19th-century
historian based on the fact that in his most important book, Liber Abaci,
he referred to himself as filius Bonacci, "son of Bonacci" --
puzzling because his father's name was actually Guglielmo, but possibly he
meant "a relative of the Bonacci clan". Leonardo's father was a
prosperous merchant and from a young age Leonardo traveled with him all around
the Mediterranean and to several cities in Africa, where he first learned the
Hindu-Arabic numerals. He was something of a wunderkind: he published
his Liber Abaci, explaining the whole system of Hindu-Arabic
mathematics, when he was twenty-seven. The book clearly explains the vast
superiority of the Hindu-Arabic system to the Roman numerals then in use, with
chapters on subjects ranging from housekeeping to reckoning compound interest.
There are also chapters on abstract issues of number theory, such as primes and
irrational numbers and how much better the Hindu-Arabic numerals are at
representing fractional quantities. In one of these chapters he poses and
solves a word-problem dealing with the breeding of rabbits; his answer involves
an exponential series where each number is the sum of the two numbers preceding
it, which has become known as the "Fibonacci sequence". We know a
great deal about Leonardo's work but not a whole lot about his personal life,
so this book spends most of its time on his place in history. It was pretty
good.
The
Letters of James Branch Cabell -- Edward Wagenknecht, ed.
I
first saw Cabell's name mentioned in an aside in Neil Gaiman's Sandman,
a background detail I now realize was meant to establish that a character's
taste in books ran to the obscure. Cabell was a very popular writer in the
twenties, but his star dimmed after that, probably because of his artistic
vision: at some point he decided that all of his novels taken together should
comprise the spiritual biography of a medieval Spanish nobleman named Dom
Manuel, with the various novels' protagonists as Manuel's reincarnations. (It
would probably make more sense if I'd read more of his books.) The problem was
that he heavily re-wrote all his earlier novels to make them fall in line with
his new idea and then refused to let anyone publish the originals. (Imagine if
Isaac Asimov, after his ill-advised attempt in the late eighties to make all
his novels tie together, had gone back and re-written The Caves of Steel
to include time-traveling characters from The End of Eternity, and then
made that the only edition anyone could get.) I thought this collection wasn't
edited well, since the letters are arranged by recipient rather than
chronologically, which is needlessly confusing. I also got a picture of Cabell
as someone I would have disliked a great deal, mostly for his annoying artsily
superior attitude; the bulk of his letters seem to be all about how everyone is
too stupid to understand his work, and how all modern writers are garbage. It's
not enlivened by his O tempora, O mores laments about the incredible
sub-human imbecility of people who voted for Roosevelt. I felt like his
character was pretty well illustrated by a passage about how he didn't like
staying near the ocean, since its ceaseless motion was dull and insipid and
seeing the distant boats was a disagreeable reminder of the folly of human
striving, and like that. He says in several letters that he doesn't want to be
remembered solely as "the author of Jurgen", which is too bad
because that's the only one of his books anyone still reads. It's the only one
I've read, and after going through these letters I'm not going to bother with
any of the others, even if I could find them.
Iron
Dawn -- Richard Snow
An
extraordinarily well-written and gripping book about the building of the USS Monitor
and its battle with the ironclad Merrimack at Hampton Roads in 1862.
Technically only the Merrimack was an "ironclad" -- that is,
it was a wooden ship retrofitted with an iron framework; the Monitor was made
wholly of iron from the start. Speaking of technicalities, the author mentioned
that an academic once wrote a 200-page book on whether the ship's name was
properly the Merrimack or the Merrimac (concluding that the k
is proper because the ship was named after the river, not the town.) That's
wholly apart from the question of whether she should be called the Merrimack
at all, since the Confederacy renamed her the Virginia; the maritime
authorities say that since the Confederacy was never recognized by the US as a
legal government, it didn't have the authority to rename the ship, so the Merrimack
she remains. The book does a great job of illustrating the many characters
involved with both ships without ever getting bogged down, maintaining a
breathless pace right up to the Monitor's eleventh-hour arrival at the
Hampton Roads, literally in the nick of time to save the Union fleet and the
harbor behind it, and possibly the Union itself. Public opinion may never have
turned faster: when the Monitor steamed into Hampton Roads the onlookers
could not have been less impressed, since she was barely 150 feet long with a
deck only a few inches above the water, looking like nothing so much as a
cheese box floating on a plank. But after she single-handedly fought off the Merrimack,
against which the whole fleet had been helpless the day before, she was cheered
to the skies -- and more tellingly, when the news of the battle crossed the
Atlantic, the shipyards of Europe not only scrapped plans for building any more
wooden ships, but even abandoned work on the ones already in progress. A fantastic
book.
The
Pulp Jungle -- Frank Gruber
Gruber
was a prolific writer for the old pulp magazines, successful in his day but
forgotten now. This is a retrospective of his early days, written in the
sixties, long after the pulps had gone under. There's a lot of interesting
detail about living on a shoestring, like eating for free at automats (you took
a soup bowl and filled it up with hot water from the tea urn, crumbled some
free crackers into it, and sat at a table where you poured in half a bottle of
ketchup: voilà , tomato soup. Since automats didn't have waiters there
was no one to catch you.) There's also good stories about the oddball editors
of the thirties, like the one who got sick in the middle of a story meeting and
threw up his last night's drinking into the wastebasket while gesturing Gruber
to go on with his pitch. I would have liked it more except that I'm sure I
wouldn't have liked Gruber had I known him; he has only negative things to say
about anyone, and he goes off on stupid digressions about how college is bad
for people and how no editor has ever helped any writer in the slightest, and
how he, Gruber, earned absolutely everything in his life through his own hard
work and owed nothing at all to anyone. He has a telling habit: several times
he tells the same story, with only the names and locales changed, of how he got
into an argument with someone and there was just about to be a fight, but the
other guy saw the look in his eyes and backed down. Never having met anyone
involved I can still guarantee you that none of those almost-fights ever
happened anywhere outside Gruber's imagination. The book is as well-written as
Gruber's fiction, which is to say it's only competent; his books have been out
of print for fifty years and more.
