tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3119816335163312523.post7238030042471098582..comments2023-04-27T04:39:45.647-04:00Comments on JT Thinks About Stuff: Back AgainJThttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12170062950345779215noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3119816335163312523.post-44170569992053092542017-03-17T11:23:06.618-04:002017-03-17T11:23:06.618-04:00A weighty question. "Several" is definit...A weighty question. "Several" is definitely more than two. Upon mature consideration I would enumerate "several" as three to six. Admittedly this overlaps with "[a] few"; but "few" carries a definite connotation of smallness, scarcity, of insufficiency that "several" lacks.<br /><br />This has been your periodic definitional quiddity update.JThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12170062950345779215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3119816335163312523.post-86826355444510895282017-03-17T04:32:49.902-04:002017-03-17T04:32:49.902-04:00If a couple is two, and a few is three, then sever...If a couple is two, and a few is three, then several is less than a dozen yet more than fou?seanovanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00288825590780391411noreply@blogger.com