Witches,
Midwives, and Nurses -- Barbara Ehrenreich and Deirdre English
A
very interesting book, originally published as a pamphlet in the early
seventies and spread through samizdat. Its overall concern is to
describe how women were deliberately and systematically pushed out of roles in
health care, a process accelerated by the anti-empiricism of the nineteenth
century, a period when essentially all doctors were quacks. Men running hospitals
in the 1800s and 1900s established a canonical procedure, and they stuck to
that procedure even if it killed the patient. To justify themselves they had to
insist that women healers were ignorant butchers (in the same way that medieval
women who challenged the male hierarchy were labeled witches and silenced) even
though 19th- century female midwives had a far better record of patient
survival than male obstetricians, and the experience of labor and birth was far
less traumatic for patients of midwives, which meant a faster and healthier
recovery, which continues to be true today. Some of the research the book
originally quoted has since been shown to be incorrect, mostly because of new
research that only happened because this book was written; this edition
incorporates the newer research, which doesn't change the basic conclusions. It
would probably be hard to overestimate the effect this book had on
labor-and-delivery treatment and nursing generally over the last forty years.
My mom went to nursing school in the early fifties and the emphasis then was on
robotically following the doctors' orders; the school was more tightly
regimented than the Army and nurses were taught never to use their own
judgement. Today one of the main functions of a nurse is to keep an eye on the
doctors and make sure they don't screw up.
Red
Harvest -- Dashiell Hammett
An
excellent noir story from the twenties. It's the book that inspired Kurosawa to
make Yojimbo, which means it's also ultimately the source for A
Fistful of Dollars and Last Man Standing and every other movie that
copied Kurosawa: the story of a crooked town run by gangs and the nameless
stranger who rides in and cleans it up by setting all the criminal gangs
against each other, while leaving you in doubt about his personal morality
until the end. The stranger in this case is the Continental Op, a recurring
short-story character of Hammett's, here appearing in his first novel. He's an
operative for the Continental Detective Agency, a fictional version of the
Pinkertons (Hammett was a Pinkerton agent in real life.) He's sent by the
agency to the fictional California town of Personville, where's he's supposed
to take on a job for the publisher of the local newspaper, but the publisher is
murdered before they can meet; the Op learns that the publisher was leading a
campaign to clean up the town, and his murder has sparked the local crime
bosses -- one of whom is the chief of police -- to start blaming each other.
The Op finds out that the publisher was actually killed by a jealous rival over
a woman, which would be enough to calm things down, except that by that time
the police chief has already tried twice to have the Op killed, and to get even
the Op decides to bring down all the gangs and sets out to sow dissension among
them. The book is elevated by a strong scene in the middle -- a scene that
didn't make it into any of the movie adaptations -- where the Op has to get
drunk so he can ignore his conscience, because he knows that his plan will
directly cause the death of dozens of people, and he has to think about what
kind of man his job has turned him into. It's a terrific read, fast-moving and
exciting, full of shootouts, narrow escapes, car chases, even a femme fatale
-- everything you'd want from a pulp story.
The
Big Gold Dream -- Chester Himes
A
Harlem novel from the early sixties. This one involves another religious scam
-- every preacher who appears in any Himes story is a cynical, philandering con
man. When a woman apparently drops dead of poisoning during a street salvation
show, a lot of plot lines get set in motion -- the hair-trigger detectives
Grave Digger and Coffin Ed come to investigate the poisoning; the woman's
husband rushes to find the money he's convinced she's stashed away; the local vultures
hurry to her apartment to sell her furniture to a pawn shop. A couple more
murders happen there after the pawnbroker finds a pile of cash hidden inside
the sofa, but that turns out to be a red herring since the money is Confederate
scrip that's been in the sofa for a hundred years. Eventually the detectives
threaten and pistol-whip their way to the answer, which I found kind of
unsatisfying. I didn't think it was one of his best.
The
Head of Kay's -- P.G. Wodehouse
A
school story, about an older boy who gets stuck being the student-in-charge of
a school house run by a fussy, petty, ineffective schoolmaster named Kay. As
far as I can tell Wodehouse legitimately believed that the real business of a
school is turning out boys who are good at playing rugby and cricket. I didn't
think much of it.
Celebrated
Cases of Judge Dee -- Robert H. Gulik, trans.
A
very interesting book -- a Chinese detective novel from the 18th century,
featuring a real-life judge named Di Ren-jieh who lived during the Tang
dynasty. The novel was written a thousand years after Di's lifetime, so it
doesn't pretend to be literally factual. Gulik was a diplomat who worked for
the Dutch embassy to the Kuomintang during World War II; he spent his free time
translating Chinese literature, including this book. The novel tells the story
of a busy two or three weeks in Judge Dee's life, when he has to solve three
complicated cases more or less simultaneously -- a Tang-era judge was a
combination judge, detective, and policeman. Chinese detective stories usually
have supernatural elements and long digressions about philosophy; Gulik says in
his preface that he chose to translate this book particularly because it has
little philosophy and only one ghost, so it's closer to Western detective
fiction. I had mixed feelings about the story. On the one hand I liked how Dee
never accepts the easy answer and always pushes on to find the truth, even at
risk to his career and life; on the other hand, he's amazingly callous and has
nearly everyone who appears in his court tortured, just to see if their story
changes under torment. It was a pretty lively story, full of interesting
characters; I thought it was well done.
Karma
Cola -- Gita Mehta
A
book about the modern "selling" of India, a process that began in the
1960s, when large numbers of hippies from Europe and America came to India on
self-described spiritual pilgrimages; according to Mehta, when the Indians
realized that the Westerners were coming to India looking to fill up the
emptiness in their lives, they cynically packaged up various Indian mystical
traditions and made them into a commodity to sell to gullible
enlightenment-tourists. Throughout the book I kept thinking of the A3 song
"Ain't Goin' to Goa", especially the bit where D.Wayne says "The
righteous truth is, there ain't nothin' worse than some fool lyin' on some
third-world beach in spandex psychedelic trousers, smokin' damn dope and
pretendin' he gettin' consciousness expansion!" The same sort of thing
happened in Okinawa in the fifties and sixties, with the swarm of fake
martial-arts teachers preying on the ignorance of the Americans and drowning
out the small number of genuine karate masters, and Mehta thinks it had
something of the same effect in India: with armies of con artists pushing
made-up temples and cults and retreats to take advantage of the tourists,
people lost respect for the actual yogis and lamas and parama-hamsas who
have been a prominent thread in Indian culture for thousands of years, which
she thinks contributes heavily to a spiritual flattening in modern-day India. A
really good book.
The
Revenge of Analog -- David Sax
This
is a book about the persistence and even resurgence of analog technology in the
last ten or fifteen years. I didn't like the writing style; it was already a
bad sign in the introduction when the author managed to repeat the title of the
book fourteen times in four pages. It's divided into chapters on various
currently-thriving analog products, such as vinyl LPs or Moleskin notebooks.
The author doesn't really have an argument to make, simply relying on a barrage
of words like "magical", "somehow",
"indefinably", and "authentic", while working hard not to
notice that all these products are expensive luxury goods for niche markets. I
thought it was pretty pointless and I didn't finish it.
Why
the Wheel is Round -- Steven Vogel
I
thought this was great. It's written by an engineer and it shows -- the writing
is so dry I could only read a chapter at a time, but the information was
fascinating. It's all about the engineering challenges of wheels and wheeled
vehicles and how they probably came to be invented, with long sections on
axles, undercarriages, friction problems (wooden axles are almost always made
from the lignum vitae plant, because it's extraordinarily dense and it
exudes oil under pressure), spinning jennies, flywheels (made with the majority
of the mass on the rim because of angular momentum), treadmills, gears,
millstones, and more. I had always thought pocket-watches were bejewelled
simply out of vainglory, but it turns out that the watch escapement is a
rotating rod; for the watch to be accurate the rod can't be deformed by the
pressure of the watch plate, which means it needs to be harder than steel, so
that's why they used diamonds. I really liked it.
The
Right Mistake -- Walter Mosley
The
third collection of short stories about the aging ex-con Socrates Fortlow. I
didn't think it was as good as the first two. The arc that connects the stories
is Socrates's founding of a community center where people from various
backgrounds can meet and talk out their problems. Throughout the book we're
told how important the work they do there is, and how important and influential
everyone says it is, but we don't actually see very much of it so we really
just have to take the omniscient narrator's word for it. The book gives a lot
of time to the first real romantic relationship Socrates has had since getting
out of prison, which was believable but didn't make me care about it, and then
ends with a fantasy piece of wish-fulfillment where Socrates kills a policeman
in self-defense and then gets acquitted at the trial even though he's a poor
black man who's previously served thirty years for rape and murder. I wasn't
engaged.
Amédée
-- Eugene Ionesco
An
absurdist play about Amédée, a playwright, and his wife Madeleine, a
switchboard operator, who live in an apartment somewhere in France. Both are
unable to concentrate on their work because they're distracted by the presence
of a man's dead body in their guest room. It's never explained who the man is
or how he died; they tell several conflicting stories about it, but the only
sure thing is that the body has been there for years and they're terrified of
the neighbors finding out. As if angry at being ignored, the corpse has somehow
been causing mushrooms to grow all over the apartment, and as the play opens
it's begun growing -- Amédée and Madeleine are constantly going over and
looking in on it in horrified fascination. Eventually the body's legs burst through
into the main room -- which must be fun to stage -- and Amédée decides to drag
the body out the window and throw it in the river, but he gets tangled in the
legs and when the body inexplicably flies away into the air he's carried away
with it. If the play has a point beyond weirdness for weirdness's sake, I
didn't see it.
*Going,
Going, GONE -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
An
Asey Mayo story, where Asey comes home from the tank-manufacturing plant for a
long weekend and gets roped into taking Cousin Jennie to an auction, which he
hates. (Cousin Syl isn't there to take her because he's fighting in the
Pacific, of course.) Taylor seems to know a lot about auctioneers and she
spends a lot of time on the auction, getting some laughs out of Asey's sour
opinion of the Currier and Ives prints that all auctions were loaded with back
then -- he grumbles that Jennie is a sucker for "paintings of little boys
who look like they're dying of malnutrition." As predicted, Jennie buys a
Currier and Ives print along with a broken whatnot that she expects Asey to fix
up, which is kind of more interesting than the actual plot, which involves a
dead body turning up inside a locked chest at the auction, and Asey solving the
murder by figuring out what happened to the big pile of heavy books that was in
the chest originally. The victim was on the rationing board; war rationing,
especially of food and gas, was always a big presence in everyone's mind --
Dad, sixty years later, could still rattle off the details of the A, B, and C stickers
for gas priority from memory. There are a lot of other war details -- car
headlights are all painted black on the upper half, old Doc Cummings is the
only MD for three towns around because all the others are in the Army, and Asey
has trouble chasing a bad guy because all the open spaces he's used to running
through have been filled up with Victory Gardens. I liked it.
Crazy
Rich Asians -- Kevin Kwan
This
was funny but I didn't totally get into it because I didn't really like anyone.
The heroine is Rachel, a professor at NYU, who's dating a fellow-professor,
Nick, who invites her to come to Singapore as his guest for the wedding of his
best friend, for whom he is the best man. Nick fails to warn Rachel that the
bride and groom are among the richest people in the world, and that he himself
comes from a family of immeasurable wealth. The book didn't manage to persuade
me that it was believable that Nick could have thought that the culture and
class shock between Rachel and his family wouldn't be important and that he
didn't even think he needed to prepare Rachel at all. Most of the book is given
to satirical descriptions of the ridiculous excess that Nick's family wallows
in, contrasted with their pathetic narrow-mindedness, since his relatives care
about nothing whatever outside of their net worth and spend whatever time
they're not managing their portfolios in bitter gossip and back-stabbing. It
was all very soap-opera-ish, and I kind of wanted everyone in the book to drop
dead. I did get a lot of laughs out of it, but not enough to make me want to
read the sequels.
*Within
a Budding Grove -- Marcel Proust
The
second part of Remembrance of Things Past. I'm not clear just how old
the narrator is in this novel, but it's somewhere in the middle teens. The
first part returns to his life at Combray (based on Illiers, in north-Central
France -- the village actually changed its name to Combray because of Proust!)
and his parents' social life, particularly the dinner guests, with whom the
narrator can converse now that he's old enough to sit at the table with the
adults. The conversations are wide-ranging, but the narrator concentrates on
the ones about art -- he's an aesthetically inclined person, very interested in
painting, music, theater, architecture, and especially the design of clothes;
he sometimes spends pages at a time discussing women's dresses (really to the
point of weariness -- I started skimming those passages.) He also becomes more
acquainted with the Swann family, and develops a crush on the Swanns' daughter,
Gilberte, who's about his age. Even though we were warned in the first novel
that Swann had made an imprudent marriage and was no longer as well received in
society because of his wife's low character, I was surprised to find out that
Madame Swann is in fact the same Odette with whom he carried on the long and
unhappy affair described in the "Swann In Love" section of the first
book, which ended with the two of them realizing they didn't like each other
and breaking it off. I wonder what changed? Anyway the whole middle of the book
covers the narrator's crush on Gilberte and his later puppy-like infatuation
with her mother. There's another memory-scene, set in a park in summer, where
Gilberte is teasing the narrator by playing keep-away with a letter of his; he
wrestles with her for it and unexpectedly has his first orgasm (described very
allusively by the Victorian Moncrieff -- I had to read that passage several
times before I understood what had happened.) As he leaves in confusion, the odor
of sex, which he's now consciously smelling for the first time, suddenly brings
back the memory of his childhood visits to the apartment of his uncle Adolphe,
described in Swann's Way, and he understands for the first time what the
women who visited his uncle were there for.
The
last section, about half the book, covers a months-long visit to the fictional
coastal town of Balbec, where his parents send him for his health, accompanied
by his grandmother. He wavers between adolescence and adulthood, making friends
with well-known artists and society people but generally preferring the company
of the crowd of teenage girls visiting the resort for the summer. Among these
is Albertine Simonet, apparently destined to become the love of his life later
on, but at this time he's more or less in love with all of them, intoxicated by
their youthful beauty and the general undercurrent of sexual awakening. (This
is the significance of the title in French, À l'ombre des jeunes filles en
fleurs, literally "In the shadow of young girls in flower".) As
the summer fades the girls go home one by one, until only the narrator and his
grandmother are left in the cold, half-manned hotel, finally leaving in the
autumn with the narrator realizing that the picture of those girls on the sunny
beach will stay in his mind forever. My attention wandered sometimes and it
took me a while to get through it, but I did enjoy it.
The
Impossible Fortress -- Jason Rekulak
This
was basically an After-School Special, if you remember those: a silly
morality-play for teenagers. It's even set in the mid-80s, the After-School
Special's heyday. It's the story of a nerdy kid in his early teens and his
loser friends, whose dumb plan to obtain a Playboy magazine gets them
all in trouble. I had the same problem with it that I had with the TV
equivalents, in that the hero is absurdly powerless against peer pressure,
letting other kids push him into an idiotic scheme for breaking into a
convenience store that involves luring away dogs, crossing rooftops on planks,
and deactivating alarm codes. I just couldn't accept that the hero would never
have said "Okay, that's enough" at any of the several points where he
has the opportunity to walk away. I'm sure the author didn't intend it, but I
ended up regarding the hero as a genuinely bad person who deserved a lot more
punishment than he got, and I thought everyone forgave him way too readily. I
didn't like it.
The
Death of Napoleon --- Simon Leys
A
short novel that imagines Napoleon escaped from St. Helena in 1821 by switching
places with a lookalike. He plans to announce his return and raise his
loyalists when he reaches Paris, but his ship gets diverted and he lands in
Belgium, from where he has to make his way to Paris on foot, crossing the
battlefield of Waterloo on the way; he's bemused at how it's become a crass
tourist trap. Before he can raise his loyalists in Paris his lookalike on St.
Helena suddenly dies, and Napoleon, now officially dead, has lost his chance.
At loose ends he rents a room above a failing grocery, and for want of anything
else to do he devotes his genius and energy to saving the grocery, inspiring
the fruit-sellers with passionate discipline and organizing them to ruthlessly
crush their competition. There's a terrific scene where he's recognized by an
anti-Bonapartist, who lures him into the grounds of an insane asylum for people
who imagine themselves to be Napoleon, and he needs to escape all over again. I
thought it was really good.
One
L -- Scott Turow
A
memoir of the famously difficult first year at Harvard Law School, which Turow
went through in 1975. Like all students, Turow thought the classes were too
hard and the professors were too strict and the work load was too heavy. He did
a decent job of showing his enthusiasm for the law deteriorating under the
weight of first-year burnout. He spent a lot of time on the students'
resentment of the law professors and the intimidating practice of interrogating
individual students on the reading, but I really sided with the professors,
which I'm sure Turow didn't intend. I didn't have a lot of sympathy for the
students, who seemed kind of whiny, and though Turow seemed to think it was
some kind of epoch-making heroism when a student refused to answer a
professor's question, it just looked like stupid petulance to me. I also
thought Turow spent too much time patting himself on the back for his idealism
in dreaming of pursuing law in the courts, as opposed to classmates who intended
to go straight into corporate law. I did think he did a good job of describing
the fierce competition over grades, which only grew stronger over the course of
the year, with students building up bitter hatred for other students who did
better on exams. Overall I found the book kind of unpleasant.
The
Glass Key -- Dashiell Hammett
A
terrific noir thriller set in an unnamed American city in the twenties. The
hero is a gambler named Ned, the right-hand man of the city's top crime boss,
Paul Madvig. As the book opens he finds a dead body in the street, the son of
the senior Senator from his state. There are all kinds of cross-purposes:
Madvig's machine has been backing the Senator in the upcoming election;
Madvig's daughter has secretly been dating the Senator's son; Madvig is trying
to marry the Senator's daughter. Madvig's enemies, who are backing the
opposition candidate, soon use the newspapers to blame Madvig for the murder,
and tar the Senator by association. Unlike most noir heroes, who are generally
pretty cynical and detached, Ned is wholly driven by loyalty to Madvig, his
best friend. He also realizes right away what happened with the murder -- when
he explains his reasoning at the end, I felt pretty dumb for not seeing it that
way before. It's really well written, exciting and suspenseful, and a very good
character portrait at the same time. I really liked it.
*Proof
of the Pudding -- Phoebe Atwood Taylor
Asey
Mayo arrives home on the Cape after V-J Day, as the tank plant is converting
back to an auto plant and Asey can return to retirement. He gets to his house
to find a big party and assumes it's a welcome-home, but in fact it's his
cousin Jennie having a charity sale to raise money for victims of the hurricane
of 1945, which hit the Cape only a couple weeks before. Shooed out from
underfoot, Asey wnaders over the storm-wrack and (naturally) almost immediately
trips over a dead body. The victim is the daughter of a man Asey had a fight
with forty years ago, so the whole town decides Asey killed her, which I had a
hard time swallowing. The real solution is silly, as usual, with the killer
being revealed out of the blue two pages from the end and no motive ever
mentioned. There's some meta-humor as Asey visits a book store and rambles on
about clues in mystery novels for two full pages, even remarking that the best
thing about them is often the local color! Dad notes that the killer is the
most blasé murderer of all time -- when nabbed he just says "Okay, I'll go
quietly" and conversationally tells Asey he would have gotten away with it
if Asey hadn't come home. It was all right but not that memorable.
A
Little Yellow Dog -- Walter Mosley
The
fifth Easy Rawlins novel. We've moved ahead a couple years to 1963 and Easy has
used his favor-for-favor connections to get himself a city job as a head
janitor in the school system, for the pension and for security for his two
adopted children. He's arranged a job for his friend Mouse, who's going through
an existential crisis after killing a friend (who may actually have been his
father) in a fit of drunken anger. I didn't like this setup as much as some of
the other books; Easy has arranged his life to stay out of trouble, and so the
author has to use coincidence to make trouble find him, which is something the
reader has to consciously forgive for the sake of the story, which I find less
satisfying than having the trouble arise naturally out of the hero's life.
Anyway, it turns out one of the teachers is involved with a
theft-slash-drug-smuggling ring that's being run out of the school, which leads
to several murders and Easy putting his job at risk by investigating, for no
better reason than that he doesn't like the cop in charge. It wasn't my
favorite.
1066
and All That -- W. C. Sellar and R. J. Yeatman
A
terrific satirical history of England, as though written by an indifferent
student trying to put down what he vaguely remembers from school: such events
as the Disillusion of the Monasteries (when all the monks got tired of the
religious life, apparently) and the Industrial Revelation. It's very funny, and
I imagine it's even funnier for people who went through the sort of schooling
the book is parodying. The book insists that the only two important dates in
history are 55 BC (the landing of the Romans) and 1066 (the Norman Conquest)
and you can just fudge the rest. There's a half-accurate litany of the
monarchs, judged Good or Bad on half-remembered criteria. It was immensely
popular, so much so that Robert Graves titled his autobiography Good-Bye to
All That, confident that his readers would know what he meant. I thought it
was great.
*Letters
to Milena -- Franz Kafka
In
1920 the writer Milena Jesenská translated Kafka's early stories into Czech;
she wrote to him about it, and the business correspondence gradually developed
into a passionate love affair, conducted almost entirely by letter -- the two
of them met only twice, and then briefly. Milena was 23, about twelve years
younger than Kafka; she was from Prague, but lived in Vienna in a very unhappy
marriage with Ernst Pollak, whom Kafka knew slightly. (Pollak was a believer in
the free-love philosphies of Otto Gross; in modern parlance they had an open
marriage, but open only on his side.) She was also in poor health, due to
poverty, malnutrition, and overwork -- her husband was chronically ill. The
letters, written in both German and Czech, go back and forth between literary
affairs and personal ones; Milena was the only person who called Kafka
"Frank", a pet name arising from a misreading of the way he signed
his name -- "FranzK". Their situation seems tailor-made for Kafka's
tragic view of life: she was unable to leave Vienna (partly because of her
husband's illness, partly because she couldn't support herself in Prague due to
the hostility of her family -- her father, a domestic tyrant, had actually had
her confined in an asylum rather than let her marry a Jew, and she only got out
when she came of age at 21) while Kafka couldn't move there, because of his
work and family responsibilities in Prague and because of his own illness -- he
was slowly dying of tuberculosis. Kafka felt able to talk to Milena about
things he normally kept to himself, and the letters describe the constant,
inescapable anxiety that ruled his life, and which he called the fear.
He was tormented by self-loathing -- he had the idea that sexual desire was
"filthy", and his own libido filled him with disgust. He was also
very sensitive, and felt insults keenly, another source of trouble considering
he said that living in Prague was like "wallowing" in anti-Semitic
hatred. They wrote each other three or four times a day for seven or eight months,
until Kafka ended the correspondence because it was too painful, since Milena
thought that Pollak was too dependent on her for her to leave him, and they had
very little contact from then on; Kafka died three and a half years later,
leaving Milena his diaries and papers (which she later gave to Max Brod,
although she arranged to have her own letters to Kafka burned.) She wrote an
insightful and moving obituary for him and lived on until she died in the
Ravensbruck concentration camp during the war. I wouldn't say I enjoyed the
book, exactly, but I'm glad to have read it. One odd thing: there are a few
places where the end-notes say that a few lines were "removed to comply
with privacy laws"; I wonder what could still be covered by even European
privacy laws ninety years after Kafka's death and seventy years after Milena's?
Ice
in the Bedroom -- P.G. Wodehouse
This
was really a retelling of his earlier novel Sam the Sudden: once again
the never-quite-successful criminals "Chimp" Twist and the Molloys
know about a treasure hidden in a house in the pleasant London suburb of Valley
Fields, and are frustrated in their attempts to go after it by the unrelated
love-affairs of a young man (the Drone Freddie Widgeon this time). This one was
funnier, though, largely due to the presence of Leila Yorke, a famous novelist:
she's a boisterous, hard-drinking life-of-the-party type who makes a fortune
writing sob-story romances, but to the chagrin of her publisher she's decided
to write a searing-exposé-of-life's-dark-underbelly, George Gissing sort of
novel. Freddie, who works (incompetently) at the publisher and coincidentally
is in love with Leila's secretary (unsurprisingly named Sally, as nearly all of
Wodehouse's heroines are) suggests to Leila that she rent the house next door
to him in order to experience the bleak despair of suburban life. Mrs. Molloy
hid a stolen diamond necklace in that house before being sent to prison on
another charge, and now she and her husband start a campaign to force Leila to
move out of it, culminating in putting an ad in every London newspaper offering
to buy snakes if people will bring them to the house. As it happens the only
person who answers the ad turns out to be Leila's estranged husband, a
vaudeville snake-charmer, and the two reunite happily while Freddie and Sally
find the necklace and return it to its owner. I liked it.
The
Road to Daybreak -- Henri J.M. Nouwen
This
is the journal Nouwen kept during most of 1985, a year he spent making up his
mind whether to accept the offer to become the pastor of Daybreak, a residence
for mentally disabled people in Toronto. He admitted frankly that it was not at
all what he had thought of doing with his life; working with the poor in Latin
America was what really appealed to him. He spent a lot of time praying for the
strength to do what he was called to do, rather than follow his own
inclination; he opens the journal by dwelling on Luke 1:38, where Mary
epitomizes obedient faith: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me
according to thy word." He writes too about how although he set aside an
hour of every day for prayer, he generally didn't feel truly prayerful; his
mind wandered and he also spent a lot of time feeling tired and resentful. He
goes into some digressions on the bad effects of self-righteousness: he tells a
story about visiting a cathedral, and being taken for a tour by a friendly and
knowledgeable sexton, but when another tourist walked into the cathedral, the
sexton angrily berated him for wearing a hat in a church; Nouwen wondered if
the tourist would ever enter a church again. He was also distressed by the
question of what kind of relationship he should have with people who did not
consider Christ the center of their lives, which described most of the younger
generation of his own family. In the end he decided to go to Daybreak, where he
spent the rest of his life, concluding that sometimes Jesus calls you where you
don't want to go. A thoughtful book.
Cotton
Comes to Harlem -- Chester Himes
A
good thriller set in Harlem in the early sixties. The book opens at a big rally
for a back-to-Africa movement, with Harlem families lining up to buy tickets on
a planned liner to Africa, plus a house and land when they get there.
Back-to-Africa was a real movement but this rally is run by a swindler, who's
arranged for some fake detectives to "arrest" him at the end of the
rally and run off with the money, about $87,000, leaving the police to take the
blame. But the scheme goes off the rails when some white thieves crash the
rally in a van and steal the money, leaving several people shot and run over
behind them. The skull-cracking detectives Grave Digger and Coffin Ed find the
van, which crashed into a phone pole during its escape, and also learn that a
homeless junk man called Uncle Bud found the book's McGuffin, a bale of cotton
that bounced out of the van. (The thieves were using the thick bale as a shield
against gunfire, which would work against small-caliber pistols.) The book
turns into a running fight among all the parties looking for the cotton bale,
which probably has the loot from the robbery hidden inside it. Digger and Ed
are angry that no one cares about the Harlemites who lost all their life
savings; the two of them go off the books and break a witness out of jail to help
them, and they set all parties against each other and finally corner the rich
Southerner behind the robbery. They demand the money, but he doesn't have it --
when the bale was finally found, it was empty. So the detectives tell him
they've got him cold on a murder rap, but they'll give him two days' head start
if he coughs up the $87,000 out of his own pocket, and he agrees, knowing
Alabama won't extradite him to New York for killing a black man. The detectives
return the money to the scam victims and use their arrest of the badly-wanted
swindler to get themselves out of trouble. They later hear that the junk man
Uncle Bud is now living rich in Dakar, and they realize he must have taken the
money from the cotton bale -- so at least one Harlemite did get to go back to
Africa. I thought it was really good.
The
Continental Op -- Dashiell Hammett
A
collection of Hammett's pulp stories from Black Mask magazine in the
twenties, all narrated by a private eye whose name we're never told, an
operative for the Continental Agency (Hammett's stand-in for the Pinkertons,
where he worked himself before World War I.) In these stories the Op pursues
the Continental's business with unemotional efficiency, though he does try to
make sure that the Continental's ends line up with his own ideas of justice,
even if that means stretching the limits of a job a bit. His cold
single-mindedness lets him close several cases; I liked the one where he brings
in a near-irresistible femme fatale because he's the one man who cares
more about doing his job than getting something for himself. The stories are
well-written, full of action, and they draw a good picture of a smart and
determined man facing problems that call out his best qualities. I liked them a
lot.
Medium
Hero -- Korby Lenker
A
collection of contemporary short stories. About half of them (the better half)
are autobiographical sketches about the author's life as a struggling musician.
My favorite was a vignette about putting up flyers for a show and the
late-night conversation he had with a homeless guy who decided to help him
poster an intersection; although I also liked the one where he talked to a
stranger at a bar and admitted his secret jealousy of his more-successful
musician girlfriend. The rest includes several stories about a self-absorbed
hipster douchebag named Simon; if they're based on a real guy to make him look
like an asshole they succeed brilliantly, but I didn't like them.
*The
Cows Are Out! -- Trudy Chambers Price
Dad
bought this in Maine in 2004 (I know because he wrote the date on a bookmark.)
It's a memoir of running a dairy farm in Maine in the sixties, seventies, and
eighties. Most of it is pretty light-hearted, telling stories about the time
the cows opened the main gate, or the time the writer (who was afraid of
heights) climbed all the way up to the top of their silo to set up a Christmas
tree. There's funny stories about their kids and dogs and horses; I would have
liked more about the cows, though. It's pretty good, but the ending is a bit of
a downer: after twenty-three years of endless back-breaking labor, the author
finally concluded that the farm would never get out of debt and she was just
killing herself for the benefit of the bank, and she quit farming and went to
work in a book store. It was a good thing for uncle George that he got a salary
from taking care of the cows at the state sanitarium and so his farm didn't
fall into inescapable debt.
*The
Souls of Black Folk -- W.E.B. DuBois
DuBois's
best-known book, a collection of powerful essays on race in America. He spends
a lot of it vigorously disagreeing with the keep-our-heads-down approach of
Booker T. Washington, whose plan was for blacks to concentrate on learning
trades and forgo higher education and civil rights until some indeterminate
future time; while acknowledging Washington's important work, DuBois came out
strongly in favor of as much education as everyone could get, combined with a
strong civil-rights platform. Of course DuBois would go on to help found the
NAACP. It's been over a hundred years since the book was written and American
race relations are just about as bad as ever, which I think shows that DuBois
was right. The prose is excellent, too.
Bill
the Conqueror -- P.G. Wodehouse
A
who's-going-to-marry-whom story, with several iterations of Person A being
ordered by their family to marry Person B, although they're secretly in love
with Person C, and in any case Person B is secretly in love with Person D. The
As, Bs, Cs, and Ds all cross paths in a comic mishmash that Wodehouse expertly
untangles to have everyone end up in the right place. It was pretty funny.
*The
Middle-Aged Man on the Flying Trapeze -- James Thurber
A
collection of Thurber's very funny short pieces from the New Yorker in
the thirties, enlivened by his loose, flowing cartoons. They're mostly comic
anecdotes about Thurber (in his helplessly put-upon everyman persona) trying to
cope with the bizarre behavior of the eccentrics who always seemed to haunt his
footsteps. I liked it a lot.
Nathaniel's
Nutmeg -- Giles Milton
I
often say of a book that the idea was better than the execution; this might be
the first time I've thought it was the other way about. It's a good execution
of a poorly-thought-out idea. The author wanted to tell the story of the
seventeenth-century Englishman Nathaniel Courthope and the time he held the
tiny island of Run against a greatly superior Dutch force for almost three
years, but there's not enough material there to fill a book, so the author
pretended the fight was more consequential than it really was. In order to give
a sense of what the fighting was about he decided he needed to explain the
whole history of the spice trade, including the founding and early exploits of
the Dutch and English East India companies, and Courthope's story doesn't get
started until page 273 and it barely takes up twenty pages. Although the stand
of the English on Run genuinely was an example of courage and resource in the
face of adversity, on the scale of empires it was a minor incident that
ultimately affected nothing, and in no way merits the book's subtitle "how
one man's courage changed the course of history." Milton tries to milk
significance out of the formality that England renounced its claim to Run in
the same treaty where the Netherlands abandoned their claim to Manhattan, but
those were merely de jure recognitions of a state of affairs that had
already existed de facto for fifty years. So overall the book tries to
make a mountain out of a molehill and fails, but along the way there's a lot of
good stuff about nutmeg (its great trade value was not as a seasoning but
because quacks claimed it could prevent the plague) and about the horrible
treatment of the natives of the Spice Islands. Milton (an Englishman)
unashamedly paints the Dutch as demoniacal savages and the English as
open-handed saints, portrayals that can be dismissed without further comment.
More accurately, you could say the main difference was in the commanders the
Dutch and English companies chose for their fleets; the Dutch sent brutal
idiots while the English sent incompetent idiots. It was well-written but it
has an ill-chosen structure and doesn't achieve its end.
Letters
To His Neighbor -- Marcel Proust (Lydia Davis, trans.)
I
found this in the City Lights book store in San Francisco; it's the book I
would have given Dad for Christmas. After Proust's mother died, he moved into
an apartment in a building his family owned in Paris. He was chronically ill,
with bad asthma and probably other undiagnosed problems, on top of being a
nervous, high-strung person who had trouble sleeping. Unfortunately for him,
after he'd lived there a year or two, the next two floors up were taken by an
American who ran a thriving dentistry practice directly over his head. This
caused Proust endless annoyance -- the loud machinery, the tramp of feet, the
constant stream of patients who rang Proust's doorbell looking for the
dentist's office. To make things worse the dentist had a mania for renovation
and there were always carpenters, painters, plumbers, electricians, pounding
away while poor Proust was sitting below trying to write The Guermantes Way.
This book contains a series of letters, only recently discovered, that Proust
wrote to his upstairs neighbors between 1908 and 1918, complaining about the
noise in the most polite and agreeable way possible. Only Proust would
apologize for asking his neighbors to keep the noise down by sending them
flowers and presents of game birds. Most of the letters are addressed to the
dentist's wife, a cultured and intelligent person who read Proust's novels and
occasionally sent him books to read. They seem never to have met, which for
anyone else would be surprising, but Proust was something of a recluse and the
dentist's wife appears to have been a shut-in -- her letters to Proust have not
survived so I don't know what her problem was. Serendipitously, right before I
found this book I had just gotten to the part in Within a Budding Grove
where Albertine points out to the narrator the resort town's various characters
of interest, one of whom she calls "the dentist"; this is certainly a
portrait of Proust's upstairs neighbor. The letters are good reading,
interestingly written in the same style as his fiction: long sentences
containing many nested clauses with no punctuation whatever, but perfectly
clear -- you never have to go back and reread a sentence in order to understand
it. That's impressive because the book has photos of several of the letters,
and they're obviously written off the top of his head, not the product of
several careful drafts: the handwriting is loose and fast, with extra clauses
stuck in the margins. I liked it.
Believe
Me -- Eddie Izzard
Izzard's
autobiography. On a bookseller's recommendation I listened to the audiobook,
which Izzard himself narrates; because he can never resist ad-libbing the
audiobook is probably half again as long as the printed one. It was funny and
interesting, going over Izzard's childhood, his years at boarding school (with
great passages about the appalling school food), and his coming out in his
twenties. He says "alternative sexuality" instead of
"LGBTQ" -- I always thought that was just a British thing, but it turns
out he's dyslexic and it's very difficult for him to recite a string of
letters. He spends a lot of time on his early career as a street performer --
having a volunteer truss him up with chains and padlocks and then getting out
of them while riding a unicycle, that sort of thing -- and how the patter he
used developed into his voice as a performer. He talks a lot about what he
calls the Great Wall of No -- everything he's ever wanted to do, he did
in the face of people telling him no, no, no, no, no. Luckily his father
was always very supportive, although he seems to have had a difficult time with
his stepmother, a socially conservative woman with a do-what-you're-told
philosophy of life. There was a touching scene when he came out to his father
and his father said he was okay with it, and then said "You know your
mother would have been okay with it too" and he was just flattened. Like
most people Izzard seems to believe that the path he followed to success is the
only good one, which leads him to some silly doctrinaire conclusions, such as
that learning to read sheet music prevents you from being creative musically.
Overall, though, it's a very good book, and the bookseller was right: if you
want to read this, listen to the audiobook.
At
The Mountains of Madness -- H.P. Lovecraft
A
collection of three of his famous horror stories: the title novella plus the
shorter "The Whisperer in Darkness" and "The Shadow Out of
Time". The stories have dated quite a bit, I think, mostly because
Lovecraft was born in 1890 and educated with the nineteenth-century
great-chain-of-being idea of a hierarchy of life with humanity at the top. The
horror of his stories lies in the narrators slowly discovering the existence of
unthinkably older races than humanity, incomprehensible beings that came from
other planets or other planes of reality and lived on Earth a billion years
ago; what makes them terrible is their total indifference -- humanity means
nothing at all to them. The realization causes the narrators indescribable fear
and pushes them near insanity, due to the sense of loss of their central
identity. I remember that in The War of the Worlds the narrator says
that the worst thing about the arrival of the Martians was the sense of being
dethroned as the rulers of the world. As a product of a post-world-war,
post-space-age education myself, ideas that fill Lovecraft's narrators with
terror are just things I take for granted: I have understood since I was small
that the Earth is unfathomably old, and I have never thought of humanity as
anything other than a very successful animal among other animals. That's why I
found "The Whisperer in Darkness" the most effective of the stories:
the narrator is in actual physical danger, not just threatened existentially.
The writing is a little stiff but it's still a good read.
"The Crimson Patch"
ReplyDeleteI love this comment, it's a beautiful snap-shot of Mike's parents relationship.
"Dad liked the scene where a character tries to get to sleep and instead of counting sheep recites the Iliad and "Thanatopsis" to himself. (Dad notes that Mom memorized part of "Thanatopsis" in school, but when I asked her about it she said she didn't and had probably just said that to show off.